Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Exascale computing
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
Aug 12, 2015, 7:09:55 PM8/12/15
to
Hello,
``As the time to the first Exascale system gets shorter, it is clear
that MPI+X will be an important, and possibly the dominant, programming
system for those Exascale systems. This is because MPI has demonstrated
remarkable scalability over the past twenty years and because the
ability to combine MPI with other programming systems (the
"X" in MPI+X) has allowed MPI to concentrate on internode communication
while "X", be it OpenMP, OpenACC, CUDA, or something else, provides an
intranode programming system.``
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
``As the time to the first Exascale system gets shorter, it is clear
that MPI+X will be an important, and possibly the dominant, programming
system for those Exascale systems. This is because MPI has demonstrated
remarkable scalability over the past twenty years and because the
ability to combine MPI with other programming systems (the
"X" in MPI+X) has allowed MPI to concentrate on internode communication
while "X", be it OpenMP, OpenACC, CUDA, or something else, provides an
intranode programming system.``
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages