Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Vote! The 2012 Labour Day Favorite Derbyshire Sock Award
30 views
Skip to first unread message
Fred Hall
Aug 31, 2012, 11:21:16 AM8/31/12
to
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:18:52 -0700 (PDT), Aratzio <0rec...@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, August 31, 2012 10:02:50 AM UTC-5, Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:53:35 -0500, Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >List your favourite Derbyshire sock! Results will be posted
>>
>> >when the Kook Awards votes are posted. My choice:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >Seamus MacRae. What a dumbass.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >For fuck's sake, he won back in 2009!
>>
>>
>>
>> PS
>>
>>
>>
>> Even kooks are allowed to vote on this award.
>>
>> --
>> Ferd the turd
>
>I vote for Ferd the turd for the "Anal Puss-Wart of the Century" award !!
Moron.
*rePlonk*
--
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
>On Friday, August 31, 2012 10:02:50 AM UTC-5, Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler wrote:
>> On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 09:53:35 -0500, Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler <fn...@databasix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >List your favourite Derbyshire sock! Results will be posted
>>
>> >when the Kook Awards votes are posted. My choice:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >Seamus MacRae. What a dumbass.
>>
>> >
>>
>> >For fuck's sake, he won back in 2009!
>>
>>
>>
>> PS
>>
>>
>>
>> Even kooks are allowed to vote on this award.
>>
>> --
>> Ferd the turd
>
>I vote for Ferd the turd for the "Anal Puss-Wart of the Century" award !!
Moron.
*rePlonk*
--
August 2012 nominations:
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/2012/08/august-2012-nominations.html
http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html
http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Aug 31, 2012, 6:20:38 PM8/31/12
to
Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> writes:
312> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
312> Moron.
What does Aratzio's moronness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
312> *rePlonk*
Famous relast word.
312> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
312> Moron.
What does Aratzio's moronness have to do with OS/2, Hall?
312> *rePlonk*
Famous relast word.
kensi
Aug 31, 2012, 6:43:24 PM8/31/12
to
On 31/08/2012 6:20 PM, tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> 312> *rePlonk*
>
> Famous relast word.
OMG. Tholen made a funny -- one of the signs of the apocalypse!
> 312> *rePlonk*
>
> Famous relast word.
--
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 1, 2012, 5:24:39 AM9/1/12
to
kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> writes:
83> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
83> OMG. Tholen made a funny -- one of the signs of the apocalypse!
What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, kensi?
83> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
83> OMG. Tholen made a funny -- one of the signs of the apocalypse!
What does your delusion have to do with OS/2, kensi?
kensi
Sep 2, 2012, 12:10:08 AM9/2/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 2, 2012, 8:10:32 AM9/2/12
to
kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> writes:
92> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
92> To which alleged "delusion" are you referring, ko0ky?
Who is "ko0ky", kensi? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
92> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
92> To which alleged "delusion" are you referring, ko0ky?
Who is "ko0ky", kensi? There is nobody in this newsgroup
using that alias.
dccxxvii
Sep 2, 2012, 10:42:33 AM9/2/12
to
tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> writes:
>
> > Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.madonna
> kensi <kensi_ke...@zoonoses.invalid> writes:
>
>
> > To which alleged "delusion" are you referring, ko0ky?
>
> Who is "ko0ky", kensi? There is nobody in this newsgroup
> using that alias.
You're about as ko0ky as anyone gets, tholen.
> > To which alleged "delusion" are you referring, ko0ky?
>
> Who is "ko0ky", kensi? There is nobody in this newsgroup
> using that alias.
Why else would you rather post off topic questions about "ko0ky's"
identity than answer my on topic questions in a reasonable way?
--
========
dccxxvii
========
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 2, 2012, 6:17:00 PM9/2/12
to
"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
77> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
77> You're about as ko0ky as anyone gets, tholen.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have
to do with OS/2, dccxxvii? After all, you're the one who thinks
he's "god".
77> Why else would you rather post off topic questions about "ko0ky's"
77> identity than answer my on topic questions in a reasonable way?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, dccxxvii?
ah asked Gavrael if he/she is now or ever has been a pussy, and
dccxxvii answered the question, as if it had been asked to him/her.
Less than four minutes later, Gavrael also answered the question,
from the same NNTP posting host:
] From: "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com>
] Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Self tickling
] Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
] Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
] Message-ID: <k0plnj$r2t$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: iqXbBdz2QgPwmwQfNHmYCA.user.speranza.aioe.org
] From: "Gavrael" <Gav...@ymail.com>
] Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Self tickling
] Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
] Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
] Message-ID: <k0pltn$rdd$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: iqXbBdz2QgPwmwQfNHmYCA.user.speranza.aioe.org
No wonder dccxxvii has such trouble with proper attributions. He/she
can't even keep track of who he/she is.
] From: "God" <g...@godnet.god>
] Subject: Re: Jeff Relf has set a bad example.
] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
] Message-ID: <k1iddo$m94$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
] From: "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com>
] Subject: Re: Monday, August 13 2012
] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
] Message-ID: <k1idk8$mkp$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
And yet you still take the "From:" line as representing reality
for others, dccxxvii. What does your inconsistency have to do with
OS/2, dccxxvii?
77> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
77> You're about as ko0ky as anyone gets, tholen.
What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have
to do with OS/2, dccxxvii? After all, you're the one who thinks
he's "god".
77> Why else would you rather post off topic questions about "ko0ky's"
77> identity than answer my on topic questions in a reasonable way?
What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, dccxxvii?
ah asked Gavrael if he/she is now or ever has been a pussy, and
dccxxvii answered the question, as if it had been asked to him/her.
Less than four minutes later, Gavrael also answered the question,
from the same NNTP posting host:
] From: "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com>
] Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Self tickling
] Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:14:59 +0000 (UTC)
] Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
] Message-ID: <k0plnj$r2t$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: iqXbBdz2QgPwmwQfNHmYCA.user.speranza.aioe.org
] From: "Gavrael" <Gav...@ymail.com>
] Newsgroups: alt.talk.bollocks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
] Subject: Re: Self tickling
] Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2012 03:18:15 +0000 (UTC)
] Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
] Message-ID: <k0pltn$rdd$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: iqXbBdz2QgPwmwQfNHmYCA.user.speranza.aioe.org
No wonder dccxxvii has such trouble with proper attributions. He/she
can't even keep track of who he/she is.
] From: "God" <g...@godnet.god>
] Subject: Re: Jeff Relf has set a bad example.
] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
] Message-ID: <k1iddo$m94$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
] From: "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com>
] Subject: Re: Monday, August 13 2012
] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
] Message-ID: <k1idk8$mkp$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
And yet you still take the "From:" line as representing reality
for others, dccxxvii. What does your inconsistency have to do with
OS/2, dccxxvii?
dccxxvii
Sep 3, 2012, 1:04:40 AM9/3/12
to
tho...@antispam.ham wrote:
> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 77> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 77> You're about as ko0ky as anyone gets, tholen.
>
> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim...
> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 77> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 77> You're about as ko0ky as anyone gets, tholen.
>
It's substantiated by everything you post, even the message I'm
replying to.
> After all, you're the one who thinks he's "god".
You're the one who posts from the email address of David Tholen but
doesn't understand why anyone would call you David.
> 77> Why else would you rather post off topic questions about "ko0ky's"
> 77> identity than answer my on topic questions in a reasonable way?
> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
> OS/2, dccxxvii?
available on topic ones.
> ] From: "God" <g...@godnet.god>
> ] Subject: Re: Jeff Relf has set a bad example.
> ] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:26:33 +0000 (UTC)
> ] Message-ID: <k1iddo$m94$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
> ] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
> ] From: "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com>
> ] Subject: Re: Monday, August 13 2012
> ] Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC)
> ] Message-ID: <k1idk8$mkp$1...@speranza.aioe.org>
> ] NNTP-Posting-Host: 3Qeo4W9Y5gzUuxWcQ3O6Mw.user.speranza.aioe.org
> And yet you still take the "From:" line as representing reality
> for others, dccxxvii. What does your inconsistency have to do with
> OS/2, dccxxvii?
--
========
dccxxvii
========
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 4, 2012, 1:57:00 PM9/4/12
to
"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
89> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
89> It's substantiated by everything you post, even the message I'm
89> replying to.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You have no sense of humour either.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You're the one who posts from the email address of David Tholen
but
89> doesn't understand why anyone would call you David.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> Whatever, you still reply to off topic post in preference to the
89> available on topic ones.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You still don't deny you are David Tholen then?
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
89> It's substantiated by everything you post, even the message I'm
89> replying to.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You have no sense of humour either.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You're the one who posts from the email address of David Tholen
but
89> doesn't understand why anyone would call you David.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> Whatever, you still reply to off topic post in preference to the
89> available on topic ones.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
89> You still don't deny you are David Tholen then?
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
dccxxvii
Sep 4, 2012, 3:09:23 PM9/4/12
to
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> > It's substantiated by everything you post, even the message I'm
> > replying to.
> "[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 advocacy ....]"
advocacy ....]"? So why do you post it, and why do you think it's
hypocritical of me to bring up what you post to the group.
====
> > You have no sense of humour either.
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
You think I have no sense of humour either? I think you're wrong, try
this.
What do you call a lesbian dinosaur?
Lickalottapus.
Maybe you're right.
====
> > You're the one who posts from the email address of David Tholen
> > but doesn't understand why anyone would call you David.
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
Hardly, no-one's called me David so I've had no chance to deny it.
====
> > Whatever, you still reply to off topic post in preference to the
> > available on topic ones.
> Nothing of relevence to OS/2 advocacy ....
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
Challenging your preference for off topic posts is hypocrisy? You do it
to people all the time, hypocrite.
====
> > You still don't deny you are David Tholen then?
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
No, I definitely deny being David Tholen. Do you?
--
========
dccxxvii
========
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
> > It's substantiated by everything you post, even the message I'm
> "[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 advocacy ....]"
> --dccxxvii
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
Your point is everything you post is "[Nothing of relevence to OS/2
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
advocacy ....]"? So why do you post it, and why do you think it's
hypocritical of me to bring up what you post to the group.
====
> > You have no sense of humour either.
You think I have no sense of humour either? I think you're wrong, try
this.
What do you call a lesbian dinosaur?
Lickalottapus.
Maybe you're right.
====
> > You're the one who posts from the email address of David Tholen
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
Hardly, no-one's called me David so I've had no chance to deny it.
====
> > Whatever, you still reply to off topic post in preference to the
> Nothing of relevence to OS/2 advocacy ....
> Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
Challenging your preference for off topic posts is hypocrisy? You do it
to people all the time, hypocrite.
====
> > You still don't deny you are David Tholen then?
No, I definitely deny being David Tholen. Do you?
--
========
dccxxvii
========
tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu
Sep 9, 2012, 6:52:19 PM9/9/12
to
"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
102> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
102> Your point is everything you post is "[Nothing of relevence to OS/
2
102> advocacy ....]"? So why do you post it, and why do you think it's
102> hypocritical of me to bring up what you post to the group.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dccxxvii?
My point is your hypocrisy, the evidence for which is based on
your continuing postings that have no relevance to OS/2 advocacy,
coupled with your complaints about the postings of others that
have no relevance to OS/2 advocacy, dccxxvii.
102> You think I have no sense of humour either? I think you're wrong,
try
102> this.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
102> Lickalottapus.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
it.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
do it
102> to people all the time, hypocrite.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
102> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
102> Your point is everything you post is "[Nothing of relevence to OS/
2
102> advocacy ....]"? So why do you post it, and why do you think it's
102> hypocritical of me to bring up what you post to the group.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dccxxvii?
My point is your hypocrisy, the evidence for which is based on
your continuing postings that have no relevance to OS/2 advocacy,
coupled with your complaints about the postings of others that
have no relevance to OS/2 advocacy, dccxxvii.
102> You think I have no sense of humour either? I think you're wrong,
try
102> this.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> What do you call a lesbian dinosaur?
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> Lickalottapus.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> Maybe you're right.
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> Hardly, no-one's called me David so I've had no chance to deny
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
it.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> Challenging your preference for off topic posts is hypocrisy? You
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
do it
102> to people all the time, hypocrite.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
102> No, I definitely deny being David Tholen. Do you?
Classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.
"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
0 new messages