Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

SRV-records not resolved

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Martin Rådbo

unread,
Oct 25, 2003, 1:00:47 PM10/25/03
to
Please see the dns data above.

We try to use a simple srv-string, there we want people surfing to
www.latitud.net to be directed to www1 under normal circumstances and to
www2 if www1 is down.

The problem is that the client surfning to the website (with IE 6.0 and
Windows XP) does not resolve anything at all. We tried to check whats wrong
with the two srv-strings but without success.

Anyone?

Thanks in advance
// Martin
==================================
; bind data for Latitud.net
;
$TTL 3600
@ IN SOA latitud.net. postmaster.latitud.net. (
2003102512 ; Serial
3600 ; Refresh
900 ; Retry
604800 ; Expire
900 ) ; Negative Cache TTL
;
@ IN NS dns.latitud.net.
@ IN NS dns2.latitud.net.
;
dns IN A 213.15.68.93
dns2 IN A 213.15.68.94
;
www1 IN A 213.15.68.94
www2 IN A 217.215.140.235
;
_http._tcp.www.latitud.net. 3600 IN SRV 0 0 80 www1
_http._tcp.www.latitud.net. 3600 IN SRV 10 0 80 www2
;
latitud.net. IN A 213.15.68.94

p...@icke-reklam.ipsec.nu

unread,
Oct 28, 2003, 1:44:13 AM10/28/03
to
"Martin Rådbo" <mar...@pleasereplytonewsgroup.com> wrote:
> Please see the dns data above.

> We try to use a simple srv-string, there we want people surfing to
> www.latitud.net to be directed to www1 under normal circumstances and to
> www2 if www1 is down.

> The problem is that the client surfning to the website (with IE 6.0 and
> Windows XP) does not resolve anything at all. We tried to check whats wrong
> with the two srv-strings but without success.

> Anyone?

There is no srv record visible from Internet. Otherwize it looks fine to me.

You biggest problem is convincing ie to ask for SRV records.


> Thanks in advance
> // Martin
> ==================================
> ; bind data for Latitud.net
> ;
> $TTL 3600
> @ IN SOA latitud.net. postmaster.latitud.net. (
> 2003102512 ; Serial
> 3600 ; Refresh
> 900 ; Retry
> 604800 ; Expire
> 900 ) ; Negative Cache TTL
> ;
> @ IN NS dns.latitud.net.
> @ IN NS dns2.latitud.net.
> ;
> dns IN A 213.15.68.93
> dns2 IN A 213.15.68.94
> ;
> www1 IN A 213.15.68.94
> www2 IN A 217.215.140.235
> ;
> _http._tcp.www.latitud.net. 3600 IN SRV 0 0 80 www1
> _http._tcp.www.latitud.net. 3600 IN SRV 10 0 80 www2
> ;
> latitud.net. IN A 213.15.68.94


--
Peter Håkanson
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.

Barry Finkel

unread,
Oct 28, 2003, 10:37:11 AM10/28/03
to
"Martin Rådbo" <mar...@pleasereplytonewsgroup.com> wrote:

>Please see the dns data above.
>
>We try to use a simple srv-string, there we want people surfing to
>www.latitud.net to be directed to www1 under normal circumstances and to
>www2 if www1 is down.
>
>The problem is that the client surfning to the website (with IE 6.0 and
>Windows XP) does not resolve anything at all. We tried to check whats wrong
>with the two srv-strings but without success.
>
>Anyone?

Outside of MS Windows 2000/2003, very few applications use SRV records.
So, you can add them to your DNS zone, but no one will be querying
them. I do not know of an easy way to direct users to www2 if www1 is
down, outside of a load balancer (which is not DNS-related).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Barry S. Finkel
Computing and Instrumentation Solutions Division
Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277
9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601
Building 222, Room D209 Internet: BSFi...@anl.gov
Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994


Martin Rådbo

unread,
Nov 3, 2003, 7:49:54 AM11/3/03
to
Thanks for these answers. We have also realized that IE does not support
SRV-records.

This is a pitty because as an ISP we can make everything fault tolerance
inside our net (with load balancing, raid, double servers and so on)
but if we have two different internet connections from outside, there is n=
o
way
to direct our customers to the second line then the first line fails.

Of course there is a way:
register a second (or third) dns for the domain name pointing to the secon=
d
line, but the caching problem is impossible to solve. People will get
redirected not before their dns has released the cached information and th=
at
is not usable.

// Martin


"Barry Finkel" <b19...@achilles.ctd.anl.gov> skrev i meddelandet
news:bnntio$q88$1...@sf1.isc.org...


> "Martin R=E5dbo" <mar...@pleasereplytonewsgroup.com> wrote:
>
> >Please see the dns data above.
> >
> >We try to use a simple srv-string, there we want people surfing to

> >www.latitud.net to be directed to www1 under normal circumstances and t=


o
> >www2 if www1 is down.
> >

> >The problem is that the client surfning to the website (with IE 6.0 and=

0 new messages