Re: Neil Armstrong dies at 82 ...

[Double-A]

On Aug 27, 11:45 am, saulle...@cox.net wrote:
> I'M SURE ALL THE WACKOS HERE WILL BE LONG REMEMBERED TOO, DA!
>
> YEAH SURE THEY WILL!
>
> BAWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>
> ESPECIALLY THE PIG!  WHERE THE FUCKING HELL IS THE PIG?
>
> Saul Levy


Probably in a pit. I think Tholen invited him to an Hawiian luau!

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1114> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1114> Probably in a pit. I think Tholen invited him to an Hawiian
luau!

What does your thought have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

"If you really don't want to hear from me in comp.os.os2.advocacy
again, just tell me to go away, and I will."
--Double-A

"Bye."
--Double-A

And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.

[Double-A]

On Aug 28, 11:53 am, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1114> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1114> Probably in a pit.  I think Tholen invited him to an Hawiian
> luau!
>
> What does your thought have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

Day off, Tholen?

Double-A

[dizzy]

tholen tholed::

>And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.

No one wonders why some people call tholen a kook.

[Double-A]

Hey, your boss was looking for you yesterday! I told him you were
just screwing off on Usenet again. No need to thank me.

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1122> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1122> Day off, Tholen?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1123> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1123> Hey, your boss was looking for you yesterday! I told him you
were
1123> just screwing off on Usenet again. No need to thank me.

What do your lies have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

dizzy <di...@nospam.com> writes:

1571> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1571> tholen tholed::

What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?

1571> No one wonders why some people call tholen a kook.

How ironic, coming from the person who wrote:

"What is 'persent', tholoon?
Still suffering from spelling problems?"
--dizzy

after reading a reply written to something posted by
persent.

[faggot...@budweiser.com]

What does my k00kery have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

[dizzy]

tholen tholed:

>dizzy <di...@nospam.com> writes:
>
>1571> tholen tholed::

>
>1571> No one wonders why some people call tholen a kook.
>
>How ironic, coming from the person who wrote:
>
> "What is 'persent', tholoon?
> Still suffering from spelling problems?"
> --dizzy

Is that the best you can do, tholen?

Only a kook, like you, tholen, would claim that there's anything
"kooky" about the trivial "mistake" of thinking that "%" would spell
his name correctly as "percent".

So, thanks, tholen, for the supporting evidence that you are a kook.

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

dizzy <di...@nospam.com> writes:

1574> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1574> tholen tholed:

What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?

1574> Is that the best you can do, tholen?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

1574> Only a kook, like you, tholen,

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, dizzy?

1574> would claim that there's anything
1574> "kooky" about the trivial "mistake" of thinking that "%" would
spell
1574> his name correctly as "percent".

What does your thinking have to do with OS/2, dizzy? If you had
better *reading* comprehension skills, dizzy, you wouldn't look
like a kook.

1574> So, thanks, tholen, for the supporting evidence that you are a
kook.

What does your classic projection have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
You're the one with the reading comprehension problem.

[Double-A]

On Sep 18, 7:00 am, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

Tholen, why do you keep posting proof of your kOokhood to
alt.astromomy? We already know you're a kOok!

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1201> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1201> Tholen, why do you keep posting proof of your kOokhood to
1201> alt.astromomy?

What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

1201> We already know you're a kOok!

What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Double-A,
and who are you allegedly speaking for when you say "We"?

"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A

"If you really don't want to hear from me in comp.os.os2.advocacy
again, just tell me to go away, and I will."
--Double-A

"Bye."
--Double-A

[Double-A]

On Sep 18, 5:24 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1201> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1201> Tholen, why do you keep posting proof of your kOokhood to
> 1201> alt.astromomy?
>
> What does your classic erroneous presupposition of a question
> have to do with OS/2, Double-A?
>
> 1201> We already know you're a kOok!
>
> What does your hallucination have to do with OS/2, Double-A,
> and who are you allegedly speaking for when you say "We"?

Let me see, did you say that University of Hawaii coeds "are easy", or
not?

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1203> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1203> Let me see, did you say that University of Hawaii coeds "are
easy", or
1203> not?

What does your question have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

[Double-A]

On Sep 19, 2:42 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1203> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1203> Let me see, did you say that University of Hawaii coeds "are
> easy", or
> 1203> not?
>
> What does your question have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

OK, OK. Were the coeds you turored on OS/2 easy?

