digest digest, volumes 2454489-2454683

Warren G. Harding

unread,

Aug 4, 2008, 8:54:43 PM8/4/08

to

The following summarizes the "newsgroup disruption minimization"
performed by David Tholen during the previous reporting period.
These "digests" are posted separately to three newsgroups,
comp.os.os2.advocacy, rec.sport.basketball.college, and
rec.music.classical. Tholen has stated that the actions of other
people force him to spam these newsgroups with these off-topic
"digests," which are largely identical.

Note 1 -- the digests posted to rec.music.classical contain an
appendix consisting of a list of the last names of posters for whom
he counts posts. The digests posted to the other newsgroups lack
this numeric accounting scheme.

Note 2 -- on April 7, 2008, Tholen deemed it necessary to begin
spreading the "digests" into a third newsgroup,
rec.sport.basketball.college.

Note 3 -- the gap in the digests between June 9, 2008 and July 2,
2008 was the result of Tholen's ISP, Roadrunner, dropping all Usenet
access. Tholen selected Google's "Groups" Usenet web interface as
his new NSP. At this point the "From:" headers of the digests
changed from 'tho...@antispam.ham' to '"tho...@antispam.ham"
<tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>'. This change can be seen in the text of the
Message-IDs.

Note 4 -- the numbers attached to the "volume" tag in the "digest"
subjects are merely the Julian date for the day on which that
particular "digest" was posted. See the following link for more
information:

<http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/JulianDate.html>

-----------------------

rec.music.classical:

subject date lines kbytes
msg id
Re: digest, volume 2454489 03:43 PM 1/23/2008 635 1.78
<4797c323$0$1450$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454490 03:44 PM 1/24/2008 780 1.75
<479914cf$0$22582$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454491 12:07 PM 1/25/2008 2130 106
<479a335e$0$7199$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454492 03:19 PM 1/26/2008 613 1.86
<479bb1e4$0$6145$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454493 04:37 PM 1/27/2008 760 37
<479d15cf$0$4931$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454494 09:37 AM 1/28/2008 715 35.7
<479e04ae$0$22584$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454506 12:08 PM 2/9/2008 2620 1.79
<47adfa12$0$16675$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454507 02:27 PM 2/10/2008 1250 1.77
<47af6c36$0$6116$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454508 12:32 PM 2/11/2008 1100 1.76
<47b0a2e6$0$16647$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454509 01:27 PM 2/12/2008 980 42.2
<47b2012e$0$1107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454510 01:59 PM 2/13/2008 856 1.77
<47b35a2f$0$6519$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454511 03:53 PM 2/14/2008 875 1.75
<47b4c676$0$6484$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454512 11:42 AM 2/15/2008 807 1.74
<47b5dd0f$0$6495$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454514 11:18 AM 2/17/2008 1060 1.77
<47b87a76$0$1085$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454515 01:45 PM 2/18/2008 1540 1.76
<47b9ee4b$0$8637$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454516 03:14 PM 2/19/2008 1190 1.75
<47bb54b6$0$6495$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454518 04:02 PM 2/21/2008 1060 45
<47be030c$0$6477$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454519 02:38 PM 2/22/2008 239 1.78
<47bf40cf$0$6117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454520 01:29 PM 2/23/2008 985 1.76
<47c08246$0$6475$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454521 01:56 PM 2/24/2008 768 1.76
<47c1d9ec$0$16656$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454522 01:33 PM 2/25/2008 1020 43.1
<47c3262b$0$4934$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454523 11:34 AM 2/26/2008 995 43.2
<47c45bae$0$4957$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454525 03:37 PM 2/28/2008 936 1.76
<47c737c6$0$7007$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454526 01:28 PM 2/29/2008 700 1.79
<47c86ae2$0$22865$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454527 03:25 PM 3/1/2008 1010 43.5
<47c9d7c5$0$1117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454528 02:31 PM 3/2/2008 806 1.76
<47cb1cab$0$4946$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454529 12:37 PM 3/3/2008 990 1.72
<47cc537d$0$30679$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454530 01:48 PM 3/4/2008 906 1.76
<47cdb59e$0$6512$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454531 12:11 PM 3/5/2008 807 38.4
<47cef051$0$6119$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454532 02:30 PM 3/6/2008 785 1.74
<47d0627c$0$6996$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454533 03:27 PM 3/7/2008 781 38.8
<47d1c145$0$16666$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454534 03:06 PM 3/8/2008 795 1.76
<47d2ffe0$0$6501$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454535 03:02 PM 3/9/2008 936 1.77
<47d45054$0$6123$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454536 01:40 PM 3/10/2008 532 31.4
<47d58e92$0$1094$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454537 04:05 PM 3/11/2008 639 34.3
<47d7022e$0$30538$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454538 02:06 PM 3/12/2008 588 1.77
<47d837cb$0$6153$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454539 03:57 PM 3/13/2008 325 22.7
<47d9a360$0$6473$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454541 12:47 PM 3/15/2008 670 35.7
<47dc19d3$0$22840$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454542 01:05 PM 3/16/2008 599 1.76
<47dd6f8c$0$6145$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454543 03:06 PM 3/17/2008 573 32.6
<47dedd3c$0$6130$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454544 03:57 PM 3/18/2008 591 1.76
<47e03ad9$0$17344$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454546 05:43 PM 3/20/2008 659 1.76
<47e2f68d$0$22876$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454547 05:09 PM 3/21/2008 650 35
<47e44039$0$16668$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454549 02:49 PM 3/23/2008 830 41.7
<47e6c23c$0$30673$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454550 02:12 PM 3/24/2008 809 40.9
<47e80b2f$0$24119$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454551 02:05 PM 3/25/2008 553 1.77
<47e95b19$0$4969$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454552 04:40 PM 3/26/2008 237 20
<47ead0c5$0$4968$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454555 02:39 PM 3/29/2008 571 1.81
<47eea8ea$0$17349$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454556 12:03 PM 3/30/2008 557 32.7
<47efd602$0$22823$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454557 01:20 PM 3/31/2008 610 34.1
<47f13967$0$16646$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454558 04:50 PM 4/1/2008 1000 1.77
<47f2bc42$0$1090$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454559 05:25 PM 4/2/2008 613 1.77
<47f415ff$0$1117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454560 03:47 PM 4/3/2008 888 1.77
<47f55065$0$11360$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454562 03:55 PM 4/5/2008 1010 46.2
<47f7f53a$0$12569$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454563 03:15 PM 4/6/2008 723 35.9
<47f93d82$0$6508$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454564 03:44 PM 4/7/2008 766 1.79
<47fa95d0$0$30679$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454570 03:48 AM 4/13/2008 2220 1.81
<4801d6e0$0$3387$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454571 06:03 PM 4/14/2008 728 1.77
<4803f0c1$0$22215$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454572 01:50 PM 4/15/2008 320 22.7
<4805070f$0$22252$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454573 06:05 PM 4/16/2008 1050 48
<48069436$0$4111$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454574 05:51 PM 4/17/2008 990 45.6
<4807e278$0$12939$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454575 06:30 PM 4/18/2008 1430 1.77
<48093d42$0$12907$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454576 04:05 PM 4/19/2008 771 38
<480a6cab$0$7721$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454577 06:28 PM 4/20/2008 980 46.3
<480bdfb4$0$30180$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454578 08:01 PM 4/21/2008 990 1.77
<480d470c$0$30188$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454579 05:52 PM 4/22/2008 757 38.2
<480e7a31$0$12912$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454580 06:49 PM 4/23/2008 1100 51.7
<480fd902$0$31726$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454581 02:45 PM 4/24/2008 745 1.79
<4810f15c$0$5107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454582 05:01 PM 4/25/2008 293 1.77
<481262ad$0$7715$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454584 02:33 PM 4/27/2008 875 43.5
<4814e31c$0$31764$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454585 02:48 PM 4/28/2008 576 33.3
<4816380a$0$7079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454586 04:46 PM 4/29/2008 990 1.77
<4817a52e$0$31745$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454588 04:59 PM 5/1/2008 748 38.2
<481a4b3a$0$12949$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454589 04:48 PM 5/2/2008 658 36.5
<481b9a52$0$5100$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454590 02:22 PM 5/3/2008 863 41.5
<481cc97c$0$7051$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454591 03:36 PM 5/4/2008 1010 1.77
<481e2c4f$0$30227$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454592 02:19 PM 5/5/2008 727 37.4
<481f6bb4$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454593 05:12 PM 5/6/2008 733 1.76
<4820e5e6$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454594 03:38 PM 5/7/2008 396 26.7
<4822213a$0$30159$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454595 02:44 PM 5/8/2008 754 39.4
<48236633$0$30239$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454596 02:04 PM 5/9/2008 367 25.1
<4824ae36$0$30501$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454597 11:59 AM 5/10/2008 315 1.81
<4825e277$0$20203$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454598 04:25 PM 5/11/2008 668 37.2
<4827724b$0$20158$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454599 02:35 PM 5/12/2008 719 26.2
<4828a9ff$0$3374$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454600 04:37 PM 5/13/2008 590 1.82
<482a1834$0$12895$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454602 02:57 PM 5/15/2008 340 1.74
<482ca3d1$0$30523$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454603 03:18 PM 5/16/2008 130 1.74
<482dfa2c$0$30500$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454603 03:19 PM 5/16/2008 333 24
<482dfa44$0$30500$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454604 01:59 PM 5/17/2008 8 1.83
<482f392a$0$7716$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454605 02:09 PM 5/18/2008 12 1.94
<48308d03$0$4063$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454606 02:22 PM 5/19/2008 802 1.89
<4831e171$0$4106$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454607 04:15 PM 5/20/2008 371 25.4
<48334d6a$0$12900$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454608 04:51 PM 5/21/2008 416 1.82
<4834a78a$0$20185$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454609 12:16 AM 5/23/2008 874 62.9
<48366122$0$12964$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454610 04:03 PM 5/23/2008 346 23.5
<48373f16$0$30507$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454612 03:56 PM 5/25/2008 742 38.5
<4839e0a4$0$31734$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454613 03:18 PM 5/26/2008 961 1.81
<483b290b$0$7725$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454614 11:51 AM 5/27/2008 574 1.82
<483c4a11$0$12971$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454616 11:17 PM 5/29/2008 311 23.4
<483f8dd9$0$30171$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454617 02:51 PM 5/30/2008 302 23.2
<484068b9$0$7060$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454619 03:20 PM 6/1/2008 779 1.81
<484312af$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454618 03:25 PM 6/1/2008 946 1.81
<484313d0$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454620 01:23 PM 6/2/2008 754 39.7
<484448a5$0$4067$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454621 01:27 PM 6/3/2008 549 33.2
<48459b09$0$5710$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454622 02:41 PM 6/4/2008 371 1.81
<4846fe0b$0$5121$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454623 02:22 PM 6/5/2008 347 24.7
<48484aec$0$4079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454627 01:08 PM 6/9/2008 766 40.4
<484d7fa1$0$5693$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454650 02:59 PM 7/2/2008 830 24.4
<291d4205-ccc8-4caa...@w5g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454651 12:44 PM 7/3/2008 838 2.06
<c38c8bce-2b2e-4930...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454652 01:30 PM 7/4/2008 110 4.57
<60e03502-f3a1-4235...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454652 01:48 PM 7/4/2008 1960 45.2
<9fd23ce0-356f-4196...@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454653 01:47 PM 7/5/2008 2490 1.77
<de75b51f-0bab-40d4...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454654 02:21 PM 7/6/2008 1640 30.9
<7ef676e5-c4cc-47a3...@d45g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454655 01:03 PM 7/7/2008 932 27
<765ed02a-eb95-48af...@27g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454656 04:15 PM 7/8/2008 1690 31.9
<c3ebd421-0d70-41a7...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454657 01:19 PM 7/9/2008 872 2.06
<734b0bc5-54a7-40e8...@c58g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454676 11:39 AM 7/28/2008 916 26.3
<e6979d3e-00bf-4e49...@t1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454677 02:56 PM 7/29/2008 1210 1.79
<4189d6f3-02c6-454c...@h17g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454678 02:26 PM 7/30/2008 763 1.79
<5cfd36f3-9491-4e0d...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454679 01:28 PM 7/31/2008 875 1.77
<3b170241-7900-4296...@b30g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454680 01:30 PM 8/1/2008 1200 1.79
<5ad3d89c-847b-4ae1...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454682 03:11 PM 8/3/2008 1500 1.93
<08689409-8208-4a1c...@a21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454681 04:46 PM 8/2/2008 766 1.73
<e65314ab-27d2-4e5b...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454683 12:03 PM 8/4/2008 624 1.72
<3eb10ef4-c968-44c8...@b30g2000prf.googlegroups.com>

