CWBLOGON <AS name or IP address> /U <user name) /P <password>
In the emulation configuration (you can reach it via Operation Navigator)
you have to set to connect to AS with a specific user, the same you specify
in the .BAT file.
I hope to be helpful. Sorry for my english.
Fabio
From Italy
"Bigeasy" <Conrad...@nospam.gzm.geveke.nl> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:9k604u$5h7$1...@azure.nl.gxn.net...
In the connection properties you can specify "Use Windows logon". I haven't
tried it but the help text says it works. Of course the Windows
logon/password would have to match the AS400 logon/password.
best wishes,
Doug
"Bigeasy" <Conrad...@nospam.gzm.geveke.nl> wrote in message
news:9k604u$5h7$1...@azure.nl.gxn.net...
Barry
"Bigeasy" <Conrad...@nospam.gzm.geveke.nl> wrote in message
news:9k604u$5h7$1...@azure.nl.gxn.net...
This is absolutely CRAZY !!
IBM has obviously decided that password security on PC's which access
AS/400s is a thing of the past.
Since when would any sane IS Manager allow insecure AS/400 passwords?
[...snipped...]
> I hope to be helpful. Sorry for my english.
No problem with your English Fabio :-)
The other big "improvement" in CA Express is the total botch job on
Network Drive/Printer support.
Even working on a LAN it's next to impossible to set up ..... even IBM
Support only managed to get me as far as having to search for my AS/400
by IP address (in Win2K) and then latch on to it. Trying to get
Network Drives to an AS/400 over an internet connection is well nigh
impossible.
Perhaps in Version 5 CA Express will give me a working solution to both
these problems?
"Fabio" <fabio.da...@dallagnese.it> wrote in message
news:9k63l9$2hg8r$1...@ID-100148.news.dfncis.de...
> So does anyone know this little diddy on the password thing..
>
> Ideally, we'd use the Windows password/login for the AS/400. But
> guess what...I think the AS/400 is limited to the number of characters
> in the login / password
>
> So...if we for example had a user..I'll make up a name:
>
> rvandenhout
>
> we'd have to use something shorter. And then the lovely thing about
> that is that the e-mail address would then be shorter if we used
> things the same across the board.
>
> When will the 400 play nice with other things? Sometimes it acts
> like it wants to be a legacy box. Yes, MS stuff isn't so great, but
> the 400 should make it easier to manage passwords and not be length
> limited.
Actually, V5R1 of OS400 supports passwords up to 128 characters. Passwords can
consist of any keyboard characters, including blanks, and are case sensitive.
The only restriction is that it can't be all blanks.
Actually, the ability to cache passwords was a Microsoft feature in
Win9x/ME
that does not exist in Windows NT or 2000. The ability to cache or not
cache
passwords has nothing to do with your Client Access release.
The Microsoft password cache (PWL files) is, in itself, insanely easy to
break and is barely more secure than using the passwords in the open
using CWBLOGON.
The best compromise in many cases is to have the user's Windows and
AS/400 IDs and passwords match, then choose to have Client Access use
the Windows logon for signon. Windows 2000 passwords are significantly
safer than the old PWL files from Win9x, and the password cracking tools
I've seen for WIndows NT/2000 all either did not word or required the user
to already be logged into the PC with administrator rights.
.
To set the connection options, right click on the AS/400 system name in
Operations Navigator and choose "Properties" from te context menu. The
setting in question is on the connection tab.