On 1/3/22 13:00,
sc...@alfter.diespammersdie.us wrote:
>
> It's somewhat amazing that it's taken them this long, given that SIS has
> been around for ~20 years,
It's not taken this long to get a browser for MSDOS... there have been
other text-based and graphical browsers starting in the 90's, such as
Arachne (See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arachne_(web_browser)). I
believe that can run on an IBM XT (although not well... I can't recall
if I had much success when I tried it on my XT). It's a pain to set up,
however, as you need to get obscure device drivers and network stacks
installed and configured. MicroWeb is much easier to set up networking
wise, because the network stack is built into the application. The cost,
however, is only one mTCP-based application can run at a time because
they assume exclusive access the the network hardware. In that respect,
a IIgs with Marinetti beats it hands down.
I assume you mentioned the PC Transported tongue-in-cheek. You might be
able to run MicroWeb on it, but it won't be fun. The Transporter doesn't
have a way to access a network card in the host. (I suppose if you were
clever and dedicated enough, you could reverse-engineer the shim code
that gives the PC Transporter access to the Apple II host's hardware and
add network support. Sounds like an incredibly hairy task even if you
are well-versed in both the Apple II and PC architectures).
MicroWeb (well, actually, the mTCP network stack it runs on) does
support a serial line internet protocol. And the PC Transporter can
access the Apple II's serial ports. However, the PC Transporter starts
dropping characters on the serial port above 4800 baud. At that slow a
baud rate, most of your bandwidth is going to be eaten by the network
protocol/packet handling overhead.
Even so, maybe I'll give it a shot on my PC Transporter-equipped IIgs.
It's been a while since I've played with it.