Webinar: How to be more Agile with Rational ClearCase
Tgefen
and be more Agile, you will not want to miss this webinar:
How to be more Agile with ClearCase UCM
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
12:00-1:00 PM EST / 9 AM PST / 11 AM CST
Presenter: Bob Aiello, Consultant and author of Configuration
Management Best Practices: Practical Methods that Work in the Real
World (http://cmbestpractices.com)
Register here: http://gomidjets.com/counter/click.php?id=177
Specific topics covered in this event include:
* Agile
* Continuous Integration (CI)
* Configuration Management and ClearCase challenges
* CompBL: Real-time Visibility on your ClearCase UCM Projects'
Status (http://gomidjets.com/compbl)
You'll learn:
* How to collect important data from ClearCase
* How to expand ClearCase documentation and reporting capabilities
* How to easily generate real-time reports about projects status:
what was changed, where, why etc.
* How to be more Agile with ClearCase
* How to improve your Continuous Integration process
* How to automatically generate Release Notes document
The webinar is free with no charge. Registration is required and space
is limited
Register here: http://gomidjets.com/counter/click.php?id=177
System Requirements:
* PC or Mac
* Speakers or earphones
Regards,
Tamir Gefen, GoMidjets
http://www.gomidjets.com
Marc Girod
> If you are interested in learning how to get the most out of ClearCase
> and be more Agile, you will not want to miss this webinar:
Please, do not confuse ClearCase with UCM.
UCM is not ClearCase!
In fact, UCM is an anti-ClearCase, if by ClearCase, one
means what made ClearCase the first SCM tool on the
market between 1992 and 1999.
UCM has completely ignored the novelty in ClearCase,
and cast in stone old CM mistakes (such as delivering
by merging).
Marc
Tgefen
It's ClearCase UCM indeed. We'll give a webinar for non-UCM ClearCase
in future.
Thanks for the comment.
Tamir
Marc Girod
> It's ClearCase UCM indeed. We'll give a webinar for non-UCM ClearCase
> in future.
I have something against webinars, to be honest.
SCM is about *managing* information.
Its first weapon is to *represent* it, in a way which
allows for an objective *identification*.
This should happen in written form.
I mean that I cannot see any reasonable alternative,
either verbal (oral), or graphical (or very limited in
the latter case...).
However, 'written' may be either text, or software,
where software is being *run* and offers an
experience with constrains interpretation.
Note that interpretation may be constrained, but
not evacuated.
Marc
Marc Girod
> SCM is about *managing* information.
This thread could be continued.
We have here one criterion to distinguish two
opposite traditions of (S)CM:
- top-down: apply rules, give talks
- bottom-up: manage contributions, discuss.
For a long time already, I have termed the first CM,
and the second SCM.
The rationale is that the latter is both more
ambitious and more humble: it doesn't even dream
to be possible without software tools, and without
using software representations.
The first was practiced for 40 years with pencil and
papers, and meetings.
It is happy to use Excel and PowerPoint as main
'Software' tools.
Of course, i don't consider Excel and PowerPoint
as software: to me, they are only hardware in disguise.
Marc