Kook's digest, volume 2452854

dizzy

unread,

Aug 4, 2003, 10:33:20 PM8/4/03

to

On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:52:47 GMT, tho...@antispam.ham wrote:

>dizzy writes:
>
>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Answer my questions first, tholen.

Note: No response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>435> How ironic.

Note: No response.

>436> Kook.

Note: No response.

>436> 47 antagonists. My my.
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with astronomy, dizzy?

About as much as yours does, kook.

tho...@antispam.ham

unread,

Aug 5, 2003, 1:59:39 PM8/5/03

to

dizzy writes:

437> Note: Still no response.

437> Note: No response.

437> Note: Still no response.

437> Note: No response.

437> About as much as yours does, kook.

438> How many volumes does it speak about YOU tholen, that you posted
438> "Note: Still no response" HUNDREDS OF TIMES in the SAME THREAD and
438> referring to the SAME QUESTION?

438> Kook.

439> I'd like to hear more about tholen's allegedly fraudulent research.

439> He is a kook, you know.

440> Don't you know that you're a kook, tholen?

441> Note: Still no response.

441> Note: No response.

441> Note: Still no response.

441> Note: No response.

441> About as much as yours does, kook.

What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

dizzy

unread,

Feb 26, 2018, 9:30:05 PM2/26/18

to

tholen tholed:

>dizzy writes:
>
>437> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.
>
Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.
>
Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.
>
Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>437> About as much as yours does, kook.

Note: No response.

>438> How many volumes does it speak about YOU tholen, that you posted
>438> "Note: Still no response" HUNDREDS OF TIMES in the SAME THREAD and
>438> referring to the SAME QUESTION?

Note: No response.

>438> Kook.

Note: No response.

>439> I'd like to hear more about tholen's allegedly fraudulent research.

Note: No response.

>439> He is a kook, you know.

Note: No response.

>440> Don't you know that you're a kook, tholen?

Note: No response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: Still no response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> Note: No response.

Note: Still no response.

>441> About as much as yours does, kook.
>
>What does your ongoing antagonism have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

Are you using OS/2 much, these days, tholen?

tholen

unread,

Feb 27, 2018, 1:49:24 AM2/27/18

to

On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 20:30:04 -0600, dizzy wrote:

1850> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

1850> tholen tholed:

What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?

1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: No response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.
1850> Note: Still no response.

What do your notes have to do with OS/2, dizzy?

1850> Are you using OS/2 much, these days, tholen?

I use OS/2 every day, dizzy. Everyone should, dizzy.

dizzy

unread,

Mar 9, 2018, 10:13:44 PM3/9/18

to

tholen tholed:

> dizzy wrote:
>
>1850> Are you using OS/2 much, these days, tholen?
>
>I use OS/2 every day, dizzy. Everyone should, dizzy.

OS/2 may have the best astrology software, for you, tholen, but most
people don't believe in that stuff.

tholen

unread,

Mar 9, 2018, 10:36:00 PM3/9/18

to

On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 21:13:34 -0600, dizzy wrote:

1852> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

1852> tholen tholed:

What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?

1852> OS/2 may have the best astrology software, for you, tholen, but most
1852> people don't believe in that stuff.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

dizzy

unread,

Mar 11, 2018, 10:23:50 PM3/11/18

to

tholen tholed:

> dizzy wrote:
>
>1852> OS/2 may have the best astrology software, for you, tholen, but most
>1852> people don't believe in that stuff.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

If OS/2 doesn't have the best astrology software, why do you use it,
tholen?

tholen

unread,

Mar 11, 2018, 11:18:47 PM3/11/18

to

On Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:23:48 -0500, dizzy wrote:

1853> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy

1853> tholen tholed:

What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?

1853> If OS/2 doesn't have the best astrology software, why do you use it,
1853> tholen?

I use it for many reasons, dizzy, which you would know by now if you had
better reading comprehension skills.