Total: 101036 lines, 2257.15 kbytes

-----------------------

comp.os.os2.advocacy:

subject date lines kbytes
msg id
Re: digest, volume 2454489 03:43 PM 1/23/2008 428 15.9
<4797c30b$0$1450$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454490 03:44 PM 1/24/2008 649 29.6
<479914b7$0$22582$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454491 12:06 PM 1/25/2008 2020 1.8
<479a331d$0$7199$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454492 03:18 PM 1/26/2008 438 16.6
<479bb1b5$0$6145$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454493 04:37 PM 1/27/2008 581 21
<479d15b3$0$4931$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454494 09:36 AM 1/28/2008 484 1.38
<479e0499$0$22584$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454506 12:05 PM 2/9/2008 100 3.62
<47adf995$0$16675$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454506 12:07 PM 2/9/2008 2430 1.79
<47adf9e5$0$16675$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454507 02:26 PM 2/10/2008 1130 1.77
<47af6c20$0$6116$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454508 12:32 PM 2/11/2008 1090 1.76
<47b0a2d1$0$16647$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454509 01:27 PM 2/12/2008 870 27.5
<47b2011a$0$1107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454510 01:58 PM 2/13/2008 718 1.9
<47b35a0c$0$6519$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454511 03:53 PM 2/14/2008 650 1.75
<47b4c65a$0$6484$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454512 11:42 AM 2/15/2008 746 1.74
<47b5dcfb$0$6495$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454513 10:36 AM 2/16/2008 622 32.4
<47b71f29$0$6496$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454514 11:18 AM 2/17/2008 1220 39.7
<47b87a60$0$1085$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454515 01:45 PM 2/18/2008 1600 48.9
<47b9ee7b$0$8637$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454516 12:59 PM 2/19/2008 171 1.88
<47bb3526$0$22858$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454516 03:13 PM 2/19/2008 1180 35
<47bb549c$0$6495$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454517 01:27 PM 2/20/2008 10 1.71
<47bc8d29$0$30713$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454518 04:02 PM 2/21/2008 913 1.82
<47be02f8$0$6477$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454519 11:50 AM 2/22/2008 8 1.77
<47bf1960$0$24090$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454520 01:29 PM 2/23/2008 864 30.1
<47c0822f$0$6475$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454521 01:55 PM 2/24/2008 351 1.78
<47c1d9d5$0$16656$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454522 01:37 PM 2/25/2008 105 5.24
<47c32716$0$4934$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454522 01:33 PM 2/25/2008 932 29.6
<47c3260b$0$4934$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454523 11:34 AM 2/26/2008 780 25.6
<47c45b9f$0$4957$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454524 03:23 PM 2/27/2008 157 1.76
<47c5e2ea$0$17352$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454525 03:37 PM 2/28/2008 788 1.76
<47c737ad$0$7007$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454526 01:28 PM 2/29/2008 516 18.9
<47c86ad0$0$22865$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454526 01:31 PM 2/29/2008 139 1.92
<47c86ba4$0$22865$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454527 03:24 PM 3/1/2008 857 1.74
<47c9d7af$0$1117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454528 02:31 PM 3/2/2008 739 25.6
<47cb1c97$0$4946$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454529 12:37 PM 3/3/2008 897 28.5
<47cc5368$0$30679$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454530 01:48 PM 3/4/2008 762 1.77
<47cdb582$0$6512$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454531 11:58 AM 3/5/2008 211 1.94
<47ceed4e$0$6119$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454531 12:10 PM 3/5/2008 639 1.77
<47cef031$0$6119$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454532 02:30 PM 3/6/2008 599 1.77
<47d0626a$0$6996$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454532 02:37 PM 3/6/2008 212 1.83
<47d06425$0$6996$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454533 03:26 PM 3/7/2008 612 22.5
<47d1c131$0$16666$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454534 03:06 PM 3/8/2008 630 1.77
<47d2ffc9$0$6501$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454535 03:01 PM 3/9/2008 734 24.8
<47d45040$0$6123$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454536 01:39 PM 3/10/2008 693 24.1
<47d58e78$0$1094$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454537 04:05 PM 3/11/2008 811 27.3
<47d70215$0$30538$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454538 02:06 PM 3/12/2008 719 23.5
<47d837b1$0$6153$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454539 04:00 PM 3/13/2008 154 6.55
<47d9a3f9$0$6473$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454539 03:57 PM 3/13/2008 167 1.7
<47d9a345$0$6473$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454541 12:47 PM 3/15/2008 898 29.1
<47dc19b8$0$22840$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454542 01:05 PM 3/16/2008 869 1.76
<47dd6f76$0$6145$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454543 03:05 PM 3/17/2008 762 26.3
<47dedd19$0$6130$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454544 03:57 PM 3/18/2008 480 1.75
<47e03abf$0$17344$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454545 02:16 PM 3/19/2008 78 3.97
<47e174aa$0$30691$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454546 05:42 PM 3/20/2008 742 1.69
<47e2f67c$0$22876$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454547 05:09 PM 3/21/2008 702 25.7
<47e44024$0$16668$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454549 02:48 PM 3/23/2008 830 31.3
<47e6c217$0$30673$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454549 02:51 PM 3/23/2008 101 4.49
<47e6c2ea$0$30673$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454550 02:12 PM 3/24/2008 804 29.5
<47e80b11$0$24119$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454551 02:05 PM 3/25/2008 412 1.69
<47e95afe$0$4969$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Elizabot digest, volume 2454551 01:53 PM 3/25/2008 8 1.72
<47e9581e$0$4969$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454552 04:39 PM 3/26/2008 61 3.32
<47ead0b3$0$4968$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454555 02:37 PM 3/29/2008 139 5.99
<47eea89b$0$17349$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454555 02:38 PM 3/29/2008 445 1.82
<47eea8d7$0$17349$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454556 12:03 PM 3/30/2008 349 15.3
<47efd5f1$0$22823$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454557 01:19 PM 3/31/2008 416 17
<47f13957$0$16646$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454558 04:53 PM 4/1/2008 159 6.56
<47f2bcea$0$1090$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454558 04:50 PM 4/1/2008 813 27.6
<47f2bc27$0$1090$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454559 05:31 PM 4/2/2008 180 1.74
<47f4174e$0$1117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454559 05:25 PM 4/2/2008 432 17.4
<47f415de$0$1117$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454560 03:46 PM 4/3/2008 917 1.77
<47f55049$0$11360$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454562 03:54 PM 4/5/2008 1010 1.77
<47f7f528$0$12569$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454563 03:15 PM 4/6/2008 647 22.9
<47f93d65$0$6508$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454564 03:44 PM 4/7/2008 621 22.1
<47fa95b5$0$30679$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454570 04:28 AM 4/13/2008 313 10.5
<4801e061$0$3386$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454570 03:47 AM 4/13/2008 2130 74.3
<4801d6bb$0$3387$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454571 06:02 PM 4/14/2008 504 19.7
<4803f0ac$0$22215$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454571 06:04 PM 4/14/2008 190 6.73
<4803f125$0$22215$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454572 01:50 PM 4/15/2008 160 7
