PW <emailad...@ifIremember.com> looked up from reading the entrails
of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:
No, No, No!
They're being "Green" in that they never made a manual of any kind in
the first place, thus they never had an employee or employees working on
one and thus many hours of computing and such were saved.
Also no artwork created digitally or on paper for later scanning.
Less wear on the systems and less energy and man hours used = "Green".
Never assume that what you mean by a term is the same as what they mean.
It's also "green" as in they didn't have to pay for any of that, thus
more greenbacks in their pockets (note: assumes US currency.)
The fact that their "green" lack of manual also results in users
spending hours searching the net, printing out documents etc is
irrelevant to their definition - after all, they're not responsible for
what you do, even if they are the root cause, and they can always point
at someone who didn't do any of those things as an example of why they
aren't the root cause.
Game company saves 50 man hours of creation time in making a really good
manual and 10,000 users each spend an hour or so searching for the
information they need that would have been in that manual.
Game company claims it's "green" for saving those 50 hours, despite the
end result being 9950 extra man hours used in reality and concomitant
increased resource usage.
It's like those carbon credits - a company that reduces their emissions
gets the credits, which they sell to a company that hasn't and may be
increasing theirs - end result, no real decrease in pollution, but lots
of claims that there is.
Xocyll
--
I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr