Hello...
More philosophy about the traditional Japanese lifestyle..
So look carefully at the following video of everyday life in bygone days in Tokyo in year 1966:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvoZjbp9R1w
I am a white arab and i think i am smart, and when i just looked at the above video , i have just detected an important "pattern" with my fluid intelligence, and it is that Japanese of year 1966 were people that were apt at knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life and how to appreciate order, so then they were knowing how to be respect too so
that to be order, and order and respect can be considered pleasures of life, so i think that they were happy people, and knowing how to appreciate simple pleasures of life like were doing the Japanese of 1966 is a very important rule in philosophy because it avoids desorder in a society, the second rule in philosophy that avoids desorder in a society is that you have to know how to be the "effort" of being order and responsability.
So notice the first rule above, i mean the rule of you have to know
how to appreciate simple pleasures of life since it bring happiness too,
so look at the following american dream of Micheal Jackson and you will
notice that Micheal Jackson have died of a Drug Overdose even if he has
been very rich or he was rich, so i think he was a person that didn't
know how to appreciate simple pleasures of life, so he was not a happy person even if he was very rich.
Look at the following video to notice:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R73DZkM9X6U
So how to appreciate simple pleasures of life ? read my following thoughts to know how:
About the american dream and about the american negroes...
Look carefully at the following video of a song about the american dream and about the american negroes:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWJrPzAUzAs
This video above also symbolizes the american dream and it also symbolizes the idiotic philosophy, so i think i am a philosopher and i will start by asking a smart question:
Can we all men marry a beautiful women ?
So from this kind of question you are feeling what is it to be
a correct philosophy, i mean that not all men can marry a beautiful women, so now you are understanding that you have to be a philosopher
that learns the way of philosophy, so look at the above video,
so do you notice that the video is like calling the people to behave like in the above video, i mean it is like calling the people to become all of them rich so that to be happy or/and it is like calling all the people to have beautiful womens etc. so that to be happy, but this is an illogical philosophy that is not in accordance with a correct philosophy, since the philosophy above symbolizes the american dream that is not possible to make real for all people, so i think i am a philosopher, so what do you think that i say about it? i say that the goal and the meaning of human life is about happiness, and you have to make a difference between being happy without being rich and
being rich and happy, because we can be happy without being rich,
and how to be happy ? it is by understanding correctly my philosophy
below, so here it is, and read it carefully:
Here is a very simple arabic meal that is delicious and inexpensive, look at it carefully:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJ7_9qio8fs
And this very simple arabic meal proves that you can be happy
with simple pleasures of life, even if you don't have high quality pleasures, read my following writing of my philosophy to understand it:
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I invite you to look at the following interesting video, because
it is also like philosophy, so look at it carefully and my
thoughts about it are below:
The story of my life - From a dream to reality
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wFsYY71wyk
I think that this swedish women is an artist and photographer
that is locally smart in what she is doing, since she is like creating
pleasures of life by showing us her videos of the beautiful Sweden's nature, but the weakness of what she is doing is that this swedish women
is not a philosopher like me, so she is not understanding correctly,
because she is thinking that happiness comes from those high quality pleasures of life of the so beautiful Sweden's nature that she is showing in her videos, but i think it is a mistake, since not all people have those "high" quality pleasures of life, so in my philosophy(read about it below) i am explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, this is why i am saying the following in my philosophy:
More philosophy about the great movie called Cast Away..
I invite you to look at the following short video of a great movie called Cast Away:
Academy Award®-winning filmmaker Robert Zemeckis and two-time Oscar winner Tom Hanks reunite to explore the blessings and heartache of fate and the survival of the human spirit. Tom Hanks gives one of the towering screen performances of all time as Chuck Noland, a FedEx systems engineer whose ruled-by-the-clock existence abruptly ends when a harrowing plane crash leaves him isolated on a remote island. As Chuck struggles to survive, he finds that his own personal journey has only just begun...
Look here at the following short video of this great movie called Cast Away:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zZ3UYd1UxA
I think you have to look or look again at this great movie, because when you are smart you will notice that the movie also learns you the way of my philosophy below, i mean that Chuck Noland in the video(that is Tom Hanks) is getting like more and more hungry for our kind of civilization by being isolated on a remote island and he is learning to understand the way of my philosophy below about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life, because by being isolated on a remote island he is also learning to appreciate our kind civilization and this is also from where comes happiness, so you have to be smart by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy about from where comes happiness and pleasures of life and by at the same time making the logical analogy with the great movie above that we call Cast Away:
So i will ask a philosophical question:
More philosophy about the hypothetical and the reality..
Do we have to measure it absolutely or relatively ?
This is an important question in philosophy:
So how do we have to measure happiness ? and is happiness real ?
So i think that the philosopher Albert Camus was not smart when he said that life is absurd, by saying the following:
"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."
So what is the right way to measure it ?
I think it is like science, since we are not yet perfect, so i think it is "hypothetical" to say that life is absurd like was saying the philosopher Albert Camus, because we have to to be pragmatic in science and measure it taking into account our "imperfections" and "limitations", so the are we happy must be measured in a pragmatic way, so then you can notice that my philosophy is more pragmatic, since it is explaining that happiness comes not only from pleasures of life, but it also comes from the alternance of being "hungry" for taking a rest and taking a rest or from the alternance of being hungry and eating a delicious meal, so happiness comes from the difficulties of life that make us more hungry for or make us appreciate much more the pleasures of life, so they make us more happy, and i think this is the secret of life, so then life is not absurd, since the meaning of life is that we are getting happiness from this kind of mechanism that looks like the alternance of the day and night from where comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so then we have to be careful by being selective of the kind of pleasures of life that make us happy so that for example to not be too much materialism that causes problems.
From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?
It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance , i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence.
More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely..
When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying:
"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."
But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd.
And also don't forget to read my following philosophy about human existence..
I have just created a webpage on my website here about my philosophy
about human existence, you can read it carefully here:
https://scalable68.godaddysites.com/f/my-philosophy-about-human-existence
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.