Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

What to do...

41 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob Devries

unread,
Jul 14, 2011, 6:12:51 PM7/14/11
to
Nearly 20 years ago, I bought a 68000 based computer kit called the
SECAD AS-68K from a company in Melbourne, Australia. It was supplied
with OS-9/68000 Professional.

There are times when the computer just sat on the shelf, and others
when it was in constant daily use.
Recently, it would appear that the BIOS/BOOT ROM chips fried. It
doesn't boot up anymore. The disks are fine; they checked out in
another 68K based computer I have. At the time this happened, I had
been working on hardware and software to implement an 8-bit IDE hard
disk controller and driver.

The owners of the company appear to be too busy with other tasks to
service a request for new ROM chips or a binary dump so I can program
my own chips.

Is there anything I can do to get my AS-68K working again. The boot
ROM need only be able to read the universal format boot disk using a
765 floppy chip. No screen output is necessary, but output to a serial
port using the built-in 68681 based serial ports would be nice. I
believe that I have the full technical specifications on hand.

I'm not a serious programmer, and I only tinker with this and other
"obsolete" computers as a hobby to fill my spare time.

If there are other AS-68K users out there who can help, please do.

kindest regards,
Bob Devries
Dalby, QLD, Australia

JackRubin

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 6:38:24 PM7/16/11
to

This is bad news, since I was hoping to get copies of your ROMs/PALs
to go with the bare board I got from Jim Adamthwaite. Have you dumped
the other programmed chips? Hope your plea turns up some other users!!

best,
Jack

Bob Devries

unread,
Aug 11, 2011, 4:29:08 AM8/11/11
to

Jack,
I will keep pestering the author, and trying to find out for myself
some way of re-creating the BOOTROM code.
I do have another OS9/68K computer (two actually, if I count my packed
Atari STe and STf computers), so I'll try to see what is in the ROM of
those.
Regards, Bob Devries
Dalby, QLD, Australia

Lejavaman

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 5:08:08 AM8/19/11
to

We have got a few systems running on 68030 and 68040. The provider was
SBS - OR which is a German company based in Augsburg. The version of
OS9 we use is V2.9 with some modules of V2.4. I don't know if it can
be of any help if we copy the boot ROM. Let me know.

Christophe

Bob Devries

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 5:32:45 AM8/19/11
to
On Aug 19, 7:08 pm, Lejavaman <christophelimb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have got a few systems running on 68030 and 68040. The provider was
> SBS - OR which is a German company based in Augsburg. The version of
> OS9 we use is V2.9 with some modules of V2.4. I don't know if it can
> be of any help if we copy the boot ROM. Let me know.
>
> Christophe

Thanks for the offer, Christophe. However, the BOOT ROM is likely to
be highly specific to the hardware, which in this case is an XT/ISA
multi-IO card, an EGA graphics card and when I'm finished writing and
debugging it, and XT-IDE hard disk drive.

The AS-68K computer is rather special, but not unrelated to the PT-68K
(both use the ISA sockets for IO cards).
For instance, the floppy drive (via the uPC765) is addressed at
$00F003F0. There is a 68681 DUART on the mother board (useful if the
Multi-IO card won't behave).
In the future (provided I can get the AS-68K running again), I want to
write a floppy disk driver to use the WD37C65 to allow me to use
1.4MiB floppies.

Martin Gregorie

unread,
Aug 19, 2011, 3:43:10 PM8/19/11
to
On Fri, 19 Aug 2011 02:32:45 -0700, Bob Devries wrote:

> In the future (provided I can get the AS-68K running again), I want to
> write a floppy disk driver to use the WD37C65 to allow me to use 1.4MiB
> floppies.
>

As a kind of parallel suggestion, have you considered using CF cards
instead? The reason I suggest them is that IDE - CF adapters are quite
cheap (much cheaper than a floppy drive) and fairly readily available.
They are just a small PCB with an IDE socket on one side and a CF card
socket on the other, typically mounted in a metal strip that fits a PC
adapter card slot. Use a card of 2GB or less and the standard IDE RBF
driver should work with it, either with the standard IO manager of the
PCFS one.

I have one of these adapters that I intend to use as for backups and to
transfer data to a Linux system - I just haven't gotten round to
installing it yet. Currently I'm using floppies for backups, but this
device is my way out when my OSK box goes bang and I switch over to using
os9exec under Linux.


--
martin@ | Martin Gregorie
gregorie. | Essex, UK
org |

Bob Devries

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 3:01:55 AM8/20/11
to
On Aug 20, 5:43 am, Martin Gregorie <mar...@address-in-sig.invalid>
wrote:

> As a kind of parallel suggestion, have you considered using CF cards
> instead? The reason I suggest them is that IDE - CF adapters are quite
> cheap (much cheaper than a floppy drive) and fairly readily available.

Indeed, this has crossed my mind also. I have yet to study the
documentation for a CF card to see if it can be set up with a
different file system, thus removing the necessity of using the PCF
file manager. It has an added advantage of being very quiet, so if I
can find a quiet XT power supply, it would be great.

I actually have some of the source code needed to produce a bootrom,
but I'm missing the vectors.a and boot.a files. I think that with
them, I could produce a replacement ROM.

Regards, Bob Devries
Dalby, QLD, Australia

Martin Gregorie

unread,
Aug 20, 2011, 12:14:54 PM8/20/11
to
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 00:01:55 -0700, Bob Devries wrote:

> On Aug 20, 5:43 am, Martin Gregorie <mar...@address-in-sig.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> As a kind of parallel suggestion, have you considered using CF cards
>> instead? The reason I suggest them is that IDE - CF adapters are quite
>> cheap (much cheaper than a floppy drive) and fairly readily available.
>
> Indeed, this has crossed my mind also. I have yet to study the
> documentation for a CF card to see if it can be set up with a different
> file system, thus removing the necessity of using the PCF file manager.
> It has an added advantage of being very quiet, so if I can find a quiet
> XT power supply, it would be great.
>

There's a lot of good information about CF-cards here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompactFlash

In summary, it seems that all CF cards contain a wear-leveling controller
and that all have a built-in PATA mode, switched on by the level on one
of the pins. Like most flash cards the default is FAT-16 for those
smaller than 2GB and FAT-32 for bigger ones but the article also confirms
that they can be formatted with any filing system and can be partitioned.

As I said, the adapter I have is mounted in a metal strip and is designed
to be fitted into a PC adapter slot but there are also CF card adapters
that allow a CF card to be used as a drop-in replacement for a 2.5" PATA/
IDE disk.

0 new messages