PLEASE POST:Cubase or Notator cracked
Needy
I have legal Cubase 3.0 and Notator 3.15. However key contacts got wear out.
Please help with cracked version. Post it in any groups above.
Cracked Cubase 2.0 also OK.
George
I use Cubase Score and once I had problems with my key, propably
static electricity. I contacted my Steinberg dealer, send him the key
and i had a new one in two days. Why don't you do the same?
George
P.S. As far as i Know this group and all Atari groups are legal.
John S. Gray
If one has legally purchased the software there shouldn't be a problem
with hacking with the software so that it bypasses the dongle on bootup.
Tahat;s what makes Notator incompatible with 030 processors
John Perez
: If one has legally purchased the software there shouldn't be a problem
: with hacking with the software so that it bypasses the dongle on bootup.
: Tahat;s what makes Notator incompatible with 030 processors
Actually, I don't know that this is the case. I mentioned this concern to
one of the developers of Notator, and was told that there were various
"internal" reasons for the incompatibility with 030 processors. I
personally would love to be able to use Notator again, as my ST is in
limbo, and Logic is a bit too clunky and slow for my tastes.
I wish that some Falcon compatible version of Notator existed, Dongle or
not. I own Logic and Notator, it's only fair that I should be able to use
them.
JP
Brian Roland
John Perez (jpe...@Hawaii.Edu) wrote:
:
: I wish that some Falcon compatible version of Notator existed, Dongle or
: not. I own Logic and Notator, it's only fair that I should be able to use
: them.
:
: JP
I recall reading a press release somewhere that stated a Falcon compatible
verison of Notator/Creator does exist. I have no idea if it actually came
into reality...but it was at least promised at one time.
Has anyone tried this?
Loading an older ST TOS image onto the Falcon and then attempting to run
Notator at an 8mhz clock speed? My understanding is that the problem
isn't in the processor, but in how Logic hooks directly into the GEM
desk-top. In theory...the 030 should be able to handle any 000, or 020
processes (the backwards compatibility thing). Also my understanding is
that the few programs that do choke under an 030 (such as spectre GCR) are
due to clock speed, and other hardware problems more than the processor.
I dunno...just yapping possibilities really.
Brian
John Perez
Brian Roland (b...@Edison.EbiCom.Net) wrote:
: : I wish that some Falcon compatible version of Notator existed, Dongle or
: : not. I own Logic and Notator, it's only fair that I should be able to use
: : them.
: Has anyone tried this?
: Loading an older ST TOS image onto the Falcon and then attempting to run
: Notator at an 8mhz clock speed? My understanding is that the problem
: isn't in the processor, but in how Logic hooks directly into the GEM
: desk-top. In theory...the 030 should be able to handle any 000, or 020
: processes (the backwards compatibility thing). Also my understanding is
: that the few programs that do choke under an 030 (such as spectre GCR) are
: due to clock speed, and other hardware problems more than the processor.
I believe that I have tried a number of variations (shutting down cache,
reducing clock speed, running backwards and other TOS emulators, etc...)
I'm pretty sure the Falcon will choke with an earlier TOS image. I just
wish that Emagic would have updated Notator rather than assuming that we
all want to use Logic. The version of Logic that I have has a number of
irritating flaws that make it difficult to sequence with. I hope that
those have been rectified in 2.5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aloha,
John Perez - jpe...@hawaii.edu
Computer Specialist - Office of Information Systems
University of Hawaii - School of Nursing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Needy
>>I have legal Cubase 3.0 and Notator 3.15. However key contacts got wear out.
>>Please help with cracked version. Post it in any groups above.
>>Cracked Cubase 2.0 also OK.>
Thanks to all participants for debates about cracked Cubase/Notator.
I could not find this days free of key Notator, but I got AtariCubase v.3,
working fine w/o inserting dongle in cartridge port and I am really happy.
I think it is right time for C-Lab/Emagic to make last version of NotatorSL
free of key. Yes, authors themself should crack their program. It will work
faster, with less chance of freezing and processing speed may be almost
doubled using 16Mhz accelerator like on my STE1040 4Mb w/mechanical
switch 8/16 Mhz.
Notator cannot bring them profit anymore until it stuck to current dongle,
but Emagic is loosing their honour, when users paid for their product a lot
and have nothing now.
So, upload of cracked Cubase to alt. groups with a word "warez" is possible
as well as Emailing. But are Atari newsreaders or Email readers capable
to get binaries files (zipped)? I really dont know.
I never used Atari for Internet.
Please express your opinion in this thread.
Believe me folks, Notator was better than Cubase, but hardest-to-crack Notator
was not so popular as easier-to-crack Cubase. Pirated versions of Atari Cubase
became buzzing and buzzing word among non musicians but curious majority.
That was cruicial for Cubase popularity in Atari platform.
The "warez" copy of Cubase was best commercial Steinberg ever had.
Market users (musicians) was forced to buy Cubase for reason of manual to find
countless hints inside manual. In money sense Steinberg won, C-Lab lost
(inspite of better product!). Of course it is unreal to use Notator w/o
manual.
This is THE LESSON for next brilliant or genius guys who may be blind in
super heavy protection of their amaizing product.
C-Lab/Emagic launched Logic claimed "it is light speed ahead of Notator".
It was not true. Overall speed was slower. For my knowlege musicians
was not convinced to that claim. Without
this claim Emagic could do better with Logic (in money sense also).
Needy.