Yet more of my philosophy about USA and black americans..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,



Yet more of my philosophy about USA and black americans..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I think i am smart, and i will say that american culture in USA is
not a caring culture, and it is too much violence that lacks much "safety", so it looks from outside to others like social darwinism, and
this kind of violent american culture in USA is what construct the collective imaginary, and black americans are also participating too much to this violent culture of USA, this is why the collective imaginary brought by this violent american culture is that we are looking at black americans as violent people and we are looking at black people as violent people, so we are discriminating them much more, and we are looking at USA as a violent country and this is causing problems to consumerism since the other countries are not wanting of this violent culture of USA since they don't want there people to be contaminated by it, so this violent culture of USA causes that it brings more dictatorship countries to our world and it brings more violence and more problems etc.

Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about USA and black americans..

I think i am smart and i think i am a wise type of person, and i will
say that the problem that we are having today also comes from the
fact that american culture in USA spreads a much more violent culture that is causing problems to our world, for example sex in this american culture of USA has become much more violent and there is too much violence in this american culture of USA, and i think it is what is making black americans much more discriminated since black americans are also spreading there violence into this american culture of USA, so then we can easily notice that it is causing a big problem to consumerism, since the other countries are not wanting this violent american culture of USA.

More of my philosophy about Algeria..

I invite you to look at the following video about Algeria:

Algeria's history in 5 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jD0BfXZR8AA

I think i am smart and i say the following in arabic since i also
write and talk and understand arabic and french and english:

"Ana' afhamo al 3arabiyyato jayyidan, fa anaa idan afhamo ma' yuqaalo fii al barnaamaj alladii qaddamtuhu ilaykum fii al fidioo al fawq"

It means in english:

"I understand arabic and i understand correctly what is said in the above video."

So what i want to say about the above video, that i think that in
the video above they are talking out of context, and the context
is that there was a civil war in Algeria fought between the Algerian government and various Islamist rebel groups from 26 December 1991 (following a coup negating an Islamist electoral victory) to 8 February 2002, so it was like the civil war in Syria today, here it is, read about it carefully:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algerian_Civil_War

So i think that the above video is making a mistake, since when
there was a civil war in Algeria, there was in this civil war supporters of Islamist rebel groups among the population of Algeria that helped and was helping the Islamist rebel groups that fought the Algerian government, so then some of those supporters Islamist rebel groups among the population of Algeria have been killed , this is why the Algerian on the above video was thinking that those supporters were just the Algerian people and he was concluding naively that this kind of Algerian government was a government that was constituted of like of french colonialists of Algeria that don't like the people of Algeria, but i think that it is a mistake to say so since i have just explained it above.

Now about islamism in general, i think i am a reformer of Islam and
here is what i have just said about Islam, read it carefully:

More of my philosophy about what is Islam..

I think i am smart and think i am a reformer of Islam, and i think that Islam is a beautiful religion, but i say that ISIS and Al Qaida and muslims are not understanding correctly Islam, and here is my thoughts of a reformer of Islam , and read them carefully so that you understand:

What is Islam ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that there is two types of laws of God, there is the timeless ones and not the timeless ones, and i am explaining it to you below so that you understand it, so the most important timeless laws of God are those of: Believing in God and glorifying him and praying him and fear him and ask him for help, and from those timeless laws you can derive the other human laws that are not timeless.

More of my philosophy about Salafism and more..

I say that there are two types of Islamic laws, there is Islamic laws from the Qur'an that are not timeless(read below about them), and here is more logical proof from my following thoughts about Salafism:

So i will first invite you to look at the following video about Salafism
in Europe:

Bosnia-Hercegovina: Islamists in Sarajevo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9oeSAoD6iU

So as you are noticing in the above video, that it shows islamists Salafists in Bosnia-Hercegovina, but the most important question is the following:

Is Salafism true Islam ?

I think i am a smart, and i will answer the question as the following:

First we have to ask if the Qur'an is timeless ?

