About my logical proofs and views of my political model

[rami17]

Hello..............


About my logical proofs and views of my political model:

To stabilize and secure our world i have said that:

Economic integration with others and also economic investment render the
world more stable and more peaceful and more secure, and because
consumerism has to guide governance and consumerism is also the
consequence of compassion and respect, because to not hurt consumer
confidence index you have to know how to be compassion and respect. This
is the solution of the problem between Israel and arab countries, they
must have more economic integration and more economic investment between
them to be more peace and stability.

Other than that you have to know how to tune compassion and respect to
not hurt consummer confidence index internationally and locally.

This is an important factor to be able to tune well the political
philosophy that must guide governance, you have also to think governance
by knowing how to tune economic investing into the third world
countries, this is mandatory, to be more precise i will say that you
have to know that like Fordism, consumerism has also to guide our
political philosophy, and consumerism is a consequence of respect and
compassion, so this is very serious, and the essence of America is
constructed on this fact, so adding this principle to my model will get
you on the right path, here is the rest of my model that i have enhanced:

About extremist nationalism and communism..

Extremist nationalism like the far-right or neo-nazi political parties
is an archaic thinking that causes violence and extremism and
instability, communism is the same, so we have to be wiser
and understand that this kind of extremism has also to be avoided
by knowing the following:

"The economic models developed by the development economists of the
1960s, based on the idea of industrializing industries, seem to be
losing more and more of their unconditional supporters. The economic
development of a country or a region is no longer Dependent on the
development of the secondary sector or heavy industry. "
by M'Fadel El Halaissi, of which our readers are familiar, is Deputy
Chief Executive Officer of BMCE Bank.

Please read more here(you have to translate it from french to english,
because it is in french), it's from the Economist Magazine in Morocco
my country:

http://www.leconomiste.com/article/915791-la-conqu-te-conomique-de-l-afrique-passe-par-le-secteur-des-servicespar-m-fadel-el-ha

But we can not have confidence in people, we have to enforce
morality with laws, but morality is not something easy ,
because morality is not just a priori pure moral, morality
is infered also from empirical moral that is also from power and
counter-power, but we are more lucky today because empirical moral is
not so bad, because i have said that: Past was the past, but today it is
different, we are getting world stability from the power and the
counter-power, so we not just have governance and/or democracy that is
the power of people, but also we have the counter-power of the financial
and banks institutions that have there rating methodology that take into
account the Political Risk factor and the economic conditions, and we
have the counter-power of the consummers confidence index, and this
creates a world stability because we have to optimize our economic
systems and by being responsable by being also responsable governance,
other than that compassion and respect can be virility and they are like
mandatory for the system, because compassion and respect gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion and respect cause violence and
extremism that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion and respect right with social services and medical services
and with educational services and with help to the people to avoid
violence and extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this
compassion and respect is virility, other than that you have to know how
to tune compassion and respect to not hurt consummer confidence index
internationally and locally.


And about immigration:

Virility and usefulness

We have to do more philosophy..

There is some of you who define virility as being courageous or violent..

But this is not the right way to define virility..

You have to define it to know it:

Virility is maturity and also it is intelligence and it is
money and it is knowledge and it is efficiency etc.

Virility is not just being violent or being courageous..

Now can we make this criterion of virility the criterion
at how we have to be selected as an immigrant ?

I don't think it is the right way..

Because to be accepted as an immigrant we have to be categorized
by the criterion of usefulness, this is optimization of today,
so to fulfil the goal of economic growth and economic efficiency
and to be able to give jobs to the right persons, we have to think
by the criterion of usefulness, this is how works USA and this is
how works Canada too, even if we select some immigrants taking also into
consideration human rights.

Knowledge changes your perception..

But quality of knowledge is also very important to set it right..

