Groups
Conversations
All groups and messages
Send feedback to Google
Help
Sign in
Groups
comp.std.c++
Conversations
About
comp.std.c++
1–30 of 12979
Mark all as read
Report abusive group
0 selected
Ian Collins
, …
Keith Thompson
7
4/1/16
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support
Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally
unread,
Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support
Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally
4/1/16
WIJ
3/18/16
Amend request (throwing error)
The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely
unread,
Amend request (throwing error)
The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely
3/18/16
Christoph Schulz
,
Christof Meerwald
3
3/16/16
C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs
Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5
unread,
C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs
Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5
3/16/16
W Karas
3/16/16
Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes
A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>
unread,
Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes
A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>
3/16/16
Edward Rosten
3/16/16
Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.
Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further
unread,
Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.
Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further
3/16/16
Jonathan Jones
,
Bo Persson
2
9/13/15
Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies
On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following
unread,
Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies
On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following
9/13/15
Johannes Gerd Becker
, …
Richard Smith
8
8/21/15
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes
unread,
Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?
Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes
8/21/15
stg
,
Jakob Bohm
2
8/14/15
Unicode support in C++ 17
On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode
unread,
Unicode support in C++ 17
On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode
8/14/15
Joaquín M López Muñoz
,
vervae...@googlemail.com
2
7/30/15
Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments
This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op
unread,
Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments
This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op
7/30/15
Anders Granlund
7/15/15
Conflicting extern variable declarations
Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile
unread,
Conflicting extern variable declarations
Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile
7/15/15
Bo Persson
,
Martin Bonner
2
6/29/15
How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"
On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template
unread,
How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"
On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template
6/29/15
itaj sherman
,
via....@googlemail.com
3
6/26/15
Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while
unread,
Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads
On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while
6/26/15
Arno Schoedl
,
Öö Tiib
2
5/21/15
tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion
unread,
tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators
On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion
5/21/15
Edward Diener
, …
James Kuyper
13
4/4/15
Macro replacement interpretation
On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>
unread,
Macro replacement interpretation
On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>
4/4/15
via....@googlemail.com
,
Jakob Bohm
3
3/30/15
object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that
unread,
object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation
On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that
3/30/15
litb
, …
avi.k...@googlemail.com
3
2/4/15
Moving local objects into lambda closure
On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your
unread,
Moving local objects into lambda closure
On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your
2/4/15
Noah Roberts
10/22/14
constexpr parameters
Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr
unread,
constexpr parameters
Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr
10/22/14
tra...@gockelhut.com
,
Öö Tiib
2
10/15/14
Destructive erase for associative containers
On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use
unread,
Destructive erase for associative containers
On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use
10/15/14
rick.c...@googlemail.com
, …
Martin Bonner
9
9/24/14
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September
unread,
N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member
On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September
9/24/14
Szabolcs Nagy
8/27/14
alignment with ISO C11
it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,
unread,
alignment with ISO C11
it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,
8/27/14
Piotr Nycz
, …
Daniel Krügler
6
6/17/14
Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?
> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >
unread,
Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?
> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >
6/17/14
jere...@googlemail.com
6/15/14
Reinterpret casting to array types
Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[
unread,
Reinterpret casting to array types
Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[
6/15/14
john....@googlemail.com
5/30/14
can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?
The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if
unread,
can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?
The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if
5/30/14
Piet
,
Daniel Krügler
2
5/14/14
Compile-time integer sequences C++14
Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >
unread,
Compile-time integer sequences C++14
Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >
5/14/14
Roman Perepelitsa
,
Daniel Krügler
2
3/21/14
Semantics of std::function's constructors
Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be
unread,
Semantics of std::function's constructors
Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be
3/21/14
Peter
,
enoquick
2
3/14/14
Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in
Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++
unread,
Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in
Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++
3/14/14
mjb...@googlemail.com
,
Daniel Krügler
2
3/12/14
Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]
Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section
unread,
Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]
Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section
3/12/14
goodb...@googlemail.com
,
James Kuyper
2
3/11/14
Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?
The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the
unread,
Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?
The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the
3/11/14
Sebastian Karlsson
, …
James Kuyper
5
2/19/14
The behavior of streambuf::seekoff
On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >
unread,
The behavior of streambuf::seekoff
On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >
2/19/14
Krzysztof Żelechowski
,
Bart van Ingen Schenau
3
1/6/14
overload resolution failed
Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski
unread,
overload resolution failed
Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski
1/6/14