Double-A

[dccxxvii]

Both of them buggered him senseless, hence his current state.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1209> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1209> OK, OK. Were the coeds you turored on OS/2 easy?

What is "turored", Double-A?

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

140> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

"I restrict my posts to c.o.o.a to c.o.o.a"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

140> Both of them buggered him senseless, hence his current state.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

> > Both of them buggered him senseless, hence his current state.

> More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

I've never been buggered, senseless or otherwise, by two co-eds - so
what hypocrisy did you have in mind?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[Double-A]

On Sep 20, 3:11 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1209> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1209> OK, OK.  Were the coeds you turored on OS/2 easy?
>
> What is "turored", Double-A?

Tutored.

Cut me some slack! I have trouble seeing clearing what I have typed.
I need a big pair of pop bottle eyeglasses like you wear!

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1214> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1214> Tutored.

"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A

1214> Cut me some slack! I have trouble seeing clearing what I have
typed.
1214> I need a big pair of pop bottle eyeglasses like you wear!

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
OS/2, Double-A?

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

150> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

150> I've never been buggered, senseless or otherwise, by two co-eds -
so
150> what hypocrisy did you have in mind?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

[Double-A]

On Sep 22, 7:02 am, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1214> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1214> Tutored.
>
>    "I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
>       --Double-A
>
> 1214> Cut me some slack!  I have trouble seeing clearing what I have
> typed.
> 1214> I need a big pair of pop bottle eyeglasses like you wear!
>
> What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with
> OS/2, Double-A?

Which is the alleged erroneous presupposition, Tholen? My vision
problems, or your pop bottle glasses?

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1217> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1217> Which is the alleged erroneous presupposition, Tholen? My
vision
1217> problems, or your pop bottle glasses?

What do your questions have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

"I do nothing but ask OS/2 questions here"
--Double-A

[Double-A]

On Sep 22, 4:06 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1217> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1217> Which is the alleged erroneous presupposition, Tholen?  My
> vision
> 1217> problems, or your pop bottle glasses?

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1245> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1245> Message-ID: <51210935-067b-4dc5-99ec-
e634ff...@kg10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>

What does your empty response have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 150> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>

> > I've never been buggered, senseless or otherwise, by two co-eds -

> > so what hypocrisy did you have in mind?

> More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

If you don't know then fine, just say so.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

154> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

154> If you don't know then fine, just say so.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> >> > so what hypocrisy did you have in mind?

> >> More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

> > If you don't know then fine, just say so.

> More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

You can never back up your claims, troll tholen. What do your erroneous
claims of my hypocrisy have to do wih OS/2?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[Double-A]

On Sep 25, 1:40 pm, "tho...@antispam.ham" <tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu>
wrote:

> Double-A <double...@hush.com> writes:
>
> 1245> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 1245> Message-ID: <51210935-067b-4dc5-99ec-

> e634ff041...@kg10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>

>
> What does your empty response have to do with OS/2, Double-A?

I keep reposting waiting for you to answer the question.

Double-A

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

1248> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy

1248> I keep reposting waiting for you to answer the question.

I keep waiting for you to explain the relevance of your question
to OS/2, Double-A.

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

159> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

159> You can never back up your claims, troll tholen.

Who is "troll tholen", dccxxvii? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.

159> What do your erroneous claims of my hypocrisy have to do
159> wih OS/2?

Hardly erroneous, dccxxvii. Your recent postings have been
devoid of any OS/2 *advocacy*, despite your complaint about
postings by others that you claimed are devoid of any OS/2
*advocacy*, dccxxvii. That's classic hypocrisy on your part,
dccxxvii.

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> 159> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 159> You can never back up your claims, troll tholen.
>
> Who is "troll tholen", dccxxvii? There is nobody in this
> newsgroup using that alias.
>
> 159> What do your erroneous claims of my hypocrisy have to do
> 159> wih OS/2?
>
> Hardly erroneous, dccxxvii. Your recent postings have been

> devoid of any OS/2 advocacy, despite your complaint about

> postings by others that you claimed are devoid of any OS/2
> *advocacy*, dccxxvii. That's classic hypocrisy on your part,
> dccxxvii.

Pointing out that you, despite continuing with your childish,
self-appointed, task of challenging any posts you feel stray even
slightly with your limited and unreasonable view of what is appropriate
to post in no way constrains me to such limited beliefs, tholen you
troll. Hene pointing out your hypocrisy does not constitute hypocrisy
on my part.

Your continued attempts to send replies to your questions to alt.test
proves your hypocrisy conclusively.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> Double-A <doub...@hush.com> writes:

> And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.

No they don't.

Do you think your lie has anything to do with OS/2?

Do you think your lie has anything to do with alt.test?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

162> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

162> Pointing out that you, despite continuing with your childish,
162> self-appointed, task of challenging any posts you feel stray even
162> slightly with your limited and unreasonable view of what is
appropriate
162> to post in no way constrains me to such limited beliefs, tholen
you
162> troll. Hene pointing out your hypocrisy does not constitute
hypocrisy
162> on my part.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

162> Your continued attempts to send replies to your questions to
alt.test
162> proves your hypocrisy conclusively.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

163> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

163> No they don't.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

163> Do you think your lie has anything to do with OS/2?

Classic erroneous presupposition.

163> Do you think your lie has anything to do with alt.test?

Classic erroneous presupposition.

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> > Pointing out that you, despite continuing with your childish,

> > self-appointed, task of challenging any posts you feel stray even

> > slightly with your limited and unreasonable view of what is

> > appropriate to post in no way constrains me to such limited
beliefs, > > tholen you troll. Hence pointing out your hypocrisy does
not
> > constitute hypocrisy on my part.

> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Rubbish. As you can't quantify any grounds for objection my point holds
true.

> > Your continued attempts to send replies to your questions to

> > alt.test proves your hypocrisy conclusively.

> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

People can see your lies about not setting follow-ups to alt.test,
proven liar tholen.

===

> >> And some people wonder why I call them Famous Last Words.

> > No they don't.

> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Prove it, proven liar tholen.

===

> > Do you think your lie has anything to do with OS/2?

> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Gutless response, coward tholen.

> > Do you think your lie has anything to do with alt.test?

> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Repetitive and gutless response, unoriginal coward tholen.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

172> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

172> Rubbish. As you can't quantify any grounds for objection my point
holds
172> true.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

172> People can see your lies about not setting follow-ups to
alt.test,
172> proven liar tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

172> Prove it, proven liar tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

172> Gutless response, coward tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

172> Repetitive and gutless response, unoriginal coward tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>

> > Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

>
> > Rubbish. As you can't quantify any grounds for objection my point

> > holds true.....

> > People can see your lies about not setting follow-ups to

> > alt.test, proven liar tholen......
> > Prove it, proven liar tholen.....
> > Gutless response, coward tholen.....
> > Repetitive and gutless response, unoriginal coward tholen.....

Hardly a surprise that you had no reasoned response to any of my
points, David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

180> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

180> Hardly a surprise that you had no reasoned response to any of my
180> points, David.

Still suffering from attribution problems, dccxxvii? "David"
hasn't posted in this newsgroup since January.

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)
confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same
message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be
deleted.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> "dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

> > Hardly a surprise that you had no reasoned response to any of my

> > points, David.

> Still suffering from attribution problems, dccxxvii? "David"
> hasn't posted in this newsgroup since January.

Still posting from the account of David J Tholen, tholen? Still can't
tell the difference between a real name and an 'alias', tholen? Still
don't know who you are, David?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

186> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

186> Your message
186> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
186> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
186> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
186> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
186> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

186> Still posting from the account of David J Tholen, tholen? Still
can't
186> tell the difference between a real name and an 'alias', tholen?
Still
186> don't know who you are, David?

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

> > Still posting from the account of David J Tholen, tholen? Still

> > can't tell the difference between a real name and an 'alias',
> > tholen?

> > Still don't know who you are, David?

> [Nothing of relevence to the questions at all]

If you knew who you were you would be better able to post on topic,

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

196> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

196> Your message
196> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
196> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
196> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
196> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
196> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

196> If you knew who you were you would be better able to post on
topic,
196> David.

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> > If you knew who you were you would be better able to post on

> > topic, David.
>
> [Nothing of relevence to OS/2 or the statement.]

