On 10/28/13 2:26 PM,
michael...@gmail.com wrote:
> I bet that's why he's never been prosecuted because what he is doing is not illegal.
Source code does not guarantee the right to "derivative" works. I say
"derivative" because Mr. Hardy adds no value to said works, just claims
credit for the work.
Each plagiarized release from Mr. Hardy may or may not violate the
copyright of each plagiarized target. One would have to make that
determination on a case-by-case basis.
To prosecute/sue an individual for stealing others work, you usually
have to show some type of damages (but not required). Damages is how
you fund lawsuits as well (copyright enforcement is usually a civil
matter). The age and relevance of the plagiarized code isn't
significant enough for the copyright holder to care enough for the
expense and time of pursuing Mr. Hardy, and IMHO, it is the real reason
he has not been sued.
Copyright holders can probably pursue a DMCA take-down of the
plagiarized works if they violate the copyright.