Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

EA, Jane's & Unfair Play = Electronic Arts ARE CHEATS

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mimes

unread,
Apr 6, 2001, 9:53:20 PM4/6/01
to
Hi there,

Just a word of warning, it seems that when you buy EA/Jane's title,
such as USAF or Fighters Anthology (I know, these are older titles),
you get no manual. These titles now parade under the same name as
tehir predecessors, but have no manual in the box and the bottom of
the box has a yellow stripe with a word "CLASSIC" in it.

You can send a request for manual, but don't hold your breath. Not
only will you get no manual, not even a reason why not...

I feel thoroughly cheated by this company (EA). I promise NEVER to
EVER buy any product from EA.

Take care out there,

Some companies do not care.

Mimes

Canuck

unread,
Apr 6, 2001, 10:20:52 PM4/6/01
to
Check your disk. I'm sure that it has the manual in .pdf format viewable
with Adobe Acrobat Reader ( a free download if not also included ) I bought
Janes WW2 Ftrs and it was there. If it is, how about an apology?

Canuck,

"Mimes" <mi...@picknowl.com.au> wrote in message
news:3ace7198...@news.dingoblue.net.au...

+ G

unread,
Apr 6, 2001, 10:57:05 PM4/6/01
to
He's right about not getting a manual after you mail in the card. I begged
for 6 months, they had cashed my check. The manuals I eventually got were
used. You'd be better off getting the PDF on the CD printed at Kinko's.


Jagg

unread,
Apr 7, 2001, 2:54:54 PM4/7/01
to
On Sat, 07 Apr 2001 01:53:20 GMT, mi...@picknowl.com.au (Mimes) wrote:

>Hi there,
>
>Just a word of warning, it seems that when you buy EA/Jane's title,
>such as USAF or Fighters Anthology (I know, these are older titles),
>you get no manual. These titles now parade under the same name as
>tehir predecessors, but have no manual in the box and the bottom of
>the box has a yellow stripe with a word "CLASSIC" in it.

That's why the Classic editions are cheap compared to the original
versions. You can tell there is no manual by the weight of the box.
The manual is on the cdrom in .pdf format. That's the way all EA
Classic editions are.

Liang Yin

unread,
Apr 7, 2001, 5:54:16 PM4/7/01
to

Also, the words "Documentation is provided on disc" are printed at
the bottom of the box in the system requirements area. This seems
to suggest that there is no printed manual inside.

These classics versions are not a bad deal, I got FA18, USAF, and
NFS:High Stakes for $30 total.

Mimes

unread,
Apr 8, 2001, 5:44:18 AM4/8/01
to
No, I had no idea if manual was there, cos Chips'nBits on line sold it
as a proper version, not the doggy brothers one.

Also have you tried to fly on 1 PC and having a *.pdf manual on
another PC, maybe second monitor sitting on your lap...anyhow, USAF
was a waste of money, not worth printing any manual for it. Time to
fly Flanker 2 again!

Mimes

On Sat, 07 Apr 2001 21:54:16 GMT, Liang Yin <l....@worldnet.att.net>

Mimes

unread,
Apr 8, 2001, 5:45:50 AM4/8/01
to
And it was not cheap. Cost me $60 with all the packaging and postage
shit, to be sent to OZ.

Mimes

Message has been deleted

denn...@home.com

unread,
Apr 12, 2001, 3:17:14 AM4/12/01
to
You should be pissed at Chips and Bits (or Chumps and Bitches, as I
prefer to call them), a EA "classic" should be about $10. Maybe the
high cost was due to the shipping charges for the barrel of vaseline!

On Sat, 07 Apr 2001 01:53:20 GMT, mi...@picknowl.com.au (Mimes) wrote:

Nos v7.0000001

unread,
Apr 12, 2001, 1:17:05 PM4/12/01
to
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 07:17:14 GMT, denn...@home.com wrote:

>You should be pissed at Chips and Bits (or Chumps and Bitches, as I
>prefer to call them), a EA "classic" should be about $10. Maybe the
>high cost was due to the shipping charges for the barrel of vaseline!
>

I just checked C&B and the price is $18.95, so that means he paid
$40.00 for shipping/taxes etc. Seems rather high for shipping, even to
AUS. One thing though is that they show a picture of the original F18
box and not an EA Classic. Could be a case of false representation of
a product and he should be able to get his money back if he complains
loud enough.

John Slade

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 6:05:55 PM4/30/01
to

"Nos v7.0000001" <n...@email.here> wrote in message
news:umobdt81qnhooq8ar...@4ax.com...

You know this is/was a new trick by EA with regards to Jane's. They knew
Jane's was going out of business so they pull this trick. When EA used to
market it's "classic" games, they had "classic" on the box or the box had no
fold out cover. When USAF and F18 went to classic they kept the fold out
cover so you wouldn't know at first glance that it was a classic package.
You had to read the fine print on the bottom of the box. I found this out by
buying Janes F18 and USAF together when they just went "classic". I got the
F18 package for $15 and it had the full printed manual. The USAF box didn't
have the manual. It was also $15. I was pretty pissed but I realized that on
the nomenclature on the bottom of the box, in very very tiny print at the
bottom, it said "Documentation is on disc. Printer required to print on-disk
manual." I can only guess that EA has gotten a lot of flak over this slimey
behavior thus they put the games in a box clearly marked "classic" later on.
In retrospect, the games are worth the money. I just wish EA had not stooped
so low. I would hope that since EA's license period of the Jane's label is
over, Jane's could start producing it's own simulations or lisence it's name
to someone else.

John

Gavin Bennett

unread,
Apr 30, 2001, 6:18:11 PM4/30/01
to
I have heard rumours that maybe Microsoft might have licensed the name, but
this is only a rumour.

But "Janes" is a well known brand name - as a maker of military nerd books,
and geopolitical examinations of situations. EA had a bunch of different
simulation products going on from a bunch of different companies, so they
licensed the name to offer a "unifed" brand name. They probably paid Janes
well to use their aircraft data and scenario data.

Janes probably won't repeat this. I doubt it was much use to them, other
than get a few simmers interested in buying their books (check out the At
the Controls Series, by the way - those are COOL).

It's kinda sad. I liked the brand name. I liked the little articles in the
manuals.

Gavin


0 new messages