I have just watched the following video about neo-nazis of Russia

[Sky89]

Hello..

Read this:


I have just watched the following video about neo-nazis of Russia, look
at this video about them and i will talk about them bellow:

Horrific Documentary on Russian Neo Nazis part 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aLUxuq-E9yA


I am also a "white" arab, and i am more "civilized", this is why i know
more about white neo-nazis, because i underdand more the spirit of
neo-nazis, there spirit also look like the far right in politics,
i know about the far right and i know about neo-nazis, and i am
a more serious computer programmer that has invented many scalable
algorithms, and i think i will sell some of them to software companies
like Embarcadero and to Google etc. now i don't agree with the spirit
of neo-nazis because it is a spirit that is more like a "closed" system
centered around whites, this is an archaism , because neo-nazis have to
understand that "immigration" today that is in accordance with the law
of the counties is a more "optimized" or "selective" immigration
that has as a goal to optimize more the economy and to optimize more the
system, we are bringing immigrants because
we want to enhance economy and to enhance the system, and neo-nazis
have not to be extremist about that, we have to be more open to
"immigration" to become more "rich", i think that the spirit
of the far right and of the neo-nazis brings more "poverty" because
it is more stupid ! this is why i don't agree with neo-nazis
and with the far right because they are extremism that is archaism
today. This is why i said about social Liberalism the following:

About social Liberalism..

You have to understand the big picture, social Liberalism is
the social Liberalism of for example Hillary Clinton , now
what is not understanding "nationalism" like the one of neo-nazism,
is that since social Liberalism is also oriented towards being a
better "optimization" of the economy, so social Liberalism is not
considering only the fact of being of a white race, but it is also
taking into account the requirements for a better optimization of
economy and also the system, this is why it is bringing more educated
"immigrants" to do better the jobs and more experienced "immigrant"
workers to do better the jobs, so "racial" nationalism that is archaism
today is not capable of understanding what is it to be a better
optimized economy and a better optimized system.

Also i said the following about islamism:

About the reality of islamism..

Islamism like the one of ISIS or Al Qaida say that the majority
of the populations in the muslim countries are muslims, but i think that
they are not correct to say so, because look for example at the results
of the 2016 elections of Morocco where the islamists have won:

The participation rate was only 43%, illustrating the disinterest of
many Moroccans, especially young people, for ballot boxes.

An Islamist group, Justice and Charity (Forbidden but Tolerated), which
called for a boycott, said the rate was "inflated" and said it did not
exceed 26%.

and the PJD has won only 125 deputies.. so i think since there
is a disinterest of the majority of Moroccans, especially young people,
for ballot boxes, and since the islamists have only won a fraction of
the participation rate that is 43%, so i think that
Morocco can "not" be called a muslim country, since i think the majority
are not muslim in Morocco and this is the same for many muslim countries.

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.la-croix.com%2FMonde%2FMaroc-islamistes-remportent-legislatives-2016-10-08-1300794816



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.