No, no and no.
My original point -although unclear- is about interpretation of quantitative imaging. An MR image comes from a *single* source. Typically one of Siemens, GE or Philips (Toshiba, UIH ... more recently).
In order to interpret the quantitative parameters of the Extended SOP Class instance, you need to clearly identify this source. In my initial proposal, I was suggesting to use (0008,0070) Manufacturer since it is *not* listed in any Application Level Confidentiality Profile Attributes (part15). I assumed until a few weeks ago that it would the most reliable attribute for this work. One the source is identified (eg. Siemens), then and only then one can load and interpret the extended attributes.
As explained at least one vendor (Siemens) is producing MR Image Storage instances without this attribute set (with a value). So one need to come up with an alternate implementation to identify the original source.
I absolutely do not buy the argument that one day, a private vendor will re-use private attributes for quantitative parameter from another different vendor. This is not happening today and will never happen in the future. I gave the example of diffusion b-value I could have taken other (ASL, MTR ...). GE is never going to incorporate Siemens CSA in lieu of PDB header.