Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Workplace Shell replacement without the secret undocumented 16-bit stuff

15 views
Skip to first unread message

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard

unread,
Mar 28, 2011, 4:31:48 PM3/28/11
to
> Gnome is now a pretty good GUI, but PM/WPS are still tops.
>
On that subject, here's another "Whither". Is anyone working on a
replacement for Workplace Shell that doesn't have all of the daft
Session Manager stuff in it? That would be good to have.

Lars Erdmann

unread,
Mar 28, 2011, 5:37:17 PM3/28/11
to
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>> Gnome is now a pretty good GUI, but PM/WPS are still tops.
>>
> On that subject, here's another "Whither". Is anyone working on a replacement for Workplace Shell that doesn't have all of the daft Session Manager stuff in it? That would be good to have.
>
Yes, you. Or stop wasting bandwidth.

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard

unread,
Mar 28, 2011, 7:43:16 PM3/28/11
to

I take it from your useless post that you don't actually know the answer
to my question. I find it humourously ironic that you speak of wasting
bandwidth in a post that does nothing but. I continue to await a reply
from someone who actually does know the answer.

Trifle Menot

unread,
Mar 28, 2011, 8:50:53 PM3/28/11
to
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 00:43:16 +0100, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
<J.deBoynePoll...@NTLWorld.COM> wrote:

>> Yes, you. Or stop wasting bandwidth.

>I take it from your useless post that you don't actually know the answer
>to my question. I find it humourously ironic that you speak of wasting
>bandwidth in a post that does nothing but.

People complaining about Usenet bandwidth like they're still using a
1200 baud modem.

I upgraded to 33.6 a long time ago. It's better than 640k of memory!

:-D


--
Web mail, POP3, and SMTP
http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php

Andy

unread,
Mar 28, 2011, 9:44:36 PM3/28/11
to

This is the only project I know about for replacing WPS (though choice
of platform was not chosen the last I knew of but as far as I know
there were builds being done for OS/2 by the developers). As far as I
know the project stalled out several years ago when the focus of the
project changed and took on infinite scope.
http://voyager.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml
There is svn access but it is not open to the public so I can't see if
there has been any work done but there was a basically functional SOM
replacement from my understanding.
http://nom.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml is merely a place holder on
the site.
You'd have to ask Adrian about getting access if you are interested.
His contact info can be found at
http://www.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml

Andy
--

Peter Flass

unread,
Mar 29, 2011, 8:00:25 AM3/29/11
to
On 3/28/2011 9:44 PM, Andy wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:31:48 UTC, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
> <J.deBoynePoll...@NTLWorld.COM> wrote:
>
>>> Gnome is now a pretty good GUI, but PM/WPS are still tops.
>>>
>> On that subject, here's another "Whither". Is anyone working on a
>> replacement for Workplace Shell that doesn't have all of the daft
>> Session Manager stuff in it? That would be good to have.
>>
> This is the only project I know about for replacing WPS (though choice
> of platform was not chosen the last I knew of but as far as I know
> there were builds being done for OS/2 by the developers). As far as I
> know the project stalled out several years ago when the focus of the
> project changed and took on infinite scope.
> http://voyager.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml

The quickest way I know to ensure nothing gets accomplished.

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard

unread,
Mar 29, 2011, 1:29:23 PM3/29/11
to
> This is the only project I know about for replacing WPS (though choice
> of platform was not chosen the last I knew of but as far as I know
> there were builds being done for OS/2 by the developers). As far as I
> know the project stalled out several years ago when the focus of the
> project changed and took on infinite scope.
>

That's one of the problems that one encounters. (-: Thank you. I'll
have a look.

> There is svn access but it is not open to the public so I can't see if
> there has been any work done but there was a basically functional SOM
> replacement from my understanding.
>

That's NOM. I've read about that. By all reports it isn't binary
compatible. That's not very useful for what I want.

Jonathan de Boyne Pollard

unread,
Mar 29, 2011, 1:33:01 PM3/29/11
to
>> As far as I know the project stalled out several years ago when the
>> focus of the project changed and took on infinite scope.
>>
> The quickest way I know to ensure nothing gets accomplished.
>

Closely followed by setting up a public bug tracking database? (-:

0 new messages