The PAL version has slightly different circuitry to handle PAL. In
order to accommodate the timing differences (50hz vs 60hz) there is a
timing difference onboard to accommodate that as well. In order to
have PAL color, it required an additional card -- otherwise it was a
monochrome affair.
http://www.applefritter.com/node/23779
Having said that, it was a rather interesting thing for me living in
the Netherlands for 8 months with an American NTSC model (and NTSC
monitor) running on 50hz power. We had to replace the power supply on
the //e after a month to a euro 220v supply -- and still have that in
a box somewhere, but otherwise no other issues.
-B
So this card provided color on a PAL system, was it compatible with
existing software on the Apple II that used color? Also, did it have
the same color-bleeding issues that the NTSC versions had?
> So this card provided color on a PAL system, was it compatible with
> existing software on the Apple II that used color? Also, did it have
> the same color-bleeding issues that the NTSC versions had?
The non-American Apple II was not PAL in itself. It just came with a 240
volt supply, and had the timing slightly adjusted to suit. It still
output NTSC natively, and needed some form of modulator, such as the PAL
card, to give colour output to PAL monitors. In my experience, it did
not work too well.
The non-American //c had a different power brick, and came with an
optional plug in PAL modulator.
It was only with the PAL //e, that we got a true PAL Apple II, as the
motherboard we had was entirely different, with the AUX memory slot in a
different place.
The IIgs reverted to an NTSC only computer, but as it had RGB output
that we could feed into a SCART control or a monitor, this did not
matter.
Cheers - Ewen