Sheesh, runing out of answer, tholen? Why do you post to an OS/2 group,
tholen?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

204> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

204> Your message
204> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
204> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
204> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
204> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
204> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

204> Sheesh, runing out of answer, tholen? Why do you post to an OS/2
group,
204> tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii, along with irony. Why do you
post to an OS/2 group, dccxxvii?

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> > Sheesh, runing out of answer, tholen? Why do you post to an OS/2

> > group, tholen?

> More classic.... irony.

Your sense of irony is not the subject of this newsgroup, tholen.

> Why do you post to an OS/2 group, dccxxvii?

I've asked you that without reply, nor will you say why you post off
topic questions to alt.astronomy, alt.suicide.holiday, alt.sewing,
alt.demon.local, alt.calahans, alt.religion.wicca, alt.atheism,
alt.magick and many other groups, and refuse to trim headers when
requested to do so.

If you had had the manners to trim headers when I asked you to I
wouldn't be here at all. Your knee jerk reactions are quite amusing.

As I've said before, it gives me something to do between hands of poker.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

217> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

217> Your message
217> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
217> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
217> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
217> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
217> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

217> Your sense of irony is not the subject of this newsgroup, tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

217> I've asked you that without reply, nor will you say why you post
off
217> topic questions to alt.astronomy, alt.suicide.holiday,
alt.sewing,
217> alt.demon.local, alt.calahans, alt.religion.wicca, alt.atheism,
217> alt.magick and many other groups, and refuse to trim headers when
217> requested to do so.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

217> If you had had the manners to trim headers when I asked you to I
217> wouldn't be here at all. Your knee jerk reactions are quite
amusing.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

217> As I've said before, it gives me something to do between hands of
poker.

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**> Your sense of irony is not the subject of this newsgroup, tholen.

**> If you had had the manners to trim headers when I asked you to I
**> wouldn't be here at all. Your knee jerk reactions are quite
**> amusing.

** [knee-jerk reaction]

They're unoriginal, though.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

239> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

239> Your message
239> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
239> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
239> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
239> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
239> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

239> ** [knee-jerk reaction]

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

239> They're unoriginal, though.

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**>> [knee-jerk reaction]

**> They're unoriginal, though.

** More [knee-jerk reaction]

What does your knee-jerk reaction have to do with OS/2, tholen?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

243> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

243> Your message
243> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
243> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
243> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
243> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
243> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

243> ** More [knee-jerk reaction]

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

243> What does your knee-jerk reaction have to do with OS/2, tholen?

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**>> More [knee-jerk reaction]

**> What does your knee-jerk reaction have to do with OS/2, tholen?

** Nothing

Ok, if it has nothing to do with OS/2 and you quibble about any
off-topic posting, why did you post it?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

254> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

254> Your message
254> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
254> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
254> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
254> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
254> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

254> ** Nothing

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

254> Ok, if it has nothing to do with OS/2 and you quibble about any
254> off-topic posting, why did you post it?

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**> Ok, if it has nothing to do with OS/2 and you quibble about any
**> off-topic posting, why did you post it?

** [Evasion]

Why do you ask people what relevance their posts have to do with OS/2
when you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without asking,

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

259> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

259> Your message
259> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
259> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
259> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
259> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
259> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

259> ** [Evasion]

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

259> Why do you ask people what relevance their posts have to do with
OS/2
259> when you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

259> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
asking,
259> tholen?

[dccxxvii]

Your message (Message-ID:
<83a0bcca-c830-46f1...@q9g2000pbo.googlegroups.com>)

confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to

others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The same

message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts

relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will also be

deleted.

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

** [More Evasion]

Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when you

have no interest in the answer, tholen?

Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without asking,

tholen?

Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to tholen?


--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

272> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

272> Your message
272> confirmed that you are a hypocrite, so all references you make to
272> others being hypocrites will be removed from your replies. The
same
272> message confirms that you do not answer questions as to a posts
272> relevance to OS/2 so any questions of yours of this nature will
also be
272> deleted.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

272> ** [More Evasion]

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

272> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
you
272> have no interest in the answer, tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

272> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
asking,
272> tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

272> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to tholen?

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> [Nothing of relevance to OS/2 advocacy]

Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when you

have no interest in the answer, tholen?

Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without asking,

tholen?

Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

284> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

284> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
you
284> have no interest in the answer, tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

284> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
asking,
284> tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

284> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
**> you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

** Dunno.

Oh dear.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

293> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

293> ** Dunno.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

293> Oh dear.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

**>> Dunno.

**> Oh dear.

** More

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear....

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

303> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

303> ** More

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

303> Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear....

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

#>> More

#> Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear....

# More.

I think you've had enough.

---
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

308> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

308> # More.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

308> I think you've had enough.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

#> # More.

#> I think you've had enough.

# Hic.

Time the bartender cut you off.

========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

315> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

315> # Hic.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

315> Time the bartender cut you off.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

"I think you've had enough."

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

#> # Hic.

#> Time the bartender cut you off.

# "I think you've had enough."
# --dccxxvii

Yes, so I said.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

324> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

324> # "I think you've had enough."
324> # --dccxxvii

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

324> Yes, so I said.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

"I think you've had enough."

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> [Nothing of relevance to OS/2 advocacy]

Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when you

have no interest in the answer, tholen?

Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without asking,

tholen?

Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

332> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

332> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
you
332> have no interest in the answer, tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

332> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
asking,
332> tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

332> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

[dccxxvii]

tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu wrote:

> [Nothing of relevance to OS/2 advocacy]

Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when you

have no interest in the answer, tholen?

Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without asking,

tholen?

Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

342> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

342> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
you
342> have no interest in the answer, tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

342> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
asking,
342> tholen?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

342> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

#> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
#> you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

# hypocrisy

That's right. You're a hypocrite.

#> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
#> asking, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

#> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No, it's because you're a troll, David.


--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

365> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

365> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

365> That's right. You're a hypocrite.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

365> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

365> No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

365> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

365> No, it's because you're a troll, David.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:


#> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
#> you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

# hypocrisy

That's right. You're a hypocrite.

#> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
#> asking, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

#> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No, it's because you're a troll, David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

372> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

372> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

372> That's right. You're a hypocrite.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

372> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

372> No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

372> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

372> No, it's because you're a troll, David.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:


#> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
#> you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

# hypocrisy

That's right. You're a hypocrite.

#> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
#> asking, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

#> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No, it's because you're a troll, David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

387> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

387> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

387> That's right. You're a hypocrite.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

387> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

387> No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

387> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

387> No, it's because you're a troll, David.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:


#> Why do you ask people what their posts have to do with OS/2 when
#> you have no interest in the answer, tholen?

# hypocrisy

That's right. You're a hypocrite.

#> Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without
#> asking, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

#> Why won't you remove cross-posts when requested to, tholen?

# hypocrisy

No, it's because you're a troll, David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

400> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

400> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

400> That's right. You're a hypocrite.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

400> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

400> No. This time it's your stupidity, tholen.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

400> # hypocrisy

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

400> No, it's because you're a troll, David.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

> "I think you've had enough."
> --dccxxvii

Your premature senility is showing, David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

417> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

417> Your premature senility is showing, David.

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

"I think you've had enough."
--dccxxvii

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

> "Why can't you tell whether posts are relevant to OS/2 without

> asking, tholen?."
> --dccxxvii

Don't just quote it, answer it.


--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

429> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

429> Don't just quote it, answer it.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

>> Don't just quote it, answer it.

> I'm scared to, dccxxvii.

Be brave David.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

436> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

436> Be brave David.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

>More classic

>More classic

What does your autism have to do with OS/2, David?

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

>> Be brave David.

> I'm a coward, dccxxvii.

You're pathetic.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

438> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

438> What does your autism have to do with OS/2, David?

"[Nothing of relevence to OS/2 *advocacy* ....]"
--dccxxvii

More classic hypocrisy from dccxxvii.

439> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

439> You're pathetic.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

>> What does your autism have to do with OS/2, David?

>> You're pathetic.

> You're right, dccxxvii.

I know.

--
========
dccxxvii
========

[tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu]

"dccxxvii" <the.impe...@gmail.com> writes:

448> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

448> I know.

[dccxxvii]

tholen ( tho...@ifa.hawaii.edu ) wrote to comp.os.os2.advocacy:

> "Describe in single words only the good things that come into your
> mind about... your mother."
> --dccxxvii

> DON'T TALK ABOUT MY MOTHER!!

I said only the good things, David.


--
========
dccxxvii
========