This is a formal Request For Discussion (RFD) to remove the moderated
RATIONALE: remove comp.binaries.amiga
There have been no approved messages since March 1998.
Distribution of binary programs via Usenet, and in particular the Big
8 comp.binaries.* groups is no longer particularly useful or viable.
The binaries groups were created before there was widespread access to
the Internet, so that propagation of binaries via Usenet was a viable
alternative to distribution via floppies or other removal storage
media sent by mail.
Binaries newsgroups typically have very short expiration periods, so
someone interested in acquiring programs would have to constantly
monitor a newsgroup, or hope that the programs were archived so that
they can be accessed via the internet (such as by FTP). But if the
programs can be sent via internet, there is no need for the Usenet
Google does not archive binaries in newsgroups. So even though they
maintain archives of the comp.binaries.* groups, they do not archive
most of the content (the reason for existence of the group in the
Over the years, programs have generally become larger and more
complex. When transmitted by Usenet this may require the programs be
distributed in many parts, some of which may be lost. Again,
transmission via FTP is more reliable.
The moderators of binaries newsgroups may be legally responsible for
the reliability of software, whether it is legal to distribute, and
whether it is free of viruses and trojans. Many may not be willing to
assume that responsibility, and unmoderated binaries groups are not
acceptable in the Big 8.
This proposal is one of several that will removal all groups in the
comp.binaries.* hierarchy except comp.binaries.cbm.
The newsgroup mod.amiga.binaries was created around January 1986, and
renamed to comp.binaries.amiga in April 1987 as part of the Great
The full (draft) group removal procedure is documented here:
Those who wish to comment on this request to remove this newsgroup should
subscribe to news.groups and participate in the relevant threads in that
To this end, the followup header of this RFD has been set to news.groups.
All discussion of active proposals should be posted to news.groups.
If desired by the readership of closely affected groups, the discussion
may be crossposted to those groups, but care must be taken to ensure that
all discussion appears in news.groups as well.
This document has been posted to the following newsgroups:
Jim Riley <jim...@pipeline.com>
2006-09-28 1st RFD