Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Negative Factor Loadings

12,344 views
Skip to first unread message

shim...@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 4, 2006, 10:45:56 AM8/4/06
to
Hi,

I am working on my first factor analysis and I have this question:

In my factor loading table I have two factors and some variables that
some of these variables have negative factor loadings...I don't know
how to interpret my result from these negative factor loadings ...
should I ignore those negative signs and count them as positive?

Thanks a lot.

Ray Koopman

unread,
Aug 4, 2006, 2:28:41 PM8/4/06
to

A negative loading means that eople who score high on the factor will
tend to score low on the variable, and people who score low on the
factor will tend to score high on the variable.

murphy

unread,
Aug 4, 2006, 4:45:07 PM8/4/06
to
Negative factor loadings are as important as positive factor loadings.
When you look at a factor loading, it's the absolute value that you're
interested in when deciding a cut-off. That is, an item that loads
-0.7 is as important as an item that loads +0.7. Many people will use
a cut off such as .4. With this cut-off, you ignore anything less than
the absolute value of 0.4. That is, 0.2, -0.3, 0.1, -0.2 would be
ignored.

The sign on the loading (-/+) refers to the way the item relates to the
factor. Basic text books generally cover this with clear examples.
For example, say you're doing factor analysis on personality and each
factor is a trait. On the factor 'introverted', an item like
'outgoing' would have a high negative loading such as -0.8 because this
item is in 'opposition' to the factor.

Does that clarify it a bit?

dule...@yahoo.com

unread,
Aug 11, 2014, 4:01:26 AM8/11/14
to
Thank you Murphy.

anukabra...@gmail.com

unread,
May 30, 2015, 4:17:14 PM5/30/15
to
Nice thanks very much

mcgf...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 13, 2015, 8:18:46 AM6/13/15
to
murphy.. what book? for referensi. thanks.

Rich Ulrich

unread,
Jun 13, 2015, 1:16:10 PM6/13/15
to
On Sat, 13 Jun 2015 05:18:43 -0700 (PDT), mcgf...@gmail.com wrote:

>murphy.. what book? for referensi. thanks.

I liked Roderick McDonald's book on factor analysis.
But - as Murphy suggests - any textbook on factor analysis
most likely will do.

PLEASE -- If you insist on Replying to a message that is
more than a few weeks old, it is considered good form to quote
a few lines (at least) to show what you are responding to.

And when the post and thread is from 2006, like Negative Factor
Loading, Giganews (my ISP) happens to archive the messages
for that long; but not everyone will have ready access.
- In this instance, I also found the original thread by Googling
the Subject and SPSS, which was handy since your Reply
was posted as linked to the Original Poster, and not to the
Reply by Murphy.

--
Rich Ulrich

khadijabe...@gmail.com

unread,
May 8, 2018, 10:21:48 PM5/8/18
to
Hi how can give me interpretations of spss i have a projet
0 new messages