To overcome many constrains you have to know how to tune some
variables, like you have to know how to define usefulness,
and this is the weakness of neo-nazis like ideologies,
today optimization is defined by the criterion of usefulness,
and usefulness is not that arabs have to be as beautiful as
white europeans, this is the old way of thinking, so
usefulness to conform to the standards of today that
take into account efficiency of economy has been defined
differently than the neo-nazis kind of thinking, so
we have to adapt , because USA and Canada have to
optimize there economies taking into account many
constrains, because also usefulness is constrained
also by contrains and this is why USA and Canada
are getting more clever at defining usefulness and usefulness of
immigrants to better optimize there economies, so i am calling
to all of you to adapt to the reality of today, because
the past was the past, and today is today, so please adapt
yourself !

And more about the criterion of usefulness..

Optimization today is defined by usefulness..

But do you think that usefulness can be tuned exactly ?

No Sir, usefulness is constrained by some constrains that
make tuning of usefulness more an approximation than
an exact calculation, this is the weakness of the
far-right and neo-nazis kind of ideologies, you have
to know that tuning usefulness is still an approximation,
and this approximation sets optimization that sets
immigration.

So don't be immature and adapt yourself to today and to science !


About the essence of beautifulness..

You will say that beautifulness is good..

But if you are not as beautiful as the other, like arabs are not as
beautiful as white europeans, you can still enhance yourself by
executing rules like computers execute instructions to make
yourself more beautiful and/or more disciplined and/or more compassion
and/or love, by knowing that love and/or compassion and/or beautifulness
is the result/output also of executing rules without being compassion
or/and without being love and/or without being beautifulness is a kind
of discipline that must be learned by all, because this discipline can
solve many of our problems.

We have to set right our perception..

And you have to relearn how to walk right..

What says to me rationality and logic and measure ?

That compassion can be virility, because compassion gets us more
organized because neglecting compassion cause violence and extremism
that make our society unstable and less optimized , so tuning
compassion right with social services to people to avoid violence and
extremisme is also more stability and more power , so this compassion is
virility.

And in economy taking into account consumer confidence index , we have
to be more disciplined with compassion and respect towards others
like arabs and africans to not hurt our economy , this is the essence
of usefulness that sets right optimization and that sets also immigration.

So you have to be more disciplined in your thinking with more
rationality and logic and meaure to set it right.

About rationality and logic and measure..

As you have noticed i am doing political philosophy here using the tools
of philosophy that are rationality and logic and measure, but
i have learned a wisdom from that, that political philosophy must be
taken as a science, because the tools of philosophy that are rationality
and logic and measure are called "more science", and i have
learned another wisdom from my work on political philosophy is
that you have to be patient with political philosophy like
being patient with science, because in political philosophy you are
going step by step and layer by layer incrementally to attain the
goal to set your perception right, so you have to be patient to
wait for your perception to be set right, it is like doing science.

About hate..

I think some of you are still immature..

Because hating arabs and hating africans is not scientific,
you have to know that economy today is not just nationalism,
it is also companies like Boeing and Intel and many many others selling
to arabs and to africans, so you have to know how to tune compassion and
respect towards arabs and africans to not hurt consumer confidence index
and to not hurt economy, this is also science, and arabs and africans
also must know how to tune compassion and respect to attract more
investment and to be able to think bigger taking into account consumer
confidence index also.

Thinking bigger...

The weakness of neo-nazis and far-right like ideologies is that they
don't think bigger..

Economy today is thinking also bigger..

Many companies like Intel and Boeing etc. are thinking bigger,
so they are not thinking just nationalism, because to be able
to think bigger you have to know how to give respect to
arabs and to africans, and giving respect to arabs and to africans can
be also more investment in arab and african countries, and also
as you will notice that economic growth in arab and african
countries is higher than Europeans or American countries,
so you have to know how to capture opportunities in economy
by knowing how to not hurt the consumer confidence index
by not hating arabs or africans and knowing also how to set respect by
investing on other countries..


Nationalism has to adapt and think bigger !

What do you think is survival ?

