More political philosophy about politics..

[amin...@gmail.com]

Hello,


More political philosophy about politics..

I am a white arab, and i think i am like a genius since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, so i will invite you to look carefully at my following thoughts of my political philosophy about Morality:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


So if you are like a genius like me, you will notice that my philosophy above about Morality shows the "tendency" of the essence of Morality or Morality that is also seeking a "balance", and it doesn't get into the details, it is by logical analogy the same as what i am saying below about competition and collaboration, since i said that the best way is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, and it is by logical analogy the same as Democracy, since Morality of Democracy doesn't get into the details , but Democracy shows the "tendency" that it must not be "extremism" that harms Democracy and Morality of Democracy is "not" completely purifying from evil.

Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:

About more political philosophy about Democracy and the West..

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and i will
talk today about a very important thing, and i think it is
what we call "purifying" from evil, i think that the problem of
the West is that it is not understanding that Democracy
is not completely "purifying" from evil, but Democracy doesn't accept "extremism" that harms it, this is the weakness of the West, people of the West are not understanding Democracy of the West, and here is what
i said about Democracy:

-------------------------------------------------------------------

More political philosophy about Democracy..

You have to understand more deeply Democracy, since Donald Trump is not here to please "all" americans, but we have to know about the essence
of Democracy, because Democracy is here because of constraints, since
there is a characteristics in morality that is a first protecting wall and there is a characteristic in Democracy that is a second protecting wall(read below to notice it), but you have to understand the essence of morality and the essence of Democracy, because Democracy doesn't mean that it is people that choose, because it is not in accordance with the essence of morality that must be the King(read below to notice it), since Democracy has been choosen because it is a system that is better at avoiding corruption than dictatorship(and corruption is also lack of efficiency of governance) and Democracy is a system that tries to give a choice and a voice that is a right , but our "duty" in Democracy is that we have not to be "extremism" that harms Democracy. So this is why i think that Donald Trump is not extremism of neo-nazism or white supremacism that harms Democracy, so we have to be patience and tolerance that is in accordance with Democracy and Morality.

-------------------------------------------------------------------


So as you are noticing i am clearly making you understand by
my thoughts above that Democracy is not completely purifying from evil and Democracy must not accept extremism that harms Democracy,
and now you are understanding that idiologies such
as Islamism or neo-nazism or white supremacism want like
to completely purify from evil and they are extremism so they do harm
Democracy.

More precision about political philosophy about Democracy..

You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when
i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity, so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute
perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so
a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy
needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy, you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

Now why to be Democracy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.


More political philosophy about morality..

I think i am more smart, and i think that "confidence" is part
of the game of being a society or humanity, so we have to know how to
bring confidence so that the society and humanity be able to work correctly, and so that to bring confidence we have to know how to be the right tolerance and the right patience, and since also we are not all beautiful, read the following to notice it:

Not everyone is beautiful

https://theconversation.com/not-everyone-is-beautiful-35915


So confidence must take into account this fact and be the right tolerance and patience that bring confidence in the system.


And read my following thoughts of my political philosophy about
Morality:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4

Why Mistakes Matter in Creating A Path For Learning

Read more here:

https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/48770/how-making-mistakes-primes-kids-to-learn-better

More political philosophy about competition or collaboration..

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart, and today
i will talk about do we have to be collaboration or competition ?
so as you are noticing that nationalism and individualism are
too much competition and communism and socialism are too much
collaboration, so we have to be more smart since i think that
the best ideology is to seek a balance between competition and
collaboration and since this way of doing also permits us to
avoid to be a violent society by still being good for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet
with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" in internet,
for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and
it is of course collaboration, so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads


Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.

More political philosophy about Communism..

There is one big problem with communism, and of communism of China, you can know about it by contrasting a too centralized and not too centralized and by logically inferring the advantages and disadvantages, the main problem of communism is a problem of diversity, and what is it to be the right diversity? and now you are understanding that to be more efficient and since i am thinking and writing rapidly and this is the constraint, i have to proceed like by proving by logical contradiction, so how can i make you feel the main problem of Communism of China or Communism? so by like a proof by logical contradiction i will ask the following: can you learn what is darkness by just looking and analyzing the lightness ? so now you are immediately noticing that we are also learning from the darkness and we are also learning from lightness ! so i think this diversity is necessary ! because it is right that we have to know how to prevent mistakes, but we are also learning by making mistakes ! and i say that both the way of prevention and the way of making mistakes are very important ! so this is the main problem of dictatorship of Communism, it is too centralized and it is lacking on diversity and it is thus lacking on both the way of learning by making mistakes and the way of prevention, and i say that in Democracy people has to be prepared to learn by making mistakes and by being prevention ! i will give you an example so that you understand rapidly, read the following about this big problem or weakness of being too centralized of dictatorship of Communism:

About agility and flexibility..

We have to be more smart, so i will invite you to
look at the following video about the Israel army:

Why is the ISRAELI ARMY so POWERFUL? - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jdgg0uDhrOs&t=450s


You will notice that the english person that is talking
in the video is not "technical" about the methodology and is
not speaking about the "inside" of the methodology,
and the methodology of the Israel army is agility
and flexibility that comes from the following, read my following
posting to understand about it:

Managing complex programs – standardize and decentralize for efficiency and agility

Read more here:

http://www.reddal.com/insights/managing-complex-programs-standardize-and-decentralize-for-agile-control/

And notice that the web link above is related to the following agile methodology:

What is agile methodology? Modern software development explained

Read more here on InfoWorld:

https://www.infoworld.com/article/3237508/what-is-agile-methodology-modern-software-development-explained.html

More political philosophy about civilization..

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability, and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste
that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste:

Why we should stand up for good taste

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.