Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
That's sad...
4 views
Skip to first unread message
aminer
Oct 11, 2013, 10:47:24 PM10/11/13
to
Hello,
Sorry there is still a problem, cause spin-wait in lockfree
and waitfree FIFO queues even with a sleep(0) (when for example there no
items in the queue) do not satisfy the requirement of the
energy efficency. That's sad i think, cause we have to use
my FIFO fair SemaCondvar or FIFO fair semaphores to satisfy
the requirement of energy efficiency, but SemaCondvar and Semaphores
are slow, that's sad.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Sorry there is still a problem, cause spin-wait in lockfree
and waitfree FIFO queues even with a sleep(0) (when for example there no
items in the queue) do not satisfy the requirement of the
energy efficency. That's sad i think, cause we have to use
my FIFO fair SemaCondvar or FIFO fair semaphores to satisfy
the requirement of energy efficiency, but SemaCondvar and Semaphores
are slow, that's sad.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages