On 2014-06-22 13:03:42 +0000, Hans Vlems said:
> What I assumed was that even though the EMC is not supported that it
> would talk to a VMS supported controller. The next step was to try a
> RAID set up and should that fail, use a JBOD configuration.
It isn't so much the fibre channel host bus adapter (FC HBA) that chats
with the fibre channel storage area network (FC SAN) controller (though
both technically and obviously, those two widgets do necessarily chat),
the usual wrinkle here is whether the operating system can successfully
chat with the storage controllers.
OpenVMS has specific expectations for the FC SAN controller. Usual
among those is the ability to set the UDID for the disks. VMS didn't
chat with all of the HP and Compaq FC SAN controllers available, for
instance. VMS also doesn't operate via arbitrated loop — a fibre
channel switch is expected, and with whatever zoning that brings to the
configuration established. Specific storage controller firmware could
be required. If there was no UDID support or such in the controller,
then either VMS or the controller would have to be modified. (I don't
recall off-hand if there was a bypass some of these requirements; that
allowed the UDID to be "spoofed" within VMS.)
The OpenVMS FC SAN DGDRIVER device driver sends basically-SCSI I/O
command packets to the target FC SAN controller. These packets are
effectively using the SCSI command-response protocol, but with the
hardware quite possibly operating rather further alway from the OpenVMS
host than with the typical SCSI configuration. (IIRC, DGDRIVER and the
stack is a build-time variation of the SCSI DKDRIVER device driver,
too.)
RAID and the rest are usually entirely secondary to establishing and
configuring the initial support expected by VMS.
Skim the (two) VMS cluster manuals in the VMS doc set
<
http://www.hp.com/go/openvms/doc> for an overview of the FC SAN
support, from the perspective of VMS. There have been various fibre
channel pages and documents posted at the VMS web site over the years,
as well.
Multihost SCSI will be easier and will console less power and space and
parts and cables.