Survival is usefulness and it is also compassion and respect, this is
scientific, this is optimization, science is not hating stupidly,
you have to be the director of companies like Intel or Boeing to be able
to understand what i am saying, you are thinking small by hating
stupidly, and thinking small is not survival, you have to think bigger
and being more disciplined at thinking bigger ! you have to know how to
manage yourself and how to manage America ! stupidly hating is not
management and it is not science ! so you have to set your perception
right by listening to science and to wisdom , you are thinking like
optimizing is hating the other ! this is childish behavior of
nationalism of today ! so be capable at thinking bigger ! this
is the standards of today ! we have to think bigger to better
survive ! so don't be childish !

You have to know how to optimize economy too to be more powerful and
more organized, and the prerequisites is transcendence of inferiority
that lack optimization.

Morality is the same , it permits us to transcend , because
it gets us more organized and more efficient to better survive, and
because science is part of morality, because is laws part of morality ?
yes, because science also rules us with rules of optimization that has
as a goal to give more quality and more happiness to the people,
so this is part of good, so we have to enlarge our conception of what is
morality, thus including science as a part of morality is part of the
game today, this is part of the high standards of today, this view is
also enforced with the fact also that thinking bigger like thinking how
to be more scalable or as to be more organized world wide or as to be
world order and security is an essential part of requirements of today,
but it's necessary to know also that taking science alone as morality is
corruption , because science with more maximization and more
optimization can neglect the weakers among us , so science can be a kind
of horror like the horror of nazism, so
please be wiser and reread my following full text to
understand better my views:

About Stability and world order..

How to get stability and world order ?

You have to stabilize and secure the country also, and this has to be
done by searching for the rules to execute that avoid extremism and
violence, this is mandatory for our democracies, so i have told you to
notice that neglecting compassion and/or love and/or respect cause
violence and extremism and desorder, so you have not to neglect
them , and you have to know how to higher consumer confidence index
to better optimize economy world wide, so for that you have to know how
to avoid hate towards other people that causes problems to economy ,
because it hurts consumer confidence index, and you have to know to not
get into communism and to avoid extremism of communism because communism
is too extreme and its extremism causes violence, so you have to know
how to tune those variables of compassion and respect and love and how
to optimize the system, and how to do it ? by being for example more
social like being social democracy and or being social Liberalism, hope
you have understood my proof.. and this is not finished because you have
to think about immigration, and here is what i have said about immigration:

In parallel computer programming we have to optimize, like by
reducing the size of the serial part, and by reducing the cache
coherence traffic etc. and this to render your software or algorithm
scalable, so we are concerned by the scalability criterion..

Capitalism also wants to optimize, and capitalism says for example
that even arabs are not as beautiful as white europeans, it says that
arabs are tolerable, because capitalism wants to optimize economy
and the society by bringing arabs immigrants that are also decent
people, because today we are constrained by many factors, and
optimization has been rendered by those constrains to as the following:

If you are useful for something like jobs and economy or/and useful to
low birth rate of white europeans or/and you are useful to higher the
consumer confidence index and/or and you are useful to better the world
order and security , you can be welcome to USA or other countries..

About America and the world..

Before, operating systems like OS/2 of IBM were a monolithic OSs ,
but as the time has gone by we have developed more sophisticated
OSs like Mach 3 or Windows NT, those sophisticated OSs were more
decentralized and were designed in a such a way to be more efficient
and managed better, the difference between a monolithic one and not
monolithic one is like programming with message passing or Object
oriented programming, and we have also the tendency to decentralize the
management of our societies to be more efficient, it's the same
for capitalism , capitalism tries to optimize better by not
being as monolithic as the old way of thinking of Hitler, so
today because of constrains on optimization, usefulness is interpreted
not as being as beautiful as white europeans or being as civilized as
white europeans to better optimize the system economically.. it's
like decentralizing to better optimize, now to not get extremist,
you have to know how to tune correctly optimization to better optimize
and to not cause problems to societies.

And how can we be more civilized ?

I have done philosophy..

We have to measure it easily to know about it..

Science in fact is part of morality, but science alone as morality is
corruption of morality, because science is also performance and power
that dictates
to survive better, so then it dictates to neglect the weakers among us,
so then this is corruption of morality that permit us to measure
corruption of morality and thus to measure civilization, but
i repeat that science is part of morality , because performance and
power of science that solves our problems is also good, so this good is
part of morality, and we can measure civilization and morality by the
degree of the variable that is suffering, and you will measure morality
by the Ideal of justice and ideal of happiness that are part of our
essence, and that permit us to measure morality or measure
civilization, And empirical moral constrain performance and power to
not neglect the variables of compassion and respect and love
because neglecting them causes violence and/or extremism
and/or desorder, and this permit us also to measure morality or measure
civilization.

This is how we can measure morality and measure civilization.

So we have to be careful to not repeat foolishness of the past.

The ideal of justice and ideal of happiness..

If you say that this life is not fair and juste, that's not a measure,
because you have to measure the degree of suffering and the degree
of responsability, that means that justice must constrain happiness,
but justice must be constrained by responsability too, but how can we
constrain justice by responsability ? responsability can be interpreted
being principles of communism or being principles of social democracy
etc. so the the degree of tolerance is also a variable that influence
responsability, so if we are more tolerance we can refuse the principles
of communism because communism is a kind of justice that
is too extreme that can cause extremism and violence, so the tolerance
of social democracy or the tolerance of social Liberalism are more apt
to not cause extremism and violence and social democracy or
social Liberalism knows how to tune compassion and love and respect so
that to be decent compassion and love and respect , and so that to not
cause extremism and violence and desorder too.


About the essence of corruption of morality..

It's like doing philosophy..

You will say that since life is still unjust and not fair, so
how can we be still morality ? or how can you still speak of corruption
of morality ? since life is a difficult job and since when we are
treated unjustly and unfairly by life we have the tendency to neglect
high standards of morality.

This is not philosophy Sir ! this is stupidity !

Because justice has to constrain happiness..

And responsability has to constrain justice..

But responsability is influenced by the degree of suffering or
or by the degree of difficulty, so since life is still a difficult job,
so the variables of suffer and difficulty are important, so the higher
importance that we give to suffering and to difficulty, because
of life is still a difficult job, constrain responsability by making it
be more morality, not less morality.

So stupid people have the tendency to not think correctly.

About the essence of responsability..

I have said about morality that:

Justice has to constrain happiness..

And responsability has to constrain justice..

But responsability is influenced by the variable of tolerance ,
so if we are more tolerance we can neglect reponsability and
thus neglect justice and neglect morality.

And if we are also a kind of tolerance we can avoid the extreme justice
of communism. But this is not easy to convince communism, so to be
able to convince communism, you have to say to communism that
Class Struggle of communism is empirically difficult to realize because
it's too much violence, and since it's too much violence, so communism
must be avoided because it's too extreme justice that causes too much
violence.

So we have to be more wisdom to be better at tuning the variable
of tolerance to better optimize responsability.

Also i have just said this:

===
My proof about political ideologies..

I have taken a look at communism and capitalism, and i think there is
still a problem to clear , it's the one of the intellectual elites..

Intellectual elites can easily become rich because Intellectual
giftedness render the intellectual job for them easy and make them rich
quickly and more easily.

So there is a problem.

But there is still a proof, that an IQ of 110 can still find
difficult its job, so since there is still suffering for IQs of 110
, so we can not categorize easily those categories of IQ of 110
as becoming rich quickly and easily.

So communism has still a problem with intellectual Elites that has much
higher IQs including jews.
===


Here is my last proof on this that is more correct:

Since smart reusability of freely available knowledge is prevalent
today, so it's like socialism in disguise inside capitalistic countries
that can make you more rich and more intellectual.. so the above problem
is solved mostly.




Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.