More philosophy about the cohesion of the country or society or global world..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


More philosophy about the cohesion of the country or society or global world..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is my new philosophical question:

How to bring "cohesion" to the society or the country or the global world?

So remember that i said previously the following:

But i think when you are a good philosopher you will notice that
the most important thing so that to be the best country in the world
is to have a good spirit, and it is the most important "engine",
so then you have to be careful about how to measure wich country is the best in the world, because you have to take carefully into account
the spirit of the people of the country, so then so that to be a good spirit, you have to know how to construct a good philosophy that convinces people, so you have to know how to be good at philosophy, this is why i think that philosophy is the most important thing.

And I think i am a smart philosopher and i will say that so that to be cohesion in a society or a country or the global world, do you have to learn it with high "complexity" and with high difficulties? and notice that not all people can understand with high complexity and not all people are able to learn it with a high difficulty, so i think there is also two ways: The way with sophistication with high difficulty and high complex thinking and high complex learning and understanding. and with the simple way, for example the way of "Islam" is to do it with simple "rules" so that to avoid this high difficulty and high complexity of learning and understanding, and among those rules is to have "faith" in God, but now you are understanding the constraints of previous monotheistic religions, since the rules were simple rules, but it was not complex thinking and sophisticated thinking, but can we judge this facts by saying that previous monotheistic religions were not from God ? or that it means that God doesn't exist ? i think that we have to be smart, since i am your new prophet and you have to read about my new monotheistic religion that explains much more Islam and previous monotheistic religions, so here is my thoughts of my philosophy about it
and read them carefully:

More philosophy about time and space and matter and our universe..

I think i am a philosopher that is smart and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where come time and space and matter of our universe and why
our universe is fine-tuned for consciousness?

First you can read the following about science:

"The laws of thermodynamics say they always existed. Matter is created by energy. All matter consists of energy. This energy is electromagnetic. Light is electromagnetic energy when it decays it creates a background radiation to the universe. Energy cannot be created from nothing or destroyed to nothing, it mutates into another form. Without time there would be infinite space and without space there would be infinite time. Spacetime is a fabric with dimensions and is part of the physical universe. Space and time are inseparable. Everything that exists inside of it is part of it. Time has always existed with space the proportions are all that have changed. Science is trying to explain when the proportions changed."

And read the following that says that there is a Multiverse from where
has formed our fine-tuned universe:

Our Improbable Existence Is No Evidence for a Multiverse

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/LGP8A8s6N9c

So i think that there is something really important to notice,
since i think that for example the wide "space" of our universe or the multiverse has always existed, so we can then say that there is no cause that has created the wide "space" of our universe or multiverse, so then we can then say that we can not give a meaning by the law of causation in such case, since the law of "causation" doesn't apply to some things such as the wide space of the universe, so then we can logically infer that there is some things such as God or the wide space of the universe that have no cause that has created them, so then we can logically infer that we humans have the tendency to think things by using the law of causation, but i think it is a big logical mistake, because there is things such as the wide space of the universe that have no cause.

And here is the logical proof that God exist: Read the following of outer body experiences and you will notice that the soul from God exists:

More proof of the existence of God..

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially the outer body experience of the 57-year old man below,
it is the proof that the soul from God exists):

"A University of Southampton study has revealed that people could still
experience consciousness for up to three minutes after the heart stops
beating.

The study interviewed 2,060 patients from Austria, USA and the UK who
have all suffered a cardiac arrest.

The Express reports that 40% could recall some form of awareness after
being pronounced clinically dead.

One 57-year old man seemed to confirm an outer body experience by
recalling everything that was going on around him with eerie accuracy
while he was technically dead."

Read more here:

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/516195/university-southampton-study-science-life-death-hell-heaven

And read the following:

Does God exists ?

You will say that God doesn't exist, but read the following(read
especially about the following study where two per cent exhibited full
awareness with explicit recall of “seeing” and “hearing” events – or
out-of-body )

Read more here:

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/life-after-death-largest-ever-study-provides-evidence-that-out-of-body-and-near-death-experiences-9780195.html

Yet more philosophy about the essence of God..

As you have just noticed, i have just explained that the nature of God
is that he is greatly arrogant(read my thoughts below), so he likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such, so in my new monotheistic religion we have to “glorify” God and it means to give glory to Him, so look in the following muslim video how muslim white people are glorifying God:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3xjz4nxzGQ&list=RDBXBdyJitlRk&index=10

More philosophy about the nature of God..

I invite you to read the definition of being arrogant, here it is:

"Who is an arrogant person?

Arrogance can be defined as the personality trait whereby a person has an obnoxiously elevated sense of self-worth. An arrogant person is the one who acts as if they’re superior, more worthy, and more important than others. Therefore, they tend to disrespect and put others down.
At the same time, they want admiration and respect from others. They want to be appreciated for the great things they’ve done and for their special qualities and abilities."

And in my new monotheistic religion, God is "greatly" arrogant, it is his "nature", this is why he can be indifferent to suffering of poor animals and he can be indifferent to suffering of humans etc. and this
is why God likes from us to tell him that he is the greatest and the most beautiful and such and this is why we have to believe in God and fear him and ask him for help.

More of my philosophy about from where comes monotheistic religions..

