On 8/19/2022 12:38 PM, David Turner wrote:
> Well, we are in the August slow down right now so asking me now is probably not
> realistic
> Many customers of mine are not going to VSI. For pricing, and the fact that they
> are going to need to do a lot more work to get their applications
> running on x86 variant of OpenVMS.
Not sure what the pricing problem is?
As in the past, I'm expecting compile, link, and run.
> Also, a lot of people we deal with have trust issues with x86 hardware.
HW is HW, none are totally safe.
> I don't know if VSI is going to support some of the older SCSI products (*not
> SAS) as I have NOT had a response from VSI to actually test 9.2 natively on one
> of our Proliant DL380 Gen10
I don't see the issue. New systems will have whatever disks are appropriate.
> Would be curious if anyone knows if any of the Virtual machines support SCSI
> adapters...
> Also, many customers use C++ and BASIC. These are not yet ported so....
>
> We are noticing that customers tend to buy a production server and spare
> together. Most are worried about availability of hardware...
Should not be an issue with x86.
> The license issue is definitely an issue too. The whole idea about an OS not
> working after a time-fixed license expires is more than unnerving to most of the
> people I have talked with.....
>
>
> DT
Compilers: I have faith in John and his lads & lasses. Might take some time.
Licenses:
Ok, here is how things will play out.
1) VSI listens to the potential customers. They should provide perpetual
licenses, and the customers will agree to maintain a reasonable support contract
as long as VSI is in business and they use VMS for commercial use.
2) VSI doesn't listen to the potential customers, and VMS and VSI die. They
might linger for a while. But it is entirely unreasonable for a customer to
be left hanging if VSI isn't around.
So, the initiative will first be with the potential customers to inform VSI what
is acceptable, and then with VSI to conform, or not.
We at Consolidated Data were very clear about the choices. We would get what we
needed, or, would not move to x86. All customers need to be firm about this.
Basically, every potential customer should inform VSI of their requirements, and
leave contact information. If VSI will conform, they will get the customers.
What should NOT happen is customers just not like what they are hearing and
quietly go away. Strongly inform VSI of the requirements.
Frankly, I don't expect VSI to commit suicide. Could be wrong. But it doesn't
make any sense. Guess we'll see when x86 is ready for prime time, and that
means native compilers.
At least that's how I see things.
--
David Froble Tel:
724-529-0450
Dave Froble Enterprises, Inc. E-Mail:
da...@tsoft-inc.com
DFE Ultralights, Inc.
170 Grimplin Road
Vanderbilt, PA 15486