Re: Art examines his bung hole.
Art Deco
>"John "C"" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>news:wcGdnTqYwoWjQbnb...@centurytel.net...
>>
>> "Art Deco" <er...@caballista.org> wrote in message
>> news:170420070825496294%er...@caballista.org...
>>> www.freedomtofascism.com <tr...@r.us> wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:07:55 -0500, "John \"C\""
>> <hones...@centurytel.net>
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> ><snip>
>>> >
>>> >All r your base belong to us.
>>> >
>>> >Pg. 202-203, _Oblivion_, T. E. Bearden
>>>
>>> Bearden's a kook, and the inspiration for Richard CEEE Hoagland.
>>> >
>>> >Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa
>>> >Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa
>>> >Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa
>>> >Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa
>>> >Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa Alexa
>>> >A
>>>
>>> Behold Alexa's 5,300-line meltdown.
>>>
>> You snipped all the good stuff, Pedo Deco.
>>
>> You can run but you can't hide!
>>
>> http://www.cartoonstock.com/lowres/mka0047l.jpg
>
>
>Wow, I like it ... a DecoDuck inspecting its brain.
Why are you so stupid?
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen
"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> Hagar <ha...@sahm.name> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Wow, I like it ... a DecoDuck inspecting its brain.
>
> Why are you so stupid?
Practice.
--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within. Coffee boy to the
rich and famous. Proud owner of the Mop Jockey.
COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).
John "C"
"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineasp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-6...@news.octanews.com...
> In article <180420071116126994%er...@caballista.org>,
> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>
> > Hagar <ha...@sahm.name> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >Wow, I like it ... a DecoDuck inspecting its brain.
> >
> > Why are you so stupid?
>
>
> Practice.
>
HJ
Art Deco
>In article <dca3f$4625b998$46e3a683$32...@COMTECK.COM>,
> nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
>> nightbat
>>
>> Never mind Bearden for now with the discovered cold energy of
>> the nightbat the World will never be the same.
>
>
>BWAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHHAHA
Another saucerhead claim, without any evidence as usual.
John "C"
> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineasp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <dca3f$4625b998$46e3a683$32...@COMTECK.COM>,
> > nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> >
> >> nightbat
> >>
> >> Never mind Bearden for now with the discovered cold energy of
> >> the nightbat the World will never be the same.
> >
> >
> >BWAHAHHAHAHHAAHAHHAHAHHAHA
>
> Another saucerhead claim, without any evidence as usual.
>
HJ
Hagar
"Meat Plow" <me...@meatplow.local> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.04.18....@nntp.sun-meatplow.local...
Yet another illusions of grandeur sufferer coming to the aid of the demented
Duck Flock ...
Art Deco
I'd say your campaign for the Busted Urinal is going quite well,
hypocrite.
tho...@antispam.ham
10350> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10350> Another saucerhead claim, without any evidence as usual.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10351> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10351> Good boy, you get a biscuit from little napoleon.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10352> Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.astro.amateur,sci.space.history,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10352> Translation: no one replied to Guth's latest kookscreed.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10353> Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10353> Translation: Brad can't answer the question about where "salt" sits on
10353> the periodic table.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10354> Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10354> Sodium isn't "salt", kook. Do a search on "I-VII ionic salts".
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10355> Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10355> Still confusing sodium with "salt", Brad?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10356> Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10356> Still replying to yourself in desperation?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10357> Newsgroups: sci.space.history,sci.astro,sci.physics,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10357> What lies, Brad? Be specific?
10357> You don't understand physics.
10357> PKB.
10357> Kookfroth.
10357> Learn what "stalking" means, idiot.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10358> Newsgroups: sci.astro,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks
10358> Got "salt", Guth?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10359> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10359> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm), <tho...@antispam.ham> tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
10359> [insert Davie's patented ding a ling lame here]
I see that you forgot to replace your placeholder with some imaginary
patent, Deco.
10359> Another hate list buried inside another multi-posted load of tholospam.
What was allegedly multi-posted, Deco? Still suffering from reading
comprehension problems, Deco?
10360> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10360> Hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahha
10360> Once again you demonstrate your profound ignorance of electricity and
10360> magnetism.
10360> So you claim, still without evidence.
10360> So?
10360> Which you have no evidence of.
10360> Another meaningless phrase you just made up.
10360> Wrong -- because he knows he can't argue them in a rational fashion.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10361> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10361> It is called "force", a vector quantity (magnitude and direction for
10361> the saucerhead-inclined readers). Gravity manifests itself as a force,
10361> the nuclear forces manifest themselves as forces, EM fields manifest
10361> themselves as forces.
10361> You might understand if you knew any frosh-level physics.
10361> [remainder flushed, unread]
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10362> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10362> Coward and liar -- still kookdancing.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10363> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10363> Do you talk like this at family reunions, Brad?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10364> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.israel,alt.terrorism.world-trade-center,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10364> Note that Brad is unable to refute anything I wrote.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10365> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks
10365> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm), <tho...@antispam.ham> tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
10365> Still can't help yourself from including my name in your obsession with
10365> Joe Malloy, Davie?
Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
10366> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks
10366> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm), <tho...@antispam.ham> tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
10366> Today's 1,700+ line screed from the IKYABWAI King is in:
I'm well aware that your screed is in, Deco. No need to tell me about
it.
10366> You're missing quite a bunch, Davie, best get busy froup counting again.
Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
10366> Obsession noted, Davie.
Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
10366> Obsession noted, Davie.
Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
10366> What do your obsessive poast counting and digests have to do with OS/2,
10366> Davie?
Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
10367> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10367> greysky is one of the saucerheads, which has rules about calling fellow
10367> saucerheads on the nonsense they may post. He is usually quite silent,
10367> but has been out in the open this week.
10367> He claims:
10367> * It is possible to build a faster-than-light speed radio with quantum
10367> entanglement, and has a web page about this great discovery:
10367> * That those who use math are "beancounters"
10367> * To hold a degree in physics
10367> * To regularly go up into the Calif. Sierra Mtns. to test his FTL radio
10367> * That antimatter produces "negative gravity"
10367> * That the the universe is a "giant information transfer machine"
10367> * That his ideas will revolutionize physics, but no one will pony up
10367> the megacash needed to test them
10367> Note that the web page has lots of words, but little substance.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10368> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10368> "Civility" was the word he using with regularity.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10369> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10369> What you feel or think about being refuted is irrelevant. Your
10369> philosophical world-view is based entirely on one postulate:
10369> Because the Painius Postulate is correct, there must be a pump to push
10369> this stuff around. Nevermind that there is exactly zero evidence for
10369> this pump.
10369> Unable to give rational answers, you have to resort to attacking the
10369> messenger.
10369> You've been told many times that gravitons are not part of General
10369> Relativity, yet you continue to employ this straw man.
10369> AKA the Painius Postulate.
10369> I think it is safe to predict that physics will withstand the
10369> challenges of philosophical physics and the Painius Postulate.
10369> I also predict yet another diatribe about Einstein's appendix.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10370> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10370> In other words, it's just some cool sounding stuff you made up.
10370> Idiocy.
10370> Wrong. Completely wrong. Do educate yourself on blackbody radiation
10370> and spectral irradiance.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10371> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10371> Correct.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10372> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10372> How they are able to convince themselves of these multiple instances of
10372> complete and utter nonsense is quite beyond me.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10373> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10373> You've reached the next level of lame. Well done, gay lamer.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10374> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10374> Yep. He conveniently ignored all the extra blather about "wave
10374> pressure" and his solar radiometer.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10375> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10375> He will stick to the Painius Postulate despite any and all attempts to
10375> push clues in his direction.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10376> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10376> You forgot to include "Everyone is Bowtie" in this post. HTH
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10377> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10377> Oh, like the saucerheads.
10377> Hahahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10378> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10378> Shuttup, Chung.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10379> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10379> Shuttup, Protobrain.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10380> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10380> Quiet, ko0k.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10381> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10381> Quiet, ko0k.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10382> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10382> He lives for the positive reinforcement from Clockbrain.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10383> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10383> Learn to post and quote, saucerhead.
10383> Only in your ignorant FSN-stricken mind.
10383> [same old Painius Postulate word salad flushed, unread]
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10384> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10384> Continued sockpuppet delusion noted.
10384> Oh not this nonsense again.
10384> Give it up.
10384> So you claim, as an uneducated philosopher.
10384> How does that shoe taste? It's in there pretty far, it's gotta be hard
10384> to breathe.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10385> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10385> *ding* <tips sombrero>
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10386> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,alt.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy.art-deco
10386> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHTY FROUP COUNT!!1!
10386> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHT POAST COUNT!!!!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10387> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks
10387> Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm), <tho...@antispam.ham> tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
10387> Why are you such a disingenuous weasel, tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
10387> Your cute little word games are so lame.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
10387> More spam.
I'm well aware that you posted more spam, Deco. No need to tell me
about it.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10388> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10388> It is an intrinsic property of mass. Why or how? Who knows. This is
10388> like asking "why does the universe exist?", "what existed before the
10388> initial expansion of the universe?", or "why is the value of the unit
10388> charge on an electron what it is?" There is simply no way to answer.
10388> Gravitational force is a vector field, they add. For non-uniform
10388> masses, the gravitational effect is calculated by integration, a
10388> mathematical operation first written down by Newton.
10388> Although the magnitudes of nuclear forces are orders of magnitude
10388> stronger than gravity, the range of their effects is quite small.
10388> Gravity, OTOH, has effects over galactic distances. You are confusing
10388> range with magnitude.
10388> This is all stuff that is taught in undergraduate physics courses.
10388> But I doubt you will accept them because they contradict your
10388> preconceived ideas.
10388> painsnuh lames noted.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10389> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10389> You fail to understand that the claims and ideas about fluid space are
10389> yours, therefore it is up to you to demonstrate how they describe
10389> physical effects better than current theory. I (with the help of
10389> others) have made an extensive list of problems that adopting fluid
10389> space raises, and your response to these was:
10389> "not by anyone whose opinion i respect. It shouldn't surprise you that
10389> you've done little to help your credibility in my mind. Nor were any of
10389> the so-called refutations to my satisfaction, objectively speaking.
10389> Thus far, you have said nothing that would change the facts..."
10389> You don't understand very basic physics, yet you reject 500 years of
10389> thought that is backed by careful experimentation and observation.
10389> Instead you assert that fluid space is factual, without any experiment
10389> or observation, and reject anything that disagrees with that assertion.
10389> For example, I could make the assertion that the inside every electron
10389> is filled with lots and lots of little orange spheres. It is then up
10389> to me to show how this assertion is true, or at least supported by some
10389> kind of observation. Do you understand? There is an old saying:
10389> "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
10389> Einstein's extraordinary claim that intense gravity fields could bend
10389> light were not accepted until there was concrete evidence that it was
10389> true.
10389> I'll try once more: fluid space claims that gravity is the result of
10389> some kind of stuff rushing in toward a mass. Thus a rock is held to
10389> the ground by the stuff moving into the mass of the Earth. What this
10389> model doesn't not explain is there is lots and lots of physical
10389> evidence, such as planetary orbital observations, that demonstrate that
10389> two masses are actually attracted to each other (Kepler, Newton, etc.).
10389> You have to demonstrate how fluid moving in toward one mass is also
10389> able to apply force to a second mass located considerable distance from
10389> the first mass toward each other. This is the mutual attraction
10389> problem that you have not provided any answer for, not even a word
10389> description.
10389> Instead, you have offered stuff like this:
10389> "You're fulla crap, as always, Mother. You could not esplain your way
10389> out of a paper bag."
10389> When asked about how the fluid makes a circuit, you made up some highly
10389> dubious notion about a "fluid pump" somehow connected to the "toroidal
10389> universe". This is an extraordinary claim, and requires extraordinary
10389> evidence. Just proposing its existence is not enough.
10389> If you do not consider this a refutation, then you are truly
10389> uneducable. You really, really, really need to learn Newton's laws of
10389> motion before trying to replace them with something else. But I fear
10389> this advice will fall on ears that are solidly plugged.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10390> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10390> Using Clockbrain to support your theories is certainly not going to
10390> help your cause.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10391> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10391> Can this "medium" be polarized?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10392> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10392> Quiet, ko0k.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10393> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10393> Quiet, ko0k.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10394> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10394> Shuttup, Chung.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10395> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10395> Shuttup, Protobrain.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10396> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,alt.2600,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.hackers.malicious,alt.homosexuality,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10396> Yup.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10397> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10397> An extraordinary claim which you have no evidence of.
10397> You just contradicted yourself.
10397> Why is that?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10398> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10398> Looks like you can add your name to the list of those who need to bone
10398> up on black body radiation and spectroscopy.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10399> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10399> Postulated (and assumed to by true) only by the inhabitants of
10399> alt.astronomy.
10399> In other words, you are unable to explain it.
10399> So you believe.
10399> Of course it does. This mystical view of the universe cannot explain
10399> orbital mechanics.
10399> Ach! Please, go learn Newton. These statements you make are so
10399> idiotic.
10399> If you any knowledge of Newton's laws of motion, you would know how
10399> silly this question is.
10399> v = dx/dt
10399> a = dv/dt
10399> Let me guess, you don't understand simple differentiation.
10399> The second part of the Painius Postulate is a refusal to consider that
10399> the first part is dead wrong.
10399> Keep pounding your head on that brick wall, it is bound to fail
10399> eventually.
10399> 'major flushage]
10399> Here, let me help:
10399> The facts about fluid space:
10399> 1) Has no observational evidence
10399> 2) Has no written theory, nor a mathematical framework
10399> 3) Makes no numerical predictions
10399> 4) Cannot show where the fluid starts
10399> 5) Cannot show how the fluid gets back to the start
10399> 6) Cannot explain how it interacts with ordinary matter
10399> 7) Cannot explain how it doesn't interact with ordinary matter
10399> 8) Produces a huge number of singularities
10399> 9) Cannot replicate known behavior for a spherical shell mass
10399> 10) Requires a container, the nature of which is unknown
10399> 11) Cannot explain how fluid is continually created as the
10399> universe expands
10399> 12) Almost exclusively references a single unknown, unpublished
10399> non-scientist named "Wolter"
10399> 13) Uses ill-defined terms such as "spatial energy" and "sub-Planck
10399> energy domain" (SPUD)
10399> 14) Does not define a temperature of the fluid
10399> 15) Does not state if waves in the fluid can be polarized
10399> 16) Cannot explain the mutual attraction between two masses
10399> 17) No explanation for why fluid space ideas are not a rehash of
10399> Le Sage-type theories of gravity (i.e using push forces)
10399> 18) No explanation of how the presence of mass alters the "flow"
10399> of the "fluid".
10399> 19) Cannot explain the photoelectric effect (claims photons do
10399> not exist).
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10400> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10400> Answering a question with a question, typical.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10401> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10401> Feeling lonely, Rick?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10402> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10402> ....The Painius Postulate.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10403> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10403> Learn the equations that describe how the magnitude of the forces vary
10403> with distance before making silly statement such as this one.
10403> The Painius Postulate once again is put in play.
10403> Integration. Gravity is a force, not "energy". You do know what a
10403> force is?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10404> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10404> alt.astronomy is the place for you, Brad; just like the saucerheads,
10404> you refuse to consider that your goofy notions are dead wrong.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10405> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10405> Nonsense.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10406> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10406> So speaketh the non-scientist who doesn't even understand Newton's law
10406> of motion.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10407> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10407> Yet he keeps ranting about the magnitude of forces.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10408> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10408> <boggle>
10408> He doesn't even know what a force is.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10409> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10409> My pity for your ignorant, uneducated cluelessness was especially
10409> strong today.
10409> I can see my attempts at education were vain.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10410> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10410> Without any consistency from day-to-day.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10411> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10411> Brad for Kooki Information Minister?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10412> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.usenet.kooks
10412> His obsessions and word games know no bounds.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10413> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10413> Hahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhahahahah
10413> You mean the "science officers" who don't understand Newtonia physics?
10413> And you are such a coward that you let your Pit Yorkie do all your
10413> laming in your place.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10414> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10414> How ironic, from a pair of silly persons who don't even understand
10414> Newton.
10414> Translation: Double-A adheres to the Painius Postulate.
10414> More irony, from the non-scientist who refuses to learn the subjects
10414> that he yaps about.
10414> Hahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahhahahaahh
10414> Note the laughter above.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10415> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10415> Isn't it time to give your Pit Yorkie his daily biscuit?
10415> Which all of you lack.
10415> Translation: "They don't accept the Painius Postulate!"
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10416> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10416> Unable to answer the problems with the Painius Postulate, Double-A the
10416> hypocrite and coward is forced to attack the messenger.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10417> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10417> So what led you to reject 500 years of rational thought?
10417> After admitting that you know nothing of physics...
10417> You then proceed to pontificate on a subject that requires a great deal
10417> of knowledge. Typical saucerhead behavior.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10418> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10418> He refuses to learn even Newtonian mechanics.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10419> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10419> Which has nothing to do with your ideas about a mythical SPUD.
10419> You are grasping at invisible straws that you don't understand.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10420> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10420> A fact that is in complete disagreement of greysky's "antimatter
10420> produces negative gravity" nonsense.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10421> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10421> Just like the mythical "fluid pump".
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10422> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10422> Prediction: quoting Painius with another rant about
10422> "pressure/density/temperature", SPUD, and "Wolter".
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10423> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10423> Problem solved.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10424> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10424> With transparently bad sockpuppets.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10425> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10425> OK then. For his steadfast adherence to his notion that a "Sirius C"
10425> exists despite all attempts to educate him (ditto for his moon hoax
10425> rants), I nominate Brad Guth for the Kooki Information Minister.
10425> Seconds?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10426> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10426> I wrote a quite long post which did just this, and you ignored it:
10426> "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence."
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10427> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10427> Oh the irony.
10427> What about Painius' goose lames, hypocrite? What about your little Pit
10427> Yorkie?
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10428> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10428> I think he's too clueless to understand the problem.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10429> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10429> The "lines of flow" certainly wouldn't form as they might for a point
10429> mass.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10430> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10430> You forgot to whine about the "malware/spermware" sent into your
10430> computer via usenet from those "MI/NSA" agents who laugh at your
10430> idiotic nonsense, Brad.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10431> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10431> Prediction confirmed.
10432> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10432> There is another physical reality that just occurred to me that FSN
10432> cannot explain -- bending of light in high gravitational fields. How
10432> can this fluid that pushes matter toward a mass affect light at all?
10432> This one looks like a death trap for the Painius Postulate; they claim
10432> there is a magic wavelength crossover between wave and particle
10432> behavior for photons, yet both are affected by gravitational fields.
10432> If they claim that photons are waves of the fluid (the polarization
10432> question notwithstanding), then long wavelength should be unaffected.
10432> If they claim both are bent, then they are tacitly admitting that
10432> spacetime is curved, which is anathema to the FSN.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
10433> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10433> I'd say your campaign for the Busted Urinal is going quite well,
10433> hypocrite.
10434> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
10434> Careful, the Pit Yorkie is likely to bite your hand.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
Another day, another 85 articles from Art Deco cross-posted to irrelevant
newsgroups.
I see that you completely evaded the matter of your cross-posting to
irrelevant newsgroups, Deco. No surprise there, really.
What does your ongoing "kookdance" have to do with those newsgroups,
Deco? Not that I'm really expecting an answer from you, Deco.
"I don't read dictionaries, tholen."
--Art Deco
No wonder you misuse and misspell so many words, Deco, but it's up to
you if you want to look like a fool.
"Why do you keep spamming this quote over and over, Tholen?
I did not write it."
--Art Deco
Further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given
that I clearly stated that I never said that you wrote the quote.
Rather, I said that Art Deco wrote the quote, Deco, and that's because
Art Deco did write the quote, as evidenced by the message ID that I
provided the first time you made the accusation.
"Or perhaps your pathetic Holy Digestor FORTRAN code can't handle a
five-digit total?"
--Art Deco
Further evidence of your counting problem, Deco, given that your posting
total hadn't reached five digits at the time of your question. Also
further evidence of your reading comprehension problem, Deco, given that
the combined total from all posters was correctly reported to five digits
over three years ago.
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali
"I don't need a memory"
--Art Deco
Don't bother auditioning for "The Wizard of Oz", Deco.
"To which newsgroups have I followed you around?"
--Art Deco
"I monitor your personal sandbox"
--Art Deco
Having trouble remembering to which newsgroups you've followed me,
Deco? Oh that's right. You don't need a memory.
"[massive sneckage]"
--Art Deco
"You removed the context"
--Art Deco
Classic hypocrisy.
"99.9% of the traffic in cooa consists of your digests and
people replying to them"
--Art Deco
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Rather, most of the
traffic in cooa consists of people responding to you, Deco, after
you've added the newsgroup to the distribution, and then the ongoing
follow-up to those articles. In other words, you're responsible for
most of the traffic in cooa, Deco.
"...which have nothing to do with the topic of the groups you
multi-post them into."
--Art Deco, cross-poster to irrelevant newsgroups such as
24hoursupport.helpdesk aus.science
alt.2600 cam.misc
alt.alien.research comp.lang.fortran
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk comp.os.linux.advocacy
alt.alien.visitors comp.os.os2.advocacy
alt.antichristnet comp.os.os2.apps
alt.aratzio comp.os.os2.misc
alt.astronomy comp.sys.mac
alt.astronomy.art-deco demon.local
alt.atheism gac.physics.astronomy
alt.bad.clams ne.weather
alt.bible.prophecy news.groups
alt.buzzard.rules rec.arts.marching.drumcorps
alt.cascade rec.arts.movies.current-films
alt.christnet.christianlife rec.arts.poems
alt.christnet.prayer rec.arts.sf.written
alt.conspriacy rec.aviation.products
alt.culture.alaska rec.music.classical
alt.fan.art-bell rec.org.mensa
alt.fan.letter.m rec.sports.basketball.college
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh rec.sports.football.college
alt.fan.steveleyland rec.woodworking
alt.flame sci.archaeology
alt.fucknozzles sci.astro
alt.gothic sci.electronics.basics
alt.hackers.malicious sci.electronics.design
alt.languages.french sci.geo.earthquakes
alt.messianic sci.geo.geology
alt.music.michael-jackson sci.math
alt.os.windows-xp sci.med.cardiology
alt.paranet.ufo sci.philosophy.tech
alt.paranormal.crop-circles sci.physics
alt.psychology.help sci.psychology.psychotherapy
alt.religion.christian sci.skeptic
alt.revisionism sci.space.history
alt.satellite.tv.europe sci.space.policy
alt.sci.physics.new-theories soc.culture.israel
alt.snuh soc.culture.jewish
alt.society.liberalism soc.men
alt.spirituality.radical-faerie soc.singles
alt.usage.english soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm
alt.usenet.kooks talk.politics.misc
alt.wee.davey.mom-a-fat-whore triangle.general
aus.general uk.media.radio.bbc-r4
aus.invest uk.sci.astronomy
================================================================================
Phil Kyle writes:
618> Newsgroups: rec.music.classical,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.astronomy,demon.local,alt.fan.steveleyland,alt.astronomy.art-deco
618> ALL HAEL TEH MIGHTY FROUP COUNT!!1!
618> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
618> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
619> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
619> Shuttup, Protobrain.
619> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
619> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
620> Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,alt.2600,alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk,alt.hackers.malicious,alt.homosexuality,demon.local,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
620> Yup.
620> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
620> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
621> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
621> Shuttup, Protobrain.
621> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
621> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
622> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
622> Shuttup, Protobrain.
622> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
622> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
623> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
623> Shuttup, Protobrain.
623> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
623> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
624> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
624> Shuttup, Protobrain.
624> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
624> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
625> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
625> Shuttup, Protobrain.
625> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
625> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
626> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
626> Shuttup, Protobrain.
626> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
626> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
627> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
627> Shuttup, Protobrain.
627> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
627> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
628> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
628> Shuttup, Protobrain.
628> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
628> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
629> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
629> Shuttup, Protobrain.
629> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
629> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
630> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
630> Shuttup, Protobrain.
630> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
630> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
631> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
631> Shuttup, Protobrain.
631> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
631> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
632> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
632> Shuttup, Protobrain.
632> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
632> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
633> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
633> Shuttup, Protobrain.
633> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
633> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
634> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
634> Shuttup, Protobrain.
634> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
634> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
635> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
635> Shuttup, Protobrain.
635> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
635> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
636> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
636> Shuttup, Chung.
636> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
636> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
637> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
637> Shuttup, Chung.
637> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
637> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
638> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
638> Shuttup, Chung.
638> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
638> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
639> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
639> Shuttup, Chung.
639> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
639> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
640> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
640> Shuttup, Chung.
640> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
640> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
641> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
641> Shuttup, Chung.
641> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
641> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
642> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
642> Shuttup, Chung.
642> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
642> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
643> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
643> Shuttup, Chung.
643> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
643> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
644> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
644> Shuttup, Chung.
644> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
644> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
645> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
645> Shuttup, Chung.
645> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
645> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
646> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
646> Quiet, ko0k
646> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
646> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
647> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
647> Quiet, ko0k
647> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
647> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
648> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
648> Quiet, ko0k
648> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
648> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
649> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
649> Quiet, ko0k
649> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
649> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
650> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
650> Quiet, ko0k
650> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
650> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
651> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
651> Quiet, ko0k
651> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
651> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
652> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
652> Quiet, ko0k
652> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
652> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
653> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
653> Quiet, ko0k
653> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
653> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
654> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
654> Quiet, ko0k
654> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
654> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
655> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
655> Quiet, ko0k
655> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
655> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
656> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
656> Quiet, ko0k
656> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
656> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
657> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
657> Quiet, ko0k
657> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
657> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
658> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
658> Quiet, ko0k
658> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
658> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
659> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
659> Quiet, ko0k
659> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
659> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
660> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
660> Quiet, ko0k
660> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
660> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
661> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
661> Quiet, ko0k.
661> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
661> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
662> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
662> Quiet, ko0k
662> 1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
662> May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
What does that have to do with classical music, Kyle?
================================================================================
ah writes:
1228> Newsgroups: alt.satellite.tv.europe,alt.usage.english,demon.local,uk.media.radio.bbc-r4,aus.invest,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.alien.research,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1228> Quiet, ko0k.
1229> Newsgroups: alt.society.liberalism,talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.bad.clams,demon.local,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1229> Quiet, ko0k.
1230> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1230> Shuttup, Protobrain.
1231> Newsgroups: alt.atheism,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.christnet.prayer,sci.med.cardiology,demon.local,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1231> Shuttup, Chung.
1232> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1232> *snoopy dance*
Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email, ah. No surprise
there, really.
================================================================================
TheBookman writes:
125> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
125> Well, if you _want_ to get muddy, don't complain about it when you get
125> dirty.
125> So? For those who enjoy flaming, it's a reasonable course of action.
125> I wasn't talking to him. Butter helps the flavorings stick to the popcorn.
125> ESL!
125> WWFSMD?
What does that have to do with OS/2, TheBookman?
================================================================================
chatnoir writes:
14> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
14> According to the New York Times article with the headline below, Your
14> family and fiends er ah friends have dumped you for the nearest Chimp
14> - It is smarter and has a much more developed personality than you!
What does that have to do with OS/2, chatnoir?
================================================================================
Terrence Cooter writes:
17> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
17> (ENORMOUS SNIP OF LIONEL'S FAILED ATTEMP TO "TORMENT" RHONDA)
17> You're a whole lot crazier than 90% of the so called "kooks" you've been
17> harassing for all these years, Barney. Clearly you're obsessed with
17> Rhonda.
17> Here's a free clue. The nomination you made of Rhonda for COTM is still
17> not seconded. Why? Because she hasn't backed down to you. You'll blink
17> first, Lionel. Then you'll blame it on some nonexistent consulting
17> contract in Perth or Adelaide, but you aren't good enough to be in demand
17> in your field. Hell, you couldn't even post ONE ballot when Phoenix asked
17> you to be his successor, and that's why your name is not included in the
17> AUK list of wranglers....BECAUSE YOU FAILED at that bullshit task, yet you
17> expect people to believe that you're trusted to run corporate intranets?
17> LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
18> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
18> History tends to repeat itself.
What does that have to do with OS/2 or singles, Cooter?
================================================================================
The Demon Prince of Absurdity writes:
102> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
102> He was gaybashed a few years back. gayton's deformed head is still ringing.
103> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
103> Kangaroo c0ck sucker why would she care about that? Loonel get STDs
103> treated b1tches
103> Why do you whine whenever someone hurts yer mangina? Yous a b1tch
103> Nah. he's kicking yer as$ all over usenet and yer embarrassed about it,
103> looney loonel Lauer
103> Speaking of sucking,how does raginghomo's c0ck taste?
103> He's as$f*cked and mindf*cked you so badly, yer now just a blithering idiot.
103> He hurt yer mangina something awful, eh?
103> Whine whine whine
103> Kangaroos Slurper...
103> <Ah you know what that is>
104> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
104> we both know yer too f*cking stoopid to get the license. yer a crack
104> addicted street whore remember loonel
105> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
105> Loonel is a faygalla. he'll back down first.
106> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
106> Y'know, the appropriate venue for her rant is alt.callahans -- in the
106> Danger Room. She could get as nasty as she pleased, there, and no one
106> would flame her back. Instead, she's opted for the greater evil...;-
106> {P}
What does that have to do with OS/2, Demon? Interesting that Deco
hasn't said anything about your 160+ line signature.
================================================================================
dizzy writes:
1138> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1138> Well, they must be after you, then, kook.
1138> Dozens of posts per day!
What does that have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
================================================================================
John Fereira writes:
1> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> seconded.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Fereira?
================================================================================
Hagar writes:
36> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
36> Ohh, come on now, DickLess, get a grip ... better yet, let Duckie get a
36> grip, you can pay him back later, by ruffling his feathers.
37> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
37> Yet another illusions of grandeur sufferer coming to the aid of the demented
37> Duck Flock ...
38> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
38> HJ, do you understand what that idiot is babbling about ?? I really think
38> that Fart DickLess' relentless assaults on the Quack's pooper do show the
38> expected results ... drastic brain cell reduction and neuron calcification.
38> Coupled with his impulsive habit of flogging his Johnson, he should go over
38> the edge in no time. The big question is: what will Dickless do then ...
38> ahh, screw him.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Hagar?
================================================================================
honestjohn writes:
622> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.astronomy,comp.os.os2.advocacy
622> Art Deco's is the Biggest Coward on usenet!
622> He tries to "Run Away" all the time!
622> He killfiles anyone that might hurt his tender feelings!
622> Art was the skinny nerdy kid that everyone picked-on when he was in school
622> and it "Warped" his mind to strike-out at anyone that he can, which means
622> anyone on usenet since usenet is the only life that he has left in his
622> "twilight years".
622> Pity the Poor Pederast! (P.P.P.)
623> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
623> I know what Little Duckie is going to get from his "Life-partner" Deco!
624> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
624> Drop that dog-biscuit, dad.
625> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.paranet.ufo,sci.skeptic,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
625> Chill-out "Deep throat" Duckie!
626> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
626> "Bill's"....DUMBASS!
627> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.christian,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
627> Jealously noted.
627> Luckily gays don't reproduce, so you don't have any family left, you being
627> so Old.
627> Sorry...........................................NOT!
628> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
628> .......says Art Deco looking in the mirror.
629> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
629> Because he knows that you are the World's renown expert on "Short-Arm
629> Pressure Checks".
629> Keep Suckin' Deco
630> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
630> Oh Look, a Jackal (Art) nipping at the heels of the Great Man (Hagar), how
630> unusual.
631> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
631> How does PHP's dick taste? It's in there pretty far, it's gotta be hard to
631> breathe. So please take this opportunity to choke your Pedo ass to death.
632> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
632> Gay Pedophile Art Deco noted!
633> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
633> Because:
633> Colorado Carl (a.k.a. Art Deco) is an affront to basic human decency!
633> Death to Pederasts!
633> p.s. Collect a UV point on that, Pederast.
634> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
634> I never figured that a mother goose would "take-in" a baby duckling, would
634> you?
635> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
635> No Nazi talk, please!
635> Please, go learn some proper manners and basic human decency!
635> And your Heckling is intelligent?!?
635> Get a "grip", Deco!
636> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
636> Heckling decent folks? Typical for Nazi Deco.
637> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
637> Feeling lonely, Pedo Deco?
637> Where is your Gay Duck today?
638> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
638> I see that you have been trying to produce an egg with Art as the daddy!
639> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
639> Art IS a Lady-man. What a drag!
640> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
640> A GAY Duck calling someone fruity!?!
641> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
641> The Deco-Doofus ass!
641> Coming to a mirror near Art Deco.
642> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
642> level,
642> I would never have believed that you two faggots could form your own
642> "Daisy-Chain".
642> I've discovered you Duckie-Bois talent. Gay porn directors will be wanting
642> to contact you two.
643> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
643> Do you know what a faggot you are?
644> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
644> .....Art cruises the City Park looking for "Luv".
645> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.autos.mini,comp.os.os2.advocacy
645> Sniffing Methane can rot your brain, just look at Phineass T. Puddledrip
645> and his pal Fart Deco.
646> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
646> Hey, no name calling, you pecker sucker!
647> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
647> Dancing with the Ko0ks, brought to you by AUKers and Fart Deco.
648> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
648> or an
648> "We they will"???
648> wtf, <over>
What does that have to do with OS/2, honestjohn?
================================================================================
Kali writes:
83> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
83> <shakes head>
83> Lionel made you do it.
83> Rick made you do it.
83> AUK made you do it.
83> [...the inevitable train wreck]
What does that have to do with OS/2, Kali?
================================================================================
Crash Street Kidd writes:
5> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
5> Not the honey!
6> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
6> In comparison to some things, no. Soc.singles has always been
6> at least as tumultuous as AUK and that has been my newsgroup
6> almost from my first post.
6> Real life has always been more extreme than usenet.
7> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
7> Closer to impossible deniability.
7> The situation is unlikely to ever arise.
7> No. He hasn't. Its not like Steve is that hard to find.
7> Just some trolling. Sorry. I live in an automotive industry area. I
7> get
7> annoyed when people lie and those lies have significant consequences.
7> I am glad that we have federal politicians who refuse to live up to
7> the
7> insane commitments of a corrupt previous government. I would rather
7> see Canadian tax money stay in Canada than sent to Russia to
7> purchase pollution credits which do nothing to clean up the
7> environment
7> (which is the real problem).
7> A period of warming followed by a period of cooling followed by
7> a period of warming. I am sure that over a period of centuries
7> we will be able to find a way to adjust.
7> Exactly.
8> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
8> Are you channelling Borat?
8> I think Mike is 5 foot nine and Steve is maybe five foot ten.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Kidd?
================================================================================
Rhonda Lea Kirk writes:
100> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
100> soc.singles has a unique culture, because it seems to extend into real
100> life, much as my "home" newsgroup, rec.skydiving, did.
100> There was a lot of "real-lifing" going on there, but of an entirely
100> different sort.
100> Usenet is an aspect of real life. I sit, I read, I type.
100> In one way, it's a safe environment, because it allows people to test
100> out ideas they might not want to try in real life, but I don't see that
100> we come with a switch to turn off our emotions just because we're
100> sitting in front of a computer.
100> Even socks are nothing more than wearing apparel for people.
100> Picking on people with deficits is just...shitty.
100> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
100> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
101> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
101> Not /want/, exactly. More like not willing to run away to avoid virtual
101> mud.
101> It could be said that the reason I've already gotten muddy is because
101> I'm complaining.
101> It's not that I disapprove of flaming, generally. It's that I disapprove
101> of certain kinds of flaming.
101> For example (and please note that this is a different example than I had
101> in mind when I made the original post), Lionel has accused me of net
101> abuse and criminal activity (forgery). I want him to stop flaming and
101> take action to prove it.
101> Then, when he finds out how wrong he is, I want him to shut up about it.
101> I suspect that anyone in the position of being lied about probably feels
101> the same way. In some cases, it really doesn't matter, so defending
101> against such bs is an exercise. But some people really can't handle it,
101> and it's no wonder they go off the edge when it happens.
101> Well, maybe it's because I should be on a diet. ;)
101> <Mary Poppins>
101> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
101> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
102> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
102> Please do.
102> I think I've answered everything a hundred times, but what's one more,
102> especially when I have all those nice draft posts just sitting there
102> waiting to be sent.
102> Terrence Cooter? Porchy? Fitzroy Obsidian? Whom are you accusing?
102> I have no fucking idea who the forger is at this point, because you've
102> accused me of net abuse and criminal activity, so I know for certain
102> that your accusations are not to be trusted.
102> Show me proof, Lionel, because having accused me of heinous activities,
102> I have no faith in your assertions.
102> I haven't asked anyone to do anything for me. Not a single act, not a
102> single post.
102> I have been asked on occasion by polite people if it was okay to post
102> something--we had this discussion about a post Mike made, I believe--but
102> only in situations where the subject matter of the post is something
102> I've disclosed in email.
102> Less polite people post first and make useless apologies afterward.
102> "Figured him out."
102> Does he still have the brightdsl.net account?
102> I spent six months in auk playing the other side, Lionel.
102> Sometimes it pays to take a good hard look at oneself. <hint>
102> I know that someone (or several people) are forging emails and posts. I
102> haven't a clue now who it is, although I simply took it for granted
102> before that it was Bowtie. You still tell me it's Bowtie, but you also
102> tell me that I'm engaged in the same activities.
102> If you want, I'll give you whatever information you require to prove it
102> to yourself and a release authorizing you to do so. Have at it.
102> I don't approve of certain kinds of behavior, Lionel. That doesn't
102> change, no matter who is doing it.
102> Just because I am tolerant of my friends doesn't mean I like everything
102> they do, but that doesn't mean I'll stop being friends with them.
102> I don't think you should bring Mike up with me, though, considering all
102> the outer filthing you did yesterday.
102> I still wouldn't boil a rabbit, Lionel.
102> I'm familiar with the movie, Lionel. I think most people are.
102> But allow me to point out that Dan was a whiny shithead who caused his
102> family a lot of suffering for his bad acts. There's a lot of critical
102> interpretation of that out there, btw, but apparently the Wikipedia
102> editor isn't quite so astute as some reviewers.
102> Nonetheless, I can assure you that I do not have BPD. It was a diagnosis
102> that was ultimately specifically ruled out because of all the lobbying
102> my ex-husband did to pin it on me. (I think I've mentioned him? The guy
102> who brought me razor blades and suggested that cutting might make me
102> feel better?) Too bad for him that the only person in our marriage with
102> a PD was him.
102> So you can keep trying, but the idea of your playing psychologist is
102> even more laughable than that of your playing lawyer.
102> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
102> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
103> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
103> Better get a license to practice before you hang out that shingle,
103> Lionel.
103> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
103> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
104> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
104> Are you projecting again, honey?
104> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
104> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
105> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
105> I'm not doing half the diagnosing you are, Lionel, erroneous or
105> otherwise.
105> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
105> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
106> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
106> Progression and all?
106> I will if you want, but only in the context in which it actually
106> occurred. Of course, that will require quite a bit of additional
106> disclosure, but you're the one who's pushing, and obviously, you've been
106> told an incomplete story.
106> I have many bytes of written documentation to back up my recitation of
106> events, should it become necessary.
106> Do you really want to start the shit with Rick and me again, Lionel?
106> I'll go as many rounds as you like. As I said, it's obvious you've been
106> told an incomplete tale, so if you're going to hound me with it, I'll
106> tell the full version.
106> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
106> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
107> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
107> I don't make lists, Lionel. That's auk's job. It is the litsiest.
107> But you can weed through Kookle and those handy, dandy FAQ links for
107> some of those who were pushed, if you're that interested.
107> When someone is obviously weak or unbalanced or merely unknowledgable,
107> auk goes straight for the throat to humiliate and abuse.
107> It would be one thing if you just stuck with the obnoxious--the ones who
107> can handle it without flying off the handle, but having fun at the
107> expense of those who can't is sadistic.
107> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
107> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
108> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
108> :)
108> I'll never outpost Deco.
108> But I'm having many fewer panic attacks, so posting a lot seems to be
108> working for me.
108> At the rate I'm progressing, I should soon be as I was last May, and
108> then I won't have time to post.
108> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
108> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
109> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
109> <shakes head> I really wish you hadn't pushed this.
109> Your attitude indicates you were told a very short version of a very
109> long story. And the suspicion you have is utterly false to fact.
109> I no longer care what stays private, Lionel. I don't care what anyone
109> knows.
109> I do not self-harm. I have never self-harmed.
109> It is quite true, however, that since October, I have felt that if I
109> were not left alone to put my life in order, I wasn't going to end up
109> with any option but to end it. In point of fact, I was quickly running
109> out of money, as was evidenced by my inability to take care of a broken
109> tooth that caused me great pain or to pay certain bills, including my
109> cell phone bill--which was also my internet access. My credit is ruined,
109> and since the 15th, I'm again having panic attacks. At one point, I was
109> wondering if I would be able to feed myself. At that time, even though I
109> had expressed just that fear, I was being pressed to spend money I
109> didn't have to take the cat to the vet for shots and testing so that my
109> departure date to Australia--one that I had reluctantly agreed to, even
109> though I had repeatedly said I had things I wanted to do here
109> first--would not be delayed.
109> I wrote this in an email on October 29, 2006, on the heels of the first
109> breakup. There's plenty more of exactly the same sentiments and almost
109> exactly the same words, from then until the breakup on February 1 and
109> then again on March 15 and March 23.
109> "I said again and again, in all the ways I knew how--including plain
109> English--that I was stressed and feeling pressured and that I couldn't
109> take it."
109> "I tried to explain my financial situation to you, but even before
109> Texas, it fell on deaf ears. Short of ending the relationship myself,
109> there was nothing for me to do but try to go with the flow until I
109> started feeling like the only solution was to kill myself. Seriously. It
109> was scary. But it was also the indicator to me that I couldn't take
109> anymore."
109> "Your answer to that was not to acquiesce to my expressed need, but to
109> push me harder. (The thing about the cat's shots and tests comes to
109> mind--even knowing (because