About human genetics and the difference between a qualitative and quantitative analysis

[amin...@gmail.com]

Hello,


About human genetics and the difference between a qualitative and quantitative analysis:

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i think that i am like a genius who has invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and i will make you understand more what about genetics of humans..

More about humans and science..

I will make you understand:

There is a difference between looking at humans externally to genetics and looking at genetics of humans, science is looking at genetics of humans and saying that there is "very" small differences in genetics of humans, but you have to understand it as a holistic or globalized view of science into genetics, it is not a localized view into genetics(such
as looking at genetical smartness), so this is why there is no human race in science, but those small differences in genetics of humans are making differences in the body outside genetics, so i think neo-nazis are making a mistake because scientifically there is no human race and there is no human races, there is only humans.

About National Vanguard and neo-nazis..

I think that this National Vanguard full of neo-nazis is
lacking on scientific education, because those neo-nazis are saying that human races do exist, but science says that there is only
humans, read the following in Scientific American to notice
it:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/the-concept-of-race-is-a-lie/

Here is National Vanguard:

https://nationalvanguard.org/


But by saying that there is no human races, I think science is measuring human genetics much more quantitatively than qualitatively, because we can say that there is no races because quantitatively there is only very small differences in genetics between humans, but qualitatively we can say that for example human smartness (or such a localized view into
genetics) has a "great" weight of importance, so if you prioritize
by weights of importance, so then the weights of importance can create
a great differences between humans, so then it is as there is human races by measuring it qualitatively, it is also by logical analogy as the difference between an abstraction of a simulation of a real dynamic system in programming and the real dynamic system. This is why you will notice that in my following thoughts about universality of beauty that i am measuring it qualitatively, read again to notice it:


Is beauty universal ?

I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:

Look at the following webpage from BBC:

The myth of universal beauty

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty

So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about
beauty:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"


So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart,
i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal,
so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and
understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.