<480506f8$0$22252$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454572 01:55 PM 4/15/2008 117 4.45
<48050841$0$22252$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454573 06:06 PM 4/16/2008 911 32.8
<48069486$0$4111$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454574 05:49 PM 4/17/2008 766 26.3
<4807e208$0$12939$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454575 06:30 PM 4/18/2008 1130 40.4
<48093d1c$0$12907$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454576 04:05 PM 4/19/2008 502 19.5
<480a6c90$0$7721$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454577 06:28 PM 4/20/2008 861 29.8
<480bdf9c$0$30180$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454578 08:01 PM 4/21/2008 760 26.9
<480d46f5$0$30188$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454579 05:51 PM 4/22/2008 674 25.9
<480e7a19$0$12912$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454580 06:48 PM 4/23/2008 867 1.77
<480fd8df$0$31726$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454580 06:50 PM 4/23/2008 798 29.3
<480fd937$0$31726$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454581 02:43 PM 4/24/2008 482 1.77
<4810f0e9$0$5107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454581 02:47 PM 4/24/2008 185 7.38
<4810f1de$0$5107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454582 05:00 PM 4/25/2008 58 3.24
<48126284$0$7715$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454583 02:34 PM 4/26/2008 175 2.04
<481391e5$0$5697$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454584 02:32 PM 4/27/2008 741 28.5
<4814e2f9$0$31764$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454584 02:43 PM 4/27/2008 355 1.9
<4814e57a$0$31764$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454585 02:51 PM 4/28/2008 165 6.84
<481638ef$0$7079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454585 02:47 PM 4/28/2008 442 1.77
<481637f6$0$7079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454586 04:45 PM 4/29/2008 663 1.77
<4817a519$0$31745$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454588 04:58 PM 5/1/2008 527 20.2
<481a4b28$0$12949$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454589 04:48 PM 5/2/2008 492 19.2
<481b9a3f$0$5100$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454590 02:22 PM 5/3/2008 620 22.7
<481cc968$0$7051$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454591 03:35 PM 5/4/2008 805 27.8
<481e2c16$0$30227$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454592 02:18 PM 5/5/2008 490 1.77
<481f6ba4$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454593 05:15 PM 5/6/2008 97 4.38
<4820e6ac$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454593 05:12 PM 5/6/2008 61 1.72
<4820e5c4$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454594 03:42 PM 5/7/2008 182 7.22
<48222235$0$30159$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454594 03:36 PM 5/7/2008 74 1.76
<482220dc$0$30159$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454595 02:44 PM 5/8/2008 561 21.5
<4823661d$0$30239$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454596 02:03 PM 5/9/2008 158 7.37
<4824ae1b$0$30501$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454597 11:59 AM 5/10/2008 111 5.24
<4825e264$0$20203$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454598 04:23 PM 5/11/2008 944 36.1
<482771e8$0$20158$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454599 02:33 PM 5/12/2008 719 25.9
<4828a9a5$0$3374$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454600 04:37 PM 5/13/2008 244 10.5
<482a1817$0$12895$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454602 02:57 PM 5/15/2008 123 1.83
<482ca3b7$0$30523$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454606 02:21 PM 5/19/2008 567 21.9
<4831e136$0$4106$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454607 04:14 PM 5/20/2008 142 6.52
<48334d3a$0$12900$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454610 04:02 PM 5/23/2008 8 1.78
<48373f05$0$30507$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454612 03:56 PM 5/25/2008 510 19.3
<4839e07e$0$31734$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454613 03:17 PM 5/26/2008 740 1.74
<483b28fa$0$7725$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454614 11:50 AM 5/27/2008 344 1.74
<483c49fd$0$12971$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454616 11:20 PM 5/29/2008 155 1.74
<483f8e84$0$30171$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454616 11:16 PM 5/29/2008 196 1.77
<483f8dc7$0$30171$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454617 02:50 PM 5/30/2008 58 3.62
<484068aa$0$7060$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454619 03:20 PM 6/1/2008 576 22.1
<48431292$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454618 03:24 PM 6/1/2008 702 1.76
<48431399$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454620 01:22 PM 6/2/2008 522 20.5
<4844488f$0$4067$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454621 01:26 PM 6/3/2008 349 15.2
<48459aea$0$5710$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454622 02:41 PM 6/4/2008 197 8.86
<4846fdf2$0$5121$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454623 02:21 PM 6/5/2008 216 10.3
<48484ad2$0$4079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454624 12:30 PM 6/6/2008 286 1.82
<48498232$0$5724$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454627 01:07 PM 6/9/2008 593 1.81
<484d7f80$0$5693$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454650 02:59 PM 7/2/2008 830 24.4
<696a497b-6005-434e...@u6g2000prc.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454651 12:43 PM 7/3/2008 838 24.1
<2e5082fd-2d4f-4cec...@t12g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454652 01:30 PM 7/4/2008 110 4.57
<60e03502-f3a1-4235...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454652 01:47 PM 7/4/2008 1960 45.2
<da0f3930-4d26-44c4...@h1g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454653 01:48 PM 7/5/2008 2490 1.79
<faa69c66-fabf-4a96...@e53g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454654 02:20 PM 7/6/2008 1640 30.9
<a1997cf8-9b9c-4213...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454655 01:30 PM 7/7/2008 168 1.84
<bd0567f6-7284-452f...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454655 01:02 PM 7/7/2008 932 27
<d5314ce0-fe2a-4907...@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454656 04:22 PM 7/8/2008 178 6.97
<9a8b64e3-6805-4912...@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454656 04:14 PM 7/8/2008 1690 31.9
<5b6df0f1-2119-4819...@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454657 01:19 PM 7/9/2008 872 25.8
<d75efb65-7952-44b0...@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Re: Elizabot digest, volume 2454670 02:23 PM 7/22/2008 8 2.19
<369a3eac-976c-4391...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454676 02:08 AM 7/28/2008 317 11.2
<69a4c49a-0ff4-4ff9...@a6g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454676 11:40 AM 7/28/2008 873 25
<17264d0a-b1cc-4a77...@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454677 02:57 PM 7/29/2008 1200 33.8
<c0b6bb1f-61ab-4a83...@v8g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454678 02:26 PM 7/30/2008 729 1.72
<8225847c-1469-4a11...@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454679 01:29 PM 7/31/2008 856 24.5
<437cdf1e-8de8-4c12...@b30g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454678 01:19 PM 7/31/2008 169 6.74
<1108f34f-2bf0-45bf...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454680 01:29 PM 8/1/2008 1180 1.79
<061336c0-c3f4-471c...@k36g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454682 10:12 PM 8/3/2008 171 6.76
<878409e8-2e5d-4966...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454682 03:11 PM 8/3/2008 1480 44.8
<8644d734-dc90-41eb...@i24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454681 04:46 PM 8/2/2008 743 23.3
<65dd2e90-95ca-476b...@v13g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454683 12:03 PM 8/4/2008 596 1.72
<6d310b66-d28c-418e...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>

Total: 91349 lines, 2085.53 kbytes

-----------------------

rec.sport.basketball.college

subject date lines kbytes
msg id
Re: digest, volume 2454564 03:45 PM 4/7/2008 643 22.9
<47fa960d$0$30679$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454570 04:28 AM 4/13/2008 313 10.5
<4801e061$0$3386$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454570 03:50 AM 4/13/2008 2540 1.83
<4801d77d$0$3387$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454571 06:04 PM 4/14/2008 681 24.2
<4803f102$0$22215$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454571 06:04 PM 4/14/2008 190 6.73
<4803f125$0$22215$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454572 01:51 PM 4/15/2008 111 5.16
<48050750$0$22252$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454573 06:06 PM 4/16/2008 911 32.8
<48069486$0$4111$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454574 05:50 PM 4/17/2008 817 28.5
<4807e25c$0$12939$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454575 06:33 PM 4/18/2008 1270 44.9
<48093dc7$0$12907$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454576 04:06 PM 4/19/2008 517 1.78
<480a6ce7$0$7721$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454577 06:30 PM 4/20/2008 830 1.78
<480be019$0$30180$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454578 08:02 PM 4/21/2008 865 30.1
<480d4743$0$30188$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454579 05:53 PM 4/22/2008 608 23.9
<480e7a86$0$12912$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454581 02:47 PM 4/24/2008 185 7.38
<4810f1de$0$5107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454581 02:44 PM 4/24/2008 500 20.5
<4810f135$0$5107$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454582 04:59 PM 4/25/2008 54 3.21
<48126256$0$7715$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454584 02:35 PM 4/27/2008 709 1.78
<4814e38b$0$31764$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454585 02:49 PM 4/28/2008 458 1.78
<48163856$0$7079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454586 04:48 PM 4/29/2008 809 1.78
<4817a5a8$0$31745$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454588 04:59 PM 5/1/2008 540 1.79
<481a4b67$0$12949$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454589 04:49 PM 5/2/2008 492 1.78
<481b9a8a$0$5100$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454590 02:23 PM 5/3/2008 619 22.6
<481cc9ad$0$7051$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454591 03:35 PM 5/4/2008 779 1.76
<481e2c39$0$30227$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454592 02:19 PM 5/5/2008 437 17
<481f6bd5$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454593 05:13 PM 5/6/2008 61 3.75
<4820e61b$0$5735$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454594 03:37 PM 5/7/2008 85 4.44
<48222125$0$30159$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454595 02:45 PM 5/8/2008 516 20.5
<48236678$0$30239$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454596 02:05 PM 5/9/2008 143 1.83
<4824ae75$0$30501$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454597 11:59 AM 5/10/2008 76 4.22
<4825e299$0$20203$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454598 04:26 PM 5/11/2008 428 1.83
<48277296$0$20158$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454599 02:34 PM 5/12/2008 921 43.6
<4828a9b9$0$3374$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454600 04:39 PM 5/13/2008 172 1.83
<482a18a5$0$12895$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454602 02:59 PM 5/15/2008 123 1.85
<482ca420$0$30523$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454603 03:19 PM 5/16/2008 105 5.3
<482dfa72$0$30500$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454604 02:00 PM 5/17/2008 8 1.86
<482f3963$0$7716$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454605 02:10 PM 5/18/2008 12 1.97
<48308d1c$0$4063$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454606 02:23 PM 5/19/2008 565 1.82
<4831e1c3$0$4106$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454607 04:16 PM 5/20/2008 143 6.61
<48334da1$0$12900$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454608 04:52 PM 5/21/2008 173 5.87
<4834a7aa$0$20185$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454609 12:16 AM 5/23/2008 631 43.7
<48366146$0$12964$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454610 04:03 PM 5/23/2008 103 4
<48373f33$0$30507$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454612 03:59 PM 5/25/2008 499 1.83
<4839e133$0$31734$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454613 03:19 PM 5/26/2008 717 1.83
<483b2943$0$7725$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454614 11:51 AM 5/27/2008 330 1.83
<483c4a28$0$12971$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454616 11:17 PM 5/29/2008 101 4.75
<483f8dfe$0$30171$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454617 02:51 PM 5/30/2008 58 3.64
<484068d7$0$7060$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454619 03:21 PM 6/1/2008 535 20.8
<484312c7$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454618 03:25 PM 6/1/2008 702 20.2
<484313ad$0$3376$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454620 01:23 PM 6/2/2008 509 1.83
<484448ce$0$4067$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454621 01:27 PM 6/3/2008 401 16.8
<48459b39$0$5710$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454622 02:42 PM 6/4/2008 197 1.88
<4846fe45$0$5121$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454623 02:22 PM 6/5/2008 196 9.71
<48484b19$0$4079$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454624 12:31 PM 6/6/2008 169 9.58
<4849826b$0$5724$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454627 01:09 PM 6/9/2008 548 22.1
<484d7fe8$0$5693$4c36...@roadrunner.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454650 03:00 PM 7/2/2008 830 24.4
<83306a62-e32d-493a...@r37g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454651 12:44 PM 7/3/2008 838 2.08
<698cc9ee-9627-437b...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: Malloy digest, volume 2454652 01:30 PM 7/4/2008 110 4.57
<60e03502-f3a1-4235...@w8g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454652 01:46 PM 7/4/2008 1960 45.2
<02b49450-823f-4fed...@y22g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454653 01:47 PM 7/5/2008 2490 35.9
<72c8ce6b-eed9-4795...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454654 02:21 PM 7/6/2008 1640 30.9
<b84a725c-8154-49e7...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454655 01:08 PM 7/7/2008 932 27
<e2a8153d-3573-4452...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454656 04:15 PM 7/8/2008 1690 31.9
<be529c60-b81d-4d06...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454653 01:47 PM 7/5/2008 2490 36
<72c8ce6b-eed9-4795...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454657 01:20 PM 7/9/2008 872 25.7
<de47a99b-3c53-4c8b...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454676 11:38 AM 7/28/2008 916 26.3
<985bcded-99ba-4b44...@j1g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454677 02:56 PM 7/29/2008 1200 1.8
<caa0fae9-83cb-4c9a...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454678 02:25 PM 7/30/2008 729 21.1
<532d8f51-7554-44b1...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454679 01:27 PM 7/31/2008 856 24.5
<fa7fb1a1-2cea-4856...@r35g2000prm.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454680 01:29 PM 8/1/2008 1180 1.79
<022ecbe6-f0a2-4e99...@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454682 03:10 PM 8/3/2008 1480 44.9
<5d52fd02-c23f-4257...@z11g2000prl.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454681 04:46 PM 8/2/2008 743 23.4
<3b3f66ca-18b4-4439...@a21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Re: digest, volume 2454683 12:02 PM 8/4/2008 597 17.7
<e5feacc1-e28a-4d7f...@r15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>

Total: 46658 lines, 1013.34 kbytes

-----------------------

Grand Total: 239043 lines, 5356.02 kbytes

--
Presidential Pests, Inc.

jmalloy

unread,

Aug 5, 2008, 7:20:14 PM8/5/08

to

Warren G. Harding wrote:

> Grand Total [of Tholen's lame digestification to "reduce clutter" in the many newsgroups he unfortunately frequents]:

> 239043 lines, 5356.02 kbytes

There you have it, 5,356 kbytes -- 5.4 megabytes! -- of Tholen's
claptrap. Tholen _sure_ reduces clutter in newsgroups. And I'm a
multimillionaire!

--
Note: I don't just criticize Tholen, I cite independent truth! None of
the websites listed below have anything of mine or have been influenced
by me. For anyone interested, here are a few sites that begin to
explain Tholen's Not-so-Grand Delusion that he knows what he is talking
about:

+ Analysis of Tholen's demented and deranged mind:
* http://www.jeffpolston.com/tholen.htm

+ You too can sound like Tholen in a box:
* http://www.mdpub.com/tholen/tholenizer.html

+ Tholen's Numerous Kook Awards:
* http://www.caballista.org/auk/kookle.php?search=Tholen

+ Summary of Kookology re: Tholen:
* http://www.lowgenius.net/kookway.htm

+ Proof that Tholen's an antagonist of the morally bankrupt sort:
* Search Google for a disparaging use of the word "queer" in:

Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
From: tho...@hale.ifa.hawaii.edu (Dave Tholen)
Date: 1998/02/18
Subject: Re: Jason S. digest, volume 2450862

[N.B.: Tholen won't include the URLs above when he pretends to respond
to me because he's too embarrassed by them.]

Art Deco

unread,

Aug 5, 2008, 8:28:32 PM8/5/08

to

jmalloy <j_t_m...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Warren G. Harding wrote:
>
>> Grand Total [of Tholen's lame digestification to "reduce clutter" in the
>> many newsgroups he unfortunately frequents]:
>
>> 239043 lines, 5356.02 kbytes
>
>There you have it, 5,356 kbytes -- 5.4 megabytes! -- of Tholen's
>claptrap. Tholen _sure_ reduces clutter in newsgroups. And I'm a
>multimillionaire!

Tholen likes a neat, tidy newsgroup. That's why he multi-posts his
spam into three different newsgroups.

--
The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about at every
opportunity:

"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]
should be your concern, Deco."
-- David Tholen

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 1:02:30 PM8/7/08

to

--
Art Deco writes:

15442> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15442> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15442> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15442> Tell us [tinu] what you really think, Tholen.

What does your request have to do with OS/2, Deco, and who are you
allegedly speaking for when you say "us"?

15442> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15442> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15443> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15443> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15443> Aye now, that's a good laddie. Noew run along and do it again,
boy.

Classic ambiguity.

15443> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15443> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15444> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15444> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15444> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15444> I see that you completely evaded the matter of your multi-
posting to
15444> irrelevant newsgroups, Tholen. No surprise there, really.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15444> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15444> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15445> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15445> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15445> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15445> So how come I don't get my own personalized digest, Tholen?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Deco?

15445> I feel slighted.

What does your feeling have to do with OS/2, Deco?

15445> *sniff*

15445> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15445> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15445> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be
worhsipped [sic]
15445> should be your concern, Deco."
15445> -- David Tholen

Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't
understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical of him,
considering his own remarks:

"Oh lookie, my boilerplate spam from the Davie Files is now
up to 80 lines."
--Art Deco

"I order you to add this quote to your boilerplate spam."
--Art Deco

"Out-of-context quotes in your boilerplate spam, Davie,
how kooky."
--Art Deco

"This was in response to your boilerplate spam that includes
out-of-context quotes by different people."
--Art Deco

"Put my words into your boilerplate screed, Tholen, without
your selective, out-of-context quoting. I dare you."
--Art Deco

"Just more of your boilerplate screed, without meaning."
--Art Deco

"Along with his spamming of his boilerplate screeds"
--Art Deco

"Classic control issues on your part, given that you are
powerless to stop me from doing as I please, other than
repeated whining via your boilerplate screed. No surprise
here, really."
--Art Deco

Deco is still operating under the delusion that his family name is
Deco:

Message-ID: <290720060819346837%er...@netcabal.com>

"Apparently in Tholen World, everyone is supposed to refer to
everyone else solely by their family name, anything else is
verboten."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <050820060758108935%er...@netcabal.com>

"My personal favorite is how he demands that everyone refer to
him as 'tho...@antispam.ham', yet when he quotes others, he
hacks everything off except what he figures is the family name."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <240220070923413658%er...@caballista.org>

"One last note about the holy digestor -- as it is a reflection
of Davey's bizarre world where everyone must be referred to only
by their family name"
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <120420071251145347%er...@caballista.org>

"This behavior can be explained by Davie's apparent belief that
all should be referenced by their family name alone and nothing
else."
--Art Deco

Message-ID: <090520071324119553%er...@caballista.org>

"As for why he thinks people should only use family names, I
have no idea."
--Art Deco

Caught in a rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:

Message-ID: <300720071940133793%er...@caballista.org>

"It is plainly evident to anyone with a pair of neurons that
you use either the family name or some other form of shorthand
to form the labels for your oh-so-important count categories."
--Art Deco

Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or".

But consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons,
and that's according to Deco himself.

I see that you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
Deco. No surprise there, really.

Did you finally figure out what your earlier posting had to do with
demon.local, Deco? You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the
distribution and then ask what your posting had to do with that
newsgroup.

I see that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.

"Not one of which was posted to rec.music.classical, yet you felt
it
necessary to spew your off-topic regurgitation into an irrelevant
newsgroup anyway."
--Art Deco

How ironic.

What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant
newsgroups to which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really
expecting an answer from you, Deco.

"Another tedious load of Tholen Lames (forwarded to rsbc so the
regulars can see the deleterious effects of many years of close
exposure to the Holy Digestor.
--Art Deco

"Oh look, the digests have infected rec.sport.basketball.college."
--Art Deco

Courtesy of you, Deco.

"Tread carefully, Tholen, 'Archie Leach' is another
one of my sockpuppets."
--Art Deco

"Archie Leach wrote:
WAY TO GO, HAGAR!!! WE KNOW YOU TRIED YOUR DAMNDEST!!!"
--Art Deco

So, Deco is responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional
help, Deco.

"I don't read dictionaries, tholen."
--Art Deco

No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to
you if you want to look like a fool.

"Why do you keep spamming this quote over and over, Tholen?
I did not write it."
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I
provided the first time you made the accusation.

"Or perhaps your pathetic Holy Digestor FORTRAN code can't handle a
five-digit total?"
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your
posting
total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that
the combined total from all posters was correctly reported to five
digits
over three years ago.

"So ham, do you think 'deco' can make it to four-figures in a
single
'year'?"
--Art Deco

Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that Deco made
it to four figures in a single year for three years running.

"the FNVW is also my sockpuppet."
--Art Deco

"Everything I type is a lie."
--Art Deco

"Who is 'Art Deco', Tholen?"
--Art Deco

"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali

"It's Time for Art Deco to Remove Itself From Usenet Altogether."
--Richard Head

"Deco, he's showing the world what a lame fuck you really are."
--Hagar

"Deco, you sick obsessed freak. Get help."
--Miguel

"Get a life, Deco."
--Miguel

"Actually, I haven't a clue"
--Art Deco

"I don't need a memory"
--Art Deco

Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco.

"To which newsgroups have I followed you around?"
--Art Deco

"I monitor your personal sandbox"
--Art Deco

Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me,
Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory.

"True that, but he apparently just lost his wife of many years,
and I no longer feel comfortable poking him."
--Art Deco

So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so
under normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco.

"[massive sneckage]"
--Art Deco

"You removed the context"
--Art Deco

Classic hypocrisy.

"99.9% of the traffic in cooa consists of your digests and
people replying to them"
--Art Deco

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco, after
you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
follow-up to those articles. In other words, you're responsible for
most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.

"...which have nothing to do with the topic of the groups you
multi-post them into."
--Art Deco, who cross-posts to newsgroups that have nothing
to do with the topic of the groups he cross-posts them into,
including:

24hoursupport.helpdesk
alt.usage.english
alt.2600
alt.usenet.kooks
alt.alien.research alt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-
whore
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
aus.general
alt.alien.visitors
aus.invest
alt.antichristnet
aus.science
alt.aratzio
cam.misc
alt.astronomy
comp.lang.fortran
alt.astronomy.art-deco
comp.os.linux.advocacy
alt.atheism
comp.os.os2.advocacy
alt.bad.clams
comp.os.os2.apps
alt.bible.prophecy
comp.os.os2.misc
alt.buzzard.rules
comp.sys.mac
alt.cascade
demon.local
alt.christnet.christianlife
gac.physics.astronomy
alt.christnet.prayer
ne.weather
alt.comedy.standup
news.groups
alt.conspriacy
rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
alt.culture.alaska rec.arts.movies.current-
films
alt.digestors.holy
rec.arts.poems
alt.fan.art-bell
rec.arts.sf.written
alt.fan.art-bell.art-deco
rec.aviation.products
alt.fan.keanu-reeves
rec.gambling.lottery
alt.fan.letter.m
rec.music.classical
alt.fan.madonna
rec.org.mensa
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
rec.sports.basketball.college
alt.fan.states.new-jersey
rec.sports.football.college
alt.fan.states.texas
rec.woodworking
alt.fan.steveleyland
sci.archaeology
alt.flame
sci.astro
alt.fucknozzles
sci.electronics.basics
alt.gothic
sci.electronics.design
alt.hackers.malicious
sci.geo.earthquakes
alt.home.repair
sci.geo.geology
alt.languages.french
sci.math
alt.messianic
sci.med.cardiology
alt.music.michael-jackson
sci.philosophy.tech
alt.music.white-power
sci.physics
alt.non.sequitur sci.physics.cond-
matter
alt.os.windows-xp
sci.physics.relativity
alt.paranet.ufo
sci.psychology.psychotherapy
alt.paranormal.crop-circles
sci.skeptic
alt.psychology.help
sci.space.history
alt.religion.christian
sci.space.policy
alt.religion.islam
soc.culture.israel
alt.religion.kibology
soc.culture.jewish
alt.revisionism
soc.men
alt.sailing.asa
soc.singles
alt.satellite.tv.europe soc.subculture.bondage-
bdsm
alt.sci.physics.new-theories
talk.politics.misc
alt.security.alarms
triangle.general
alt.snuh uk.food
+drink.misc
alt.society.liberalism uk.media.radio.bbc-
r4
alt.spirituality.radical-faerie
uk.sci.astronomy
alt.troll

================================================================================

Maxwell Isn't Smart <luv2^fl...@get.smart.damnit.com> writes:

1> Newsgroups: alt.music.white-
power,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,rec.music.classical,alt.horror,uk.local.surrey

1> Why are you posting this in alt.horror?

2> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.fan.art-
bell,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.astronomy

2> Hi, Tholen!

3> Newsgroups:
alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,alt.fan.art-
bell,rec.sport.basketball.college,alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

3> Hi, Tholen!

What does that have to do with OS/2, Smart?

================================================================================

Riffuceus <Ri...@use.net> writes:

2> Newsgroups: alt.music.white-
power,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,rec.music.classical,alt.horror,uk.local.surrey

2> Got bored of *owning* teh internet, so topped himself ?

What does that have to do with OS/2, Riffuceus?

================================================================================

VH's Plastic People of the Universe <pla...@plastic.com> writes:

1> Newsgroups: alt.music.white-
power,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,demon.local,rec.music.classical,alt.horror,uk.local.surrey

1> where is teh munky?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Plastic?

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 8:32:07 PM8/7/08

to

Right on cue, "Totally unorganized", "total flake", "totally off the
wall" Joseph Malloy writes:

401> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

401> I feel for you, Art, and continue to hope that maybe someday
nelohT will
401> grant you the favor of your own personalized digest.

What does your feeling for Art have to do with OS/2, Malloy?

401> In the meantime, I continue to revel in the fact that nelohT

Who is "nelohT", Malloy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using
that alias.

401> and some fool called "Tholen"

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> continue to praise me and me alone.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> Note: I don't just criticize Tholen,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

401> I cite independent truth!

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Remember, when you
"cite" something, they become your own words, according to your
earlier claims, Malloy, thus it is impossible for you to cite
anything "independent".

401> None of the websites listed below have anything of mine or have
401> been influenced by me.

Irrelevant, given that nobody has claimed otherwise, Malloy. But how
do you know whom you have influenced or not influenced with your
irrelevant postings to a newsgroup about an operating system that you
don't use, Malloy? Interesting to see that you believe that you have
no influence on anyone, Malloy. Talk about futility.

401> For anyone interested, here are a few websites that begin to
explain
401> Tholen's Not-so-Grand Delusion that he knows what he is talking
about:

Classic erroneous presupposition of any delusion on my part, Malloy.
Rather ironic, coming from someone as deluded as yourself, Malloy.

401> Analysis of Tholen's demented and deranged mind:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> You too can sound like Tholen in a box:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> Tholen's Numerous Kook Awards:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> Summary of Kookology re: Tholen:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> Proof that Tholen's an antagonist of the morally bankrupt sort:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

401> * Search Google for a disparaging use of the word "queer" in:

What does that have to do with OS/2, Malloy?

401> [N.B.: Tholen won't include the URLs above when he pretends to
respond
401> because he's too embarrassed by them!]

What do your URLs have to do with OS/2, Malloy?

At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
know what he's talking about:

"me: 'Do you have Os/2?'

them: 'What's ohh-esstu, dude?'

me: 'Beats me.'"
--Joe Malloy

You also like to portray yourself as an astrologer by altering
subject lines:

] Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 16:11:26 -0500
] From: jmalloy <j_t_m...@yahoo.com>
] User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
] Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Tholen's waste of electrons digest, volume 2454133
] Message-ID: <45c64bfe$0$28131$4c36...@roadrunner.com>

"Especially since the astrologer doesn't realize that electrons
are re-used."
--Joe Malloy, astrologer

"My true motivation is to expose Tholen as a waster of electrons"
--Joe Malloy, astrologer (2007 Dec 11)

Still waiting for a response to:

Q: Who was ignored for the better part of two years but continued to
harass the person ignoring him, going to the extent of seeking out
postings made by that person in other newsgroups for purposes of
exporting that harassment to those other newsgroups?

A: Malloy.

Q: Who is a non-OS/2 user harassing an OS/2 user in an OS/2
newsgroup?

A: Malloy.

Q: Who keeps alleged "terabytes" of alleged "foolishness" for
reference
purposes?

A: "In fact, I've *terabytes* of your foolishness!"
--Joe Malloy

Obsession: thy name is Malloy.

193 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them.
Classic
inconsistency.

Also rather hypocritical of you to waste electrons by posting, Malloy.

I see that you didn't bother to answer several questions, Malloy. No
surprise there, really.

"Man sagt: Sie sind ein Misanthrop!"
--Joe Malloy, plagiarist

Message-ID: <ld4f8.144123$dh.37...@typhoon.nyroc.rr.com>

"No wonder he's trying to be a kook like Tholen!"
--Joe Malloy

Message-ID: <XOpNa.11858$ma.1...@twister.nyroc.rr.com>

"Meanwhile, we've seen your posts many, many, oh-so-often many
times
before, you kook."
--Joe Malloy

"It takes a kook to recognize another kook, Tholen."
--Joe Malloy

Ergo, Joe Malloy must believe that Joe Malloy is a kook.

[N.B.: Malloy won't include the above when he pretends to respond
because he's too embarrassed by them!]

And another prediction came true.

Art Deco

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 9:32:37 PM8/7/08

to

:nelohT

>Right on cue, "Totally unorganized", "total flake", "totally

>off the wall" Joseph Malloy writes: What does your feeling
>for Art have to do with OS/2, Malloy? Who is "nelohT",

>Malloy? There is nobody in this newsgroup using that alias.

>Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Remember, when
>you "cite" something, they become your own words, according
>to your earlier claims, Malloy, thus it is impossible for

>you to cite anything "independent". Irrelevant, given that

>nobody has claimed otherwise, Malloy. But how do you know
>whom you have influenced or not influenced with your
>irrelevant postings to a newsgroup about an operating system
>that you don't use, Malloy? Interesting to see that you
>believe that you have no influence on anyone, Malloy. Talk

>about futility. Classic erroneous presupposition of any

>delusion on my part, Malloy. Rather ironic, coming from

>someone as deluded as yourself, Malloy. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. What does that have to do
>with OS/2, Malloy? What do your URLs have to do with OS/2,

>Malloy? At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having
>written "Tholeln" in a subject line prior to a particular
>date, Malloy. Of course, you're the one who likes to portray
>himself as someone who doesn't know what he's talking about:

>You also like to portray yourself as an astrologer by

>altering subject lines: Still waiting for a response to: Q:

>Who was ignored for the better part of two years but
>continued to harass the person ignoring him, going to the
>extent of seeking out postings made by that person in other
>newsgroups for purposes of exporting that harassment to
>those other newsgroups? A: Malloy. Q: Who is a non-OS/2 user
>harassing an OS/2 user in an OS/2 newsgroup? A: Malloy. Q:
>Who keeps alleged "terabytes" of alleged "foolishness" for

>reference purposes? Obsession: thy name is Malloy. 193

>postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them.
>Classic inconsistency. Also rather hypocritical of you to
>waste electrons by posting, Malloy. I see that you didn't
>bother to answer several questions, Malloy. No surprise

>there, really. Ergo, Joe Malloy must believe that Joe Malloy
>is a kook. [N.B.: Malloy won't include the above when he
>pretends to respond because he's too embarrassed by them!]
>And another prediction came true. -- Art Deco writes: Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. What does your request

>have to do with OS/2, Deco, and who are you allegedly

>speaking for when you say "us"? Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic ambiguity. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. What does your question
>have to do with OS/2, Deco? What does your feeling have to
>do with OS/2, Deco? Classic erroneous presupposition.

>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical

>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a

>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:

>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco. No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local, Deco?
>You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the distribution
>and then ask what your posting had to do with that
>newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter of
>your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No

>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing

>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an

>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is

>responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional

>help, Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words,

>Deco, but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool.

>Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem,
>Deco, given that I clearly stated that I never said that you
>wrote the quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the
>quote, Deco, and that's because Art Deco did write the
>quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I provided the

>first time you made the accusation. Further evidence of your

>counting problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't
>reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
>further evidence of your reading comprehension problem,
>Deco, given that the combined total from all posters was
>correctly reported to five digits over three years ago.

>Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that
>Deco made it to four figures in a single year for three

>years running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of
>Oz", Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups

>you've followed me, Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a

>memory. So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're

>comfortable doing so under normal circumstances. Seek

>professional help, Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic

>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
>traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco,
>after you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and
>then the ongoing follow-up to those articles. In other
>words, you're responsible for most of the traffic in cooa,

>Deco. 24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600

>Maxwell Isn't Smart <luv2^fl...@get.smart.damnit.com>

>writes: What does that have to do with OS/2, Smart?
>Riffuceus <Ri...@use.net> writes: What does that have to do
>with OS/2, Riffuceus? VH's Plastic People of the Universe
><pla...@plastic.com> writes: What does your question have
>to do with OS/2, Plastic? -- Art Deco writes: Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. What does your request

>have to do with OS/2, Deco, and who are you allegedly

>speaking for when you say "us"? Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic ambiguity. Classic erroneous presupposition.
>Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Classic erroneous presupposition. Still
>suffering from attribution problems, Deco? Classic
>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. What does your question
>have to do with OS/2, Deco? What does your feeling have to
>do with OS/2, Deco? Classic erroneous presupposition.

>Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still
>doesn't understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical

>of him, considering his own remarks: Deco is still operating
>under the delusion that his family name is Deco: Caught in a

>rather obvious lie, Deco has now started backpedalling:

>Classic inconsistency; first "only", now "either...or". But
>consider the implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of
>neurons, and that's according to Deco himself. I see that
>you evaded the evidence for your psychic usenet astrology,
>Deco. No surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out
>what your earlier posting had to do with demon.local, Deco?
>You did, after all, add the newsgroup to the distribution
>and then ask what your posting had to do with that
>newsgroup. I see that you completely evaded the matter of
>your cross-posting to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No

>surprise there, really. How ironic. What does your ongoing

>"kookdance" have to do with the irrelevant newsgroups to
>which you cross-post, Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an

>answer from you, Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is

>responding to one of his sockpuppets. Seek professional

>help, Deco. No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words,

>Deco, but it's up to you if you want to look like a fool.

>Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem,
>Deco, given that I clearly stated that I never said that you
>wrote the quote. Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the
>quote, Deco, and that's because Art Deco did write the
>quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I provided the

>first time you made the accusation. Further evidence of your

>counting problem, Deco, given that your posting total hadn't
>reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
>further evidence of your reading comprehension problem,
>Deco, given that the combined total from all posters was
>correctly reported to five digits over three years ago.

>Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that
>Deco made it to four figures in a single year for three

>years running. Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of
>Oz", Deco. Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups

>you've followed me, Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a

>memory. So, you admit to poking people, Deco, and you're

>comfortable doing so under normal circumstances. Seek

>professional help, Deco. Classic hypocrisy. Classic

>unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
>traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco,
>after you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and
>then the ongoing follow-up to those articles. In other
>words, you're responsible for most of the traffic in cooa,

>Deco. 24hoursupport.helpdesk alt.usage.english alt.2600

>Maxwell Isn't Smart <luv2^fl...@get.smart.damnit.com>

>writes: What does that have to do with classical music,
>Smart? Riffuceus <Ri...@use.net> writes: What does that have
>to do with classical music, Riffuceus? VH's Plastic People
>of the Universe <pla...@plastic.com> writes: What does your
>question have to do with classical music, Plastic? alias #
>today total year 5 year 4 year 3 year 2 year 1
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
>------ deco 4 506 3989 4393 3722 2268 0 cockbrain 143 520
>445 90 0 0 ah 108 1122 669 320 112 0 snarky 65 0 103 0 0 0
>nobuyout 32 559 5 0 0 0 homintern 26 0 5 0 0 0 yardwork 19 0
>0 0 0 0 goat 15 0 3 0 0 0 meow 14 0 1 1 4 0 demon 10 0 60 11
>0 0 bisectional 6 43 33 154 377 0 smart 3 3 0 0 0 0 0
>harding 2 3 1 0 0 0 pinku 1 4 0 24 2 0 plastic 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
>pluto 1 44 8 0 0 0 riffuceus 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 --------------
>------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ 17 9 953 11744
>11359 11687 9100 10033 -- Art Deco writes: Still suffering
>from attribution problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and
>erroneous claim. What does your request have to do with

>OS/2, Deco, and who are you allegedly speaking for when you

>say "us"? Classic erroneous presupposition. Still suffering
>from attribution problems, Deco? Classic ambiguity. Classic
>erroneous presupposition. Still suffering from attribution
>problems, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Still suffering from attribution problems,
>Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. What does
>your question have to do with OS/2, Deco? What does your
>feeling have to do with OS/2, Deco? Classic erroneous
>presupposition. Boilerplate spam from Art Deco,

>demonstrating that he still doesn't understand what a
>signature is for. How hypocritical of him, considering his

>own remarks: Deco is still operating under the delusion that
>his family name is Deco: Caught in a rather obvious lie,
>Deco has now started backpedalling: Classic inconsistency;

>first "only", now "either...or". But consider the
>implication: Deco doesn't have a pair of neurons, and that's
>according to Deco himself. I see that you evaded the
>evidence for your psychic usenet astrology, Deco. No
>surprise there, really. Did you finally figure out what your
>earlier posting had to do with demon.local, Deco? You did,
>after all, add the newsgroup to the distribution and then
>ask what your posting had to do with that newsgroup. I see
>that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting
>to irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.

>How ironic. What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do
>with the irrelevant newsgroups to which you cross-post,
>Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an answer from you,

>Deco. Courtesy of you, Deco. So, Deco is responding to one
>of his sockpuppets. Seek professional help, Deco. No wonder

>you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to

>you if you want to look like a fool. Further evidence of

>your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that I
>clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
>Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and
>that's because Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by
>the message ID that I provided the first time you made the

>accusation. Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco,

>given that your posting total hadn't reached five digits at
>the time of your question. Also further evidence of your
>reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that the combined
>total from all posters was correctly reported to five digits

>over three years ago. Further evidence of your counting

>problem, Deco, given that Deco made it to four figures in a

>single year for three years running. Don't bother
>auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco. Having trouble

>remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me, Deco? Oh

>that's right. You don't need a memory. So, you admit to

>poking people, Deco, and you're comfortable doing so under

>normal circumstances. Seek professional help, Deco. Classic
>hypocrisy. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

>Rather, most of the traffic in cooa consists of people
>responding to you, Deco, after you've added the newsgroup to
>the distribution, and then the ongoing follow-up to those
>articles. In other words, you're responsible for most of the

>traffic in cooa, Deco. 24hoursupport.helpdesk

>Maxwell Isn't Smart <luv2^fl...@get.smart.damnit.com>

>writes: What does that have to do with college basketball,
>Smart?

Another load of multi-posted hate from the keyboard of Tholen.

--

The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about at every

opportunity:

"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]

should be your concern, Deco."

-- David Tholen

Art Deco

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 9:33:21 PM8/7/08

to

:nelohT Double email

>Seek professional help, Deco.

Practice what you preach, Tholen.

--

The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about at every

opportunity:

"Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be worhsipped [sic]

should be your concern, Deco."

-- David Tholen

Art Deco

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 9:40:05 PM8/7/08

to

:nelohT Double email

>alias # today total year 5 year 4 year 3 year 2
>year 1
>-------------- ------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------
>------
>deco 4 506 3989 4393 3722
>2268 0

Good laddie! Ye can have a scone now.

Art Deco

unread,

Aug 7, 2008, 9:43:48 PM8/7/08

to

:nelohT Double email

>15442> Tell us [tinu] what you really think, Tholen.
>

>What does your request have to do with OS/2, Deco,

Interesting that you are asking this question in a college basketball
newsgroup, Tholen.

>and who are you
>allegedly speaking for when you say "us"?

Your reading comprehension problem is noted, Tholen.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu

unread,

Aug 8, 2008, 1:40:59 PM8/8/08

to

--
Art Deco writes:

15446> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15446> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15446> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15446> Good laddie! Ye can have a scone now.

Non sequitur.

15446> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15446> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15447> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15447> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15447> Another load of multi-posted hate from the keyboard of Tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15447> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15447> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15448> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15448> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15448> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15448> Practice what you preach, Tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15448> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15448> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15449> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15449> It is an indeed an impressive achievement that any few lines of
text
15449> posted by you *forces* Tholen/nelohT to push his "post" button
with a
15449> completely new and personalized subject line.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather ironic, coming
from someone who is "forced" to push his "post" button multiple times
in response to the same article, and in the recent past, while also
being "forced" to add multiple irrelevant newsgroups to the
distribution. Who is "Tholen/nelohT", Deco? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.

15449> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15449> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15450> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

15450> :nelohT

Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?

15450> Double email

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

15450> Classic Tholen 'tard lame, Tholen.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15450> Yes, Tholen, I'm well aware that you lack any and all self-
control and
15450> allow other people to force you into pushing the "post" button
on your
15450> own newsreader client. There is no need to remind me.

Classic erroneous presupposition. Rather ironic, coming from someone
who is "forced" to push his "post" button multiple times in response
to the same article, and in the recent past, while also being "forced"
to add multiple irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution.

15450> The famous .sig file quote that Wee Davie Tholen whines about
at every
15450> opportunity:

Classic erroneous presupposition.

15450> "Substantiation that you regard yourself as a God to be
worhsipped [sic]
15450> should be your concern, Deco."
15450> -- David Tholen

Boilerplate spam from Art Deco, demonstrating that he still doesn't
understand what a signature is for. How hypocritical of him,
considering his own remarks:

"Oh lookie, my boilerplate spam from the Davie Files is now

up to 80 lines."
--Art Deco