Could someone tell me what is really the difference between these
two games? Which one should I have, and why?
Jeff Heidman
Jeffrey A Heidman <jhei...@CS.Arizona.EDU> wrote in article
<Pine.SOL.3.91.970417...@lectura.CS.Arizona.EDU>...
>
> Could someone tell me what is really the difference between these
> two games? Which one should I have, and why?
>
> Jeff Heidman
>
i believe harpoon 97, <cd> has all the foregoing editions incorporated, i
own '97, & original harpoon on 3.5" discs.thats how it appears to me. '97
also includes designers edition scenarios for all 4 battlesets, this adds
upto hundreds<probably>of scenarios you otherwise wouldn't have!
Have gun will travel
Wire Pali...@getnet.com
Big differences. I have them both and the two major differences are :
1. HC runs quick, H2 runs slow. If you haven't got a Pentium I wouldn't
bother with H2. I spent 2 years plodding along with a 486 DX4100 and I've
never looked back since getting my P166.
2. HC is much more readily available.
Having put together what looks like a major plug for HC, I actually play
H2 a lot more!
jr
>
>
>Jeffrey A Heidman <jhei...@CS.Arizona.EDU> wrote in article
><Pine.SOL.3.91.970417...@lectura.CS.Arizona.EDU>...
>>
>> Could someone tell me what is really the difference between these
>> two games? Which one should I have, and why?
>>
>> Jeff Heidman
>>
>i believe harpoon 97, <cd> has all the foregoing editions incorporated, i
>own '97, & original harpoon on 3.5" discs.thats how it appears to me. '97
>also includes designers edition scenarios for all 4 battlesets, this adds
>upto hundreds<probably>of scenarios you otherwise wouldn't have!
>
There is a big difference between Harp 97 & II, Harpoon2 has a
completely different interface, and game engine than 97. It has a very
complicated dos extender that makes the game very difficult to
configure properly, (though once configured correctly runs
exceptionally well).
Harpoon 2 is far more sophisticated and realistic than the previous
versions. The new admiral edition includes all battlesets, database,
and scenario editor. My choice has always been harpoon 2, but 97 is
fun to play.
Interested Site for Harpooner: http://www.dakotacom.net/~sjacobs/, which is
the best site of harpoon now
Sonny
Lord Mark <Pali...@getnet.com> wrote in article
<3356B4...@getnet.com>...
> Could someone tell me what is really the difference between these
>two games? Which one should I have, and why?
>
Over the last couple of years I have been tempted to buy Harpoon II
from the shops. But, having seen messages on USENET - Harpoon 2
appears to contain loads of bugs.
Is this correct ?
Didn't I see your wife in a GIF ?
The last release Harpoon II Admirals Edition is less buggy than any of
previous releases.
I think the nicest thing is the ability to craft new platforms
yourself. something not possible with Harpoon Classic/97
>Didn't I see your wife in a GIF ?
--
ssg paul d. carrier pa...@teleport.com
armament maintnance supervisor
Det. 2 HHC 145th Maint. BN. "There is no place in war for oregon national guard delicate machinery"
A.P.Wavell
Just read a post about a PacWar ftp site and got a beta copy of PWReports
and some scenario variants downloaded -- but there are mentions of a
PW*Edit* program that seems to be no longer available, and of other
scenarios such as a Nimitz enabled "Final Countdown" one ... none of which
have still existing links from said ftp site. Does anyone have further
information as to where these might be tracked down to *still* viable URLs?
I would greatly appreciate any help -- if only I'd had 'Net access when
PacWar first came out!
Also, on a related matter, are there any similar games in the pipeline
(hopefully something better that the awful Koei PTO2)?
Thanks,
Phil
--
Phillip McGregor | asp...@curie.dialix.oz.au
Have Game Designer, Will Travel
Co-Designer, Space Opera; Designer, Rigger Black Book
>Jeffrey A Heidman <jhei...@CS.Arizona.EDU> wrote:
>> Could someone tell me what is really the difference between these
>>two games? Which one should I have, and why?
>Big differences. I have them both and the two major differences are :
>1. HC runs quick, H2 runs slow. If you haven't got a Pentium I wouldn't
>bother with H2. I spent 2 years plodding along with a 486 DX4100 and I've
>never looked back since getting my P166.
>2. HC is much more readily available.
>Having put together what looks like a major plug for HC, I actually play
>H2 a lot more!
>jr
Who cares?<G> "load 'em up, CAG, I want the Kirov sunk by sundown!"
Could you tell I'm a dedicated Harpooner?<G>
fitt...@mindspring.com
Byron Audler
aka, @jclark, #military2, undernet IRC