Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

Groups keyboard shortcuts have been updated

Dismiss

See shortcuts

comp.std.c++

1–30 of 12979

0 selected

Ian Collins, … Keith Thompson7

4/1/16

Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support

Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally

unread,

Specifying standard headers that don't require run time support

Ian Collins <ian-...@this.is.invalid> writes: > Has there ever been a move to formally

4/1/16

3/18/16

Amend request (throwing error)

The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely

unread,

Amend request (throwing error)

The concept and usage of error handling mechanism(throw,catch) should have now been more widely

3/18/16

Christoph Schulz, Christof Meerwald3

3/16/16

C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs

Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5

unread,

C++11: Template argument deduction, partial ordering, and trailing parameter packs

Hello! Christoph Schulz wrote: > Hello, > > I read §14.8.2.1, §14.8.2.4, and §14.8.2.5

3/16/16

3/16/16

Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes

A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>

unread,

Proposal: a "Components" template with partial specializations implicitly defined for typical classes

A "primitive" template named "Components" with this interface: <pre>

3/16/16

3/16/16

Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.

Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further

unread,

Indexing a pointer to members of a standard layout type.

Hi, I've been trying to wrangle the standardese on a bit of code with no success. For further

3/16/16

Jonathan Jones, Bo Persson2

9/13/15

Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies

On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following

unread,

Template argument name resolution and compiler discrepancies

On 2015-09-12 19:24, Jonathan Jones wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Look at the following

9/13/15

Johannes Gerd Becker, … Richard Smith8

8/21/15

Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?

Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes

unread,

Shouldn't there be a way to exclude member functions out of name lookup explicitly?

Am Donnerstag, 20. August 2015 08:20:08 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Smith: > On 27/07/15 18:22, Johannes

8/21/15

stg, Jakob Bohm2

8/14/15

Unicode support in C++ 17

On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode

unread,

Unicode support in C++ 17

On 12/08/2015 21:00, stg wrote: > > > > I would really like to see improved unicode

8/14/15

Joaquín M López Muñoz, vervae...@googlemail.com2

7/30/15

Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments

This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op

unread,

Pointer to member contravariance and template non-type arguments

This is acutallly a really good question. Too bad it didn't get the answer it deserved. Op

7/30/15

Anders Granlund

7/15/15

Conflicting extern variable declarations

Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile

unread,

Conflicting extern variable declarations

Hi, Consider the following program: int main() { extern int x; extern double x; } Trying to compile

7/15/15

Bo Persson, Martin Bonner2

6/29/15

How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template

unread,

How is reverse_iterator::base "explicit"

On Sunday, 28 June 2015 21:20:05 UTC+1, Bo Persson wrote: > The reverse_iterator class template

6/29/15

itaj sherman, via....@googlemail.com3

6/26/15

Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while

unread,

Refreshing cpu cache before atomic relaxed loads

On Monday, June 22, 2015 at 10:30:04 PM UTC+3, itaj sherman wrote: > My question turned up while

6/26/15

Arno Schoedl, Öö Tiib2

5/21/15

tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators

On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion

unread,

tertiary results of compiler-generated comparison operators

On Tuesday, 19 May 2015 10:00:05 UTC+3, Arno Schoedl wrote: > there as been some discussion

5/21/15

Edward Diener, … James Kuyper13

4/4/15

Macro replacement interpretation

On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>

unread,

Macro replacement interpretation

On 04/03/2015 04:30 PM, Edward Diener wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:38 PM, James Kuyper wrote: >>

4/4/15

via....@googlemail.com, Jakob Bohm3

3/30/15

object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that

unread,

object and pointer-to-member closure: trivial intent, arcane implementation

On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 6:10:07 PM UTC+1, Jakob Bohm wrote: [...] > A major issue is that

3/30/15

litb, … avi.k...@googlemail.com3

2/4/15

Moving local objects into lambda closure

On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your

unread,

Moving local objects into lambda closure

On Sunday, April 26, 2009 at 1:11:33 AM UTC+3, daniel....@googlemail.com wrote: > > While your

2/4/15

10/22/14

constexpr parameters

Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr

unread,

constexpr parameters

Where there insurmountable technical reasons why C++ doesn't allow you to accept constexpr

10/22/14

tra...@gockelhut.com, Öö Tiib2

10/15/14

Destructive erase for associative containers

On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use

unread,

Destructive erase for associative containers

On Friday, 10 October 2014 23:00:03 UTC+3, tra...@gockelhut.com wrote: > There are a number of use

10/15/14

rick.c...@googlemail.com, … Martin Bonner9

9/24/14

N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September

unread,

N3242 8.5.1/15 -- braced union declarations limited only to first member

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 4:00:02 PM UTC-4, Martin Bonner wrote: > On Saturday, 20 September

9/24/14

8/27/14

alignment with ISO C11

it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,

unread,

alignment with ISO C11

it seems that C++14 only references C99 (C++14 1.2p1) (more precisely "ISO/IEC 9899:1999,

8/27/14

Piotr Nycz, … Daniel Krügler6

6/17/14

Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?

> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >

unread,

Is removing necessity of std::move for local variables used for the last time a good proposal?

> To write a proposal, please read > > https://isocpp.org/std/submit-a-proposal > >

6/17/14

jere...@googlemail.com

6/15/14

Reinterpret casting to array types

Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[

unread,

Reinterpret casting to array types

Does the standard allow/consider to be defined behavior the following? T arr[100]; using T_part = T[

6/15/14

john....@googlemail.com

5/30/14

can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?

The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if

unread,

can generate_canonical return 1.0 exactly?

The text in 26.5.7.2 [rand.util.canonical] says that 0 <= tj < 1. But it seems to me that if

5/30/14

Piet, Daniel Krügler2

5/14/14

Compile-time integer sequences C++14

Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >

unread,

Compile-time integer sequences C++14

Am 13.05.2014 21:52, schrieb Piet: > > 20.5.1 of the C++14 draft reads > > example: >

5/14/14

Roman Perepelitsa, Daniel Krügler2

3/21/14

Semantics of std::function's constructors

Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be

unread,

Semantics of std::function's constructors

Am 20.03.2014 07:13, schrieb Roman Perepelitsa: > > Both C++11 and the C++14 draft seem to be

3/21/14

Peter, enoquick2

3/14/14

Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in

Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++

unread,

Static member of class not found if class name == name of namespace it's defined in

Il 12/03/2014 15:30, Peter ha scritto: > > Some time ago I started a topic on comp.lang.c++

3/14/14

mjb...@googlemail.com, Daniel Krügler2

3/12/14

Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]

Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section

unread,

Repeated headers in Table 14 [headers]

Am 11.03.2014 16:17, schrieb mjb...@googlemail.com: > > In Table 14, in [headers] (section

3/12/14

goodb...@googlemail.com, James Kuyper2

3/11/14

Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?

The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the

unread,

Which one(s) of the following std::vector's member functions has the possibility/authority to reduce the vector's capacity?

The Subject: header of a message should contain a summary of the message, it shouldn't be the

3/11/14

Sebastian Karlsson, … James Kuyper5

2/19/14

The behavior of streambuf::seekoff

On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >

unread,

The behavior of streambuf::seekoff

On 02/18/2014 05:36 PM, Daniel Krügler wrote: > Am 14.02.2014 19:41, schrieb Nach: >> >

2/19/14

Krzysztof Żelechowski, Bart van Ingen Schenau3

1/6/14

overload resolution failed

Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski

unread,

overload resolution failed

Bart van Ingen Schenau wrote: > > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:20:32 -0600, Krzysztof Żelechowski

1/6/14

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu