Re: Why eComStation is Bad for OS/2 Community
tho...@antispam.ham
> Jason Bowen wrote:
>>>> wipe yer chin
>>> Also non sequitur.
>> No tissues on hand?
> If you can't be bothered to show some consideration for the rest of us
> that have to read this inane rubbish then at last think about your own
> reputations - any potential future employer of yours that decides to
> check you out via Google in the future will find this childish rubbish
> and make up their minds accordingly.
Which employers rely on Google to check out future employees, Hemsley?
Do they also rely on the local hairdressers for hearsay? Or to put it
another way, would you want to work for an employer that relies on
Google for evidence? Exactly how do they cull out all the forged
postings?
> This stuff is being splatted across
> 3 groups and doesn't belong in at least two of them and the third is
> debatable.
Then why did you post your response to all three of them, Hemsley?
> Take it to email please. Thanks.
I suggest you give some thought to the purpose of "antispam".
Michael Baldwin Bruce
but he doesn't like spam, bruce.