So my smart answer is the following:

The Qur'an is not timeless because read the following verse of
the Qur'an:

Quranic verse 5:38: "As to the thief, male or female, cut off his or her hands: a punishment by way of example, from Allah, for their crime: and Allah is Exalted in power."

So if you are smart you will notice that the above verse of the Qur'an shows that the Qur'an is not timeless, since how can you imagine that the Qur'an doesn't enumerate the cases where we can be compassion on a thief and not cut his hands? so since it doesn't enumerate the cases, so then you are noticing that this verse of the Qur'an shows that the verse is not a timeless law, but it is a law that was applied in the context of the time where prophet Muhammad was living or such context, so then we can logically infer that the Qur'an is not timeless and then we can say that we can enhance many the laws of the Qur'an, so then Salafism is not true Islam since it says that the Qur'an and the laws of the Qur'an are timeless.

And i invite you to look at the following video:

A lady listens to lecture on Islam, then challenged me: 'Why is the Shariah Law so Barbaric?'

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1tplpm24CA

So as you notice that the lady asked why in Islam the Shariah Law is so Barbaric, and i think she is not understanding as muslims are not
understanding, and here is what i say:

In Islam there is two types of Islamic laws, and here they are:

1- The first kind of Islamic laws are laws that respect
the divinity of God, so we have to follow them since we have to
to glorify and respect the divinity of God, such as doing the prayers
etc..

2- Second kind of Islamic laws are laws related to society of humans or
order in a society of humans, so we have to follow those laws not
because we respect or glorify the divinity of God, but because we
follow those Islamic laws so that not to be disorder in a society, so
those kind of Islamic laws are not timeless and they depend on the
context, so then they can change.


I will give you a quick example so that you understand correctly:

For example the Islamic laws of cutting the hand of a thief or the laws
of killing the married women that practice adultery and such Islamic laws are of the second kind of laws above, since those laws avoid to the society to become disorder, so then they are not timeless and they can change, and i think that in the today context those laws
are not necessary and we can change them. And it is the same
for being gay, so we have to look at the being gay from the societal
point of view, so then the Islamic laws that rules the being gay are
of the second kind of laws above, so then i think that we can allow
the gays to marry between them, since it doesn't cause a disorder in a society.

More of my philosophy about Taliban and Islam..

I invite you to look at the following new video about Taliban:

Millions of desperate Afghans flee Taliban country ruled by war

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mpJnn2KLXw4

I have just noticed in the video above that a seignor minister in the Taliban government is talking to a white European journalist, but i have just noticed that he is not well educated, so i don't think that Taliban are following the rules of Islam since they are not well educated or correctly educated, second, in Islam you have first to be Islamic democracy so that to have different point views of Islamic political parties with less or more perfect ideas that permit Islam to advance correctly, so look for example at Islamic Iran, In Iran it is an Islamic democracy with different islamic political parties and with an islamic guide that we call Sayyid Ali Hosseini Khamenei(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Khamenei), so then Islamic Iran is a better Islamic governance than Taliban that is dictatorship, third, i also say that in Islam you have to know how to strengthen the faith in God, since without faith in God there is no muslim, so then you have to distinguish between the weak faith and the strong faith, since a weak faith in God can not be called a muslim, so then certain laws of Islam don't apply to humans that have a weak faith in God, so i say that before applying those certain laws of Islam to a human, you have to ask the human if he has a weak faith in God so that to distinguish and say that he is not a muslim, and then certain laws don't apply to him.

And here is the logical proof that God exist: Read the following of
outer body experiences and you will notice that the soul from God exists:

More proof of the existence of God..

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below,
it is the proof that the soul from God exists):

"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.

The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.

The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.

One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."

Read more here:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven

And read the following:

Does God exists ?

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full
awareness with explicit recall of “seeing” and “hearing” events – or
out-of-body )

Read more here:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.