Run collinearity diagnostics and don't forget to look for plausible
effect modifiers. In the end, you may have to make this decision on a
clinical basis, not a statistical basis. You could also use factor
analysis or other methods. No matter what you do, limitations and
compromises are coming.
Marc
Frank wants to use as many predictors as possible. Marc warns
of compromises.
Marc could be jumping the gun. Frank apparently expects a
problem, but he did not establish that that is any *real* problem.
What happens when the equation uses them all? Diagnositics?
And then? What N is available to work with, to establish what
sort of R^2?
If the W's, X's and Z's each represent a sensible "latent variable",
and those latent variables are expected to carry the prediction,
then there is also no problem -- The approach *should* be
shortened to one that creates the 3 composite variables and
then uses those three for the prediction.
--
Rich Ulrich