Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DRAM chip question - x8 vs x1

152 views
Skip to first unread message

Chris Zuhars

unread,
Sep 18, 2016, 12:24:56 PM9/18/16
to
Hi,

I'm wanting to buy new DRAM for my Ramfactor III card. The existing 2 chips it has say 41256-15 which I know are 256k 150ns chips.

However, my understanding of the board is: fully populated,it is 1mb, which means 4 banks of 8 256k DRAM chips. Correct so far?

So when I spec 32 new DRAM chips from Jameco or someplace, what comes up is often 256x1 chips for that model (41256). So those wouldn't be the same as 256x8 chips, are they?

Do I need to specifically choose 256x8 chips? Or would these 256x1s work? I think the former, but I just wanted to make sure.

Thx!
Chris

David Empson

unread,
Sep 18, 2016, 5:03:07 PM9/18/16
to
Chris Zuhars <czu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm wanting to buy new DRAM for my Ramfactor III card. The existing 2
> chips it has say 41256-15 which I know are 256k 150ns chips.
>
> However, my understanding of the board is: fully populated,it is 1mb,
> which means 4 banks of 8 256k DRAM chips. Correct so far?

Sounds right.

http://apple2.info/wiki/index.php?title=RAM_Cards

> So when I spec 32 new DRAM chips from Jameco or someplace, what comes up
> is often 256x1 chips for that model (41256). So those wouldn't be the same
> as 256x8 chips, are they?

Correct. The number after the 'x' is data bus width of the memory chip.

A 256Kx1 chip has 1 data line (and enough address pins for 256K
locations). Each address produces a single bit of data from that chip,
so you need a set of 8 matching chips to produce 8 bits of data.

A 256Kx8 chip has 8 data lines (and enough address pins for 256K
locations). A single chip produces 8 bits of data.

The wider data bus means the 256Kx8 chip has more pins and will be a
physically larger package. It won't even fit in the socket of a board
which expects to use 256Kx1 chips.

> Do I need to specifically choose 256x8 chips? Or would these 256x1s work?
> I think the former, but I just wanted to make sure.

256Kx8 chips will NOT work. Look specifically for the "41256" part
number to get 256Kx1, and you will need 32 of them to fully populate the
card.

--
David Empson
dem...@actrix.gen.nz

Chris Zuhars

unread,
Sep 20, 2016, 7:47:25 AM9/20/16
to
Thanks David. Just the explanation I needed. After posting, (as usual) I re-thought it out, and the 256x1 chips made sense. Just good to get some knowledgeable confirmation.

Chris

Whazzupdoc

unread,
Sep 21, 2016, 1:14:09 PM9/21/16
to
I have had good luck buying from Unicorn Electronics

http://www.unicornelectronics.com/IC/DYNAMIC.html

The 41256 (256x1) RAM works in both of may cards:
RAMWorks III by Applied Engineering 1024K / 3 Meg. Max
The Apple IIgs Memory Expansion by Apple Computer 1024K / 1 Meg.

Anything specified at 150ns or faster will work.
I have been ordering the 120ns:
Stock# 41256-120
Pins: 16
Description: 262,144 x 1

Michael J. Mahon

unread,
Sep 21, 2016, 2:08:42 PM9/21/16
to
These chips were extremely plentiful in older PCs--around the early- to
mid-90s. Check thrift and surplus stores. They were usually socketed.
--
-michael - NadaNet 3.1 and AppleCrate II: http://michaeljmahon.com

Michael Black

unread,
Sep 21, 2016, 7:29:32 PM9/21/16
to
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Michael J. Mahon wrote:

> Whazzupdoc <daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have had good luck buying from Unicorn Electronics
>>
>> http://www.unicornelectronics.com/IC/DYNAMIC.html
>>
>> The 41256 (256x1) RAM works in both of may cards:
>> RAMWorks III by Applied Engineering 1024K / 3 Meg. Max
>> The Apple IIgs Memory Expansion by Apple Computer 1024K / 1 Meg.
>>
>> Anything specified at 150ns or faster will work.
>> I have been ordering the 120ns:
>> Stock# 41256-120
>> Pins: 16
>> Description: 262,144 x 1
>>
>
> These chips were extremely plentiful in older PCs--around the early- to
> mid-90s. Check thrift and surplus stores. They were usually socketed.

Or someone's junk box.

I remember stripping that era of RAM off boards, it had potential value at
the time, now it's useless except for things like this. Nothing new is
going to use it.

Michael

0 new messages