Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
About my new SeqlockX algorithm
3 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramine
Mar 6, 2015, 8:06:38 PM3/6/15
to
Hello,
My new SeqlockX algorithm has elminated a weakness of the classical
Seqlock algorithm: it has completly eliminated the "livelock" when there
is more writers.
This was my improvement over the scalable Seqlock classical algorithm.
I have just benchmarked my new scalable SeqlockX algorithm , and i have
noticed that it's much more scalable and much faster than the Dmitry
Vyukov's distributed reader-writer mutex.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
My new SeqlockX algorithm has elminated a weakness of the classical
Seqlock algorithm: it has completly eliminated the "livelock" when there
is more writers.
This was my improvement over the scalable Seqlock classical algorithm.
I have just benchmarked my new scalable SeqlockX algorithm , and i have
noticed that it's much more scalable and much faster than the Dmitry
Vyukov's distributed reader-writer mutex.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Ramine
Mar 6, 2015, 8:19:28 PM3/6/15
to
On 3/6/2015 8:06 PM, Ramine wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> My new SeqlockX algorithm has elminated a weakness of the classical
> Seqlock algorithm: it has completly eliminated the "livelock" when there
I mean it has completly eliminated the livelock of the readers when
> Hello,
>
>
>
> My new SeqlockX algorithm has elminated a weakness of the classical
> Seqlock algorithm: it has completly eliminated the "livelock" when there
there is many writers...
0 new messages