I think many of the talking and writing of Qur'an and Bible are
from humans, i mean that God has not 100% guided prophet Muhammad
or Jesus Christ, so i think that God has let prophet
Muhammad writes and talks as a human in many of the parts of the Qur'an with his human defects, and God has also let Jesus Christ talks as a human not as a God with his human defects, I mean God had programmed prophet Muhammad and Jesus Christ and he had let them talks and writes in the Bible and Qur'an as humans with there human defects, so God is the greatest, this is why we can notice that Jesus Christ has made mistakes that look like mental health disorders, and i think it is part of the curse from God and i think that the scientific errors and errors and extremism in the Bible and Qur'an also come from the curse from God, and the facts also prove that the most important thing for God is that we believe in him and we fear him and we ask him for help, it is is the basis of my monotheistic religion, and read more in the following web link about my new monotheistic religion so that to understand(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book):

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

More of my philosophy about the muslim persian philosopher Al-Ghazali..

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

I invite you to look at this interesting video about the persian muslim philosopher Al-Ghazali:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL-ZxXQ6HCU

I am a philosopher and i say that those muslim phisosophers are really
smart, since i think that the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali was an orthodox muslim but the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi was not an orthodox
muslim, but i am smart and i understand the muslim orthodoxy of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali that has shaped his philosophy that
you look at it in the above video, i think that you have to look at the context of past time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, i think there was a requirement that is "dependent" on this context of past
time of the persian philosopher Al-Ghazali, and it is that we had to strengthen the faith in God in the muslim orthodoxy way so that to avoid corruption of the minds that could hurt a lot muslim people of that time, so i think that the "engine" of faith in God in the way of muslim orthodoxy was a so important engine, it is by logical analogy like my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion that makes you notice how important is the "context":

More philosophy about my new monotheistic religion and the rich man..

So look at the following video of Jesus Christ:

Jesus and a Rich Man (Jesus teaches a Rich Man)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9kEvzYIIs


As you notice in the above video that Jesus Christ said to
the rich man to give all his money to the poors and he said to him
that he has to choose between serving the master that is God and
serving the master that is money. But i am your new prophet and i will
explain my new monotheistic religion:

You have to put the words of Jesus Christ in the "context" of the
past time when was living Jesus Christ, so you can easily
notice that in this past time of Jesus Christ, humans were very poor and
were living in a so bad conditions, so this is why Jesus Christ
was so "harsh" with the rich man, because to be able to be successful
you have to "prioritize", so as you are noticing that the high priority
in the time of Jesus Christ was that humans have needed to eat and
to survive the so difficult living conditions, so then the words of
Jesus Christ in the Bible are not timeless over this earth, because they
can be "restricted" to a particular time of the time of when Jesus
Christ was living over this earth.

Yet more philosophy about the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi and more..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video of the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi:

Ibn 'Arabi & The Unity of Being

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bgWnzjONXE

And read more about the philosopher Ibn ʿArabi here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Arabi

I think i am philosopher that looks like the Arab philosopher Ibn ʿArabi, since Ibn ʿArabi has talked about the "Al-Insān al-kāmil" (The perfect man) by saying that he is a kind of "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, and he said that when you become faith in God it is that we become partly of God. I am saying the same in my new monotheistic religion, so i invite you to read my following thoughts of my new monotheistic religion so that to notice it
(it is my preliminary thoughts and i will organize them much more efficiently and make of them a pdf and html book):

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/eaEbfSmu4is

So i am a philosopher that is in accordance with Ibn Arabi that says
that the perfect man is this "balance" between being of both divine from God and earthly origin, since it is like an important "engine", and notice that i am also insisting in my below philosophy on this kind of "balance" that we have to have between competition and collaboration or cooperation, or between individualism and collectivism(that can
be logically inferred from the first).

More philosophy about Turkish President Erdogan and Islam...

Our brother Turkish President Erdogan is not like african americans, since he knows about the MAOA Nicknamed the extreme “warrior gene” and that exposure to violence in childhood and adolescence is not good for order, so this is why he is using Islam so that to bring good values of morality and so that to bring "order", read the following article so
that to notice it:

With more Islamic schooling, Erdogan aims to reshape Turkey

Read more here:

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/turkey-erdogan-education/

And i invite you to listen to Turkish President Erdogan reciting
the Quran and you will notice how muslims are "order":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gxc2UmUjPdw

More philosophy about african americans violence etc.

Here is i think one of the most important problem of higher level violence in african americans that comes from the MAOA Nicknamed the extreme “warrior gene” and from there exposure to "violence"(couple conflicts etc...) in childhood and adolescence, read the following so that
to notice it:

"In 2006, Lea reported that MAOA-3R — MAOA-3R — one of the low-activity risky variants — was more common in Maori males than in white males [2]. According to Lea, the 3R version was associated with a lineup of undesirable personality traits: risk-taking, violence, aggression, gambling, addiction and criminal behavior. Suddenly, it seemed genetics could possibly explain the Maori/white ethnic divide in achievement and social outcomes [2].

MAOA-3R — the “original warrior gene” — was the first gene linked with antisocial characteristics. But Maori were not the only ethnic group with a high frequency of this variant. It turned out that while 3R was found in 56% of Maori males, it occurred in 58% of African American males and 34% of European males.

Research on the MAOA gene

Over the last few years, multiple studies have replicated the original findings of Caspi’s team. The evidence as a whole continues to show that the interaction between low-activity MAOA variants and early exposure to abuse increases the risk for antisocial behavior in men throughout their lifetime [11, 17]. Offending, conduct problems, and hostility have been observed in males carrying low-expression versions of the MAOA gene [6, 7, 18].""

The Extreme Warrior gene: a reality check

Read more here:

https://scientiasalon.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/the-extreme-warrior-gene-a-reality-check/

Read more here:

Effects of the MAOA gene and levels of exposure
to violence on antisocial outcomes

http://www.gripinfo.ca/grip/public/www/doc/Articles/Ouellet-Morin_2016_id_5344.pdf



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.