I take it from your useless post that you don't actually know the answer
to my question. I find it humourously ironic that you speak of wasting
bandwidth in a post that does nothing but. I continue to await a reply
from someone who actually does know the answer.
>> Yes, you. Or stop wasting bandwidth.
>I take it from your useless post that you don't actually know the answer
>to my question. I find it humourously ironic that you speak of wasting
>bandwidth in a post that does nothing but.
People complaining about Usenet bandwidth like they're still using a
1200 baud modem.
I upgraded to 33.6 a long time ago. It's better than 640k of memory!
:-D
--
Web mail, POP3, and SMTP
http://www.beewyz.com/freeaccounts.php
This is the only project I know about for replacing WPS (though choice
of platform was not chosen the last I knew of but as far as I know
there were builds being done for OS/2 by the developers). As far as I
know the project stalled out several years ago when the focus of the
project changed and took on infinite scope.
http://voyager.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml
There is svn access but it is not open to the public so I can't see if
there has been any work done but there was a basically functional SOM
replacement from my understanding.
http://nom.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml is merely a place holder on
the site.
You'd have to ask Adrian about getting access if you are interested.
His contact info can be found at
http://www.netlabs.org/en/site/index.xml
Andy
--
The quickest way I know to ensure nothing gets accomplished.
That's one of the problems that one encounters. (-: Thank you. I'll
have a look.
> There is svn access but it is not open to the public so I can't see if
> there has been any work done but there was a basically functional SOM
> replacement from my understanding.
>
That's NOM. I've read about that. By all reports it isn't binary
compatible. That's not very useful for what I want.
Closely followed by setting up a public bug tracking database? (-: