Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
96% of jobs, those who do not seek human ingenuity, are destined to disappear due to AI, according to Gary Kasparov
1 view
Skip to first unread message
amin...@gmail.com
Feb 29, 2020, 2:36:08 PM2/29/20
to
Hello,
96% of jobs, those who do not seek human ingenuity, are destined to disappear due to AI, according to Gary Kasparov.
Kasparov wants to be clear: artificial intelligence is a tool that will dominate in closed systems designed by humans.
The former chess champion also put the issue of basic universal income on the table to help the unemployed due to the introduction of artificial intelligence.
If everyone agrees that AI and automation will cut many jobs, the discord lies in the impact on the general level of employment. In other words, could the number of jobs created in other sectors compensate for the job losses in the sectors affected by automation? Sam Altman (co-founder of OpenAI) answered the question at the New York Times New Work Summit midway through the previous year: artificial intelligence will probably replace most of today's jobs, but it should lead the way more personalized jobs and a massive increase in "material abundance" which could increase world GDP by 50% per year for a few decades.
Read more here:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fintelligence-artificielle.developpez.com%2Factu%2F295132%2F96-pourcent-des-emplois-ceux-qui-ne-sollicitent-pas-l-ingeniosite-humaine-sont-appeles-a-disparaitre-du-fait-de-l-IA-d-apres-Gary-Kasparov-le-champion-du-jeu-d-echecs-vaincu-par-Deep-Blue-d-IBM-en-1997%2F
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
96% of jobs, those who do not seek human ingenuity, are destined to disappear due to AI, according to Gary Kasparov.
Kasparov wants to be clear: artificial intelligence is a tool that will dominate in closed systems designed by humans.
The former chess champion also put the issue of basic universal income on the table to help the unemployed due to the introduction of artificial intelligence.
If everyone agrees that AI and automation will cut many jobs, the discord lies in the impact on the general level of employment. In other words, could the number of jobs created in other sectors compensate for the job losses in the sectors affected by automation? Sam Altman (co-founder of OpenAI) answered the question at the New York Times New Work Summit midway through the previous year: artificial intelligence will probably replace most of today's jobs, but it should lead the way more personalized jobs and a massive increase in "material abundance" which could increase world GDP by 50% per year for a few decades.
Read more here:
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fintelligence-artificielle.developpez.com%2Factu%2F295132%2F96-pourcent-des-emplois-ceux-qui-ne-sollicitent-pas-l-ingeniosite-humaine-sont-appeles-a-disparaitre-du-fait-de-l-IA-d-apres-Gary-Kasparov-le-champion-du-jeu-d-echecs-vaincu-par-Deep-Blue-d-IBM-en-1997%2F
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages