More philosophy about the problem of optimality in the Adam Smith economic Liberalism..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

More philosophy about the problem of optimality in the Adam Smith economic Liberalism..

So i think that the problem of Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is a
problem of "optimality", so first you have to note that we are constrained by the fact that we have to avoid violence of economic Liberalism that is based on competition and that lacks cooperation or collaboration, and this of course shows that it is lacking "diversification" of products and services since we can notice that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make us much more creative and that's good for economy, other than that since economic Liberalism is based on self-interest and competition, so i think it is a too reductionist system, since the too reductionist system of self-interest and competition lacks one more variable that is the intellectual taste of the customers in economy, i mean that the customers needs a more enhanced intellectual taste so that to push the quality of products and services upward, so people of a society need to be well educated like in Democracy so that to have a good intellectual taste, and here what i said about it in my thoughts of my philosophy:

More of my philosophy about Niklaus Wirth and about the good taste..


Having good taste involves knowing what is truly excellent or of genuine value.


Read here to notice it:


What Is Good Taste?


https://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/03/what-is-good-taste.html


And as you have just noticed i have just posted the following thoughts of Niklaus Wirth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklaus_Wirth):


https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h_xKwu2gM44


And i think that Niklaus Wirth is too pessimistic on the above thoughts Since you have to know that an efficient education can permit to give you a good intellectual taste so that to be able to be efficiently selective, and this is valid for both the consumers and the producers of products or services.


And more of my philosophy about the good taste..


So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:


"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."


Read here in the dictionary to notice it:


https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste


But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.

So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..


More about "specialization" and "division of Labor" in economy..

As you have noticed i have just spoken about my kind of economic Coopetition and i just said that it is better than economic Liberalism, read about it below, now you have to understand that i am using abstract logical thinking by speaking by using efficient abstractions, so from my kind of economic Coopetition that is seeking like a balance between competition and cooperation or collaboration, we can logically infer that it is like inherent to this abstraction that so that to be efficient globally we need also specialization and division of Labor, read more about my kind of economic Coopetition below so that to understand more my philosophy, and i also said the following about complexity:

And how to manage efficiently complexity ?

I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can read more about the Division of labour here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour

Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality,

More about Bernard Arnault and about more about capitalism..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video that
shows more how capitalism is working efficiently by bringing good quality using competition and how also in capitalism creativity needs also collaboration and cooperation, and notice carefully how Bernard Arnault in the following video is playing it smartly like playing it smartly in a game of Chess and look carefully how he is even speaking
a good english since also speaking many languages is good for
efficiency:

Bernard Arnault, Chairman and CEO of LVMH | The Brave Ones

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRZvHxUJUoE

More of my philosophy about Adam Smith economic Liberalism..

Economic Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith says that self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations. But i can efficiently abstract more the abstraction of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith by saying that self-interest comes from competition since i can say that individual self-interest comes from competition between individualism and collectivism and from competition between the survival and the not survival, so i think we can efficiently abstract it more and say that in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith self-interest comes from competition and competition regulates to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating.

More philosophy about the psychology of the way of my Coopetition philosophy..

I think i am smart by talking as i am talking about economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, here in my thoughts of my philosophy and notice it:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

So notice carefully that i am saying in my web link above that my new philosophy that i call Coopetition is better than classical economic Liberalism, because read carefully in the above since i am saying that since we have not to "escape" my kind of Coopetition since it permits to efficiently avoid violence of economic Liberalism that comes from competition that lacks cooperation or collaboration, so then you will understand that my kind of Coopetition "diversify" much better the products and services that are regulated by self-interest and competition and that's much better for "creativity", since we can notice that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make us much more creative and that's good for economy.

I invite you to look at the following interesting video
that shows that capitalism also uses healthy competition
to bring good quality:

5 Reasons Guys Buy Luxury Items || Men's Fashion 2019 || Gent's Lounge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qMBFBAkLvI

So i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
about economic Liberalism and capitalism so that to understand my views, and you will notice that my philosophy also makes it clear that the way of my economic Coopetition is better than classical economic Liberalism:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc

Also here is my other thoughts of my philosophy, so i invite you to read them carefully:

And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI

And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw

And here is my new saying about capitalism:

If capitalism fails, it will be too much dangerous for humanity, so nationalism has the tendency to make capitalism fail, but capitalism has not to fail, this is why i don't like nationalism and this is why i am speaking about nationalism in the way i am speaking.

More of my philosophy about how USA has become powerful and rich..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following two videos about
MIT and Bill Gates, here they are:

REPORTAGE sur le MIT de Boston, La fabrique de génies

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag45W_FTTiM

Bill Gates

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8AsQ9TVKuA

And i think i am smart and i have just found with my smartness a pattern in the above videos that made USA so rich and powerful, and it is the following:

I think the pattern is that you have to invent by being creative and innovative and inventive and after that those inventions will bring big
money and after that big money will bring the smartest people from around the world to your country that also has made big money and they will follow the same pattern, this is the pattern that has followed USA so that to become powerful and rich.

And by logical analogy i have just said the following in my thoughts
of my philosophy that follows the same above pattern:

I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:

"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"

But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following interesting web page from Yale university:

What Is Creativity?

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity


Also by logical analogy i have also just said the following:


Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo

I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents, but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization, and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:

So i have invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy from here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.