On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:06:32 +0100, kyonshi <
gmk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Nostalgia is a big force in our lives. Although some DOS games are
>genuinely good.
Some are. Most are not. And even the best, I'd be hard pressed to
recommend to gamers who haven't lived through that era. I mean, I
/love/ games like "Full Throttle" but is it really worth it to a
non-fan to play it over other modern games? I'm not sure it is. It's
not like older movies or books from a previous era, where the message
being told is so universal or important that it transcends the medium.
A great game from the 90s isn't really saying or doing anything a
great game from 2010 isn't doing too. Sure, if you're a fan of a
certain genre and have played all the rest (or have a historical
interest in the hobby), the older games are important. But if you're
just a gamer who wants a fun time, is it really worth the hassle of
playing a 30-year old game with subpar visuals and controls? As much
as I love the classics, I'd be hard pressed to argue yes.
Not that I'm giving up my collection of hundres of DOS games anytime
soon. I love those clunky old titles. But I totally understand why
most people look askance at my hobby (and politely excuse themselves
when I boot one up to 'show them how cool it is'. ;-)
>It might be the easiest to install a virtual machine for it I guess.
>Although that always is a bit of a hassle.
I've found virtual machines to be /very/ hit or miss for games of that
era. Whether it's hardware & software incompatibilties or just
performance, there's a whole bunch of games from roughly 97 to 2010
that just aren't easily playable anymore except on native hardware.
Fortunately, I have native hardware (although even that isn't a
panacea, since - if the game was only available on Steam or a similar
service - you still may not get it running because the older OS is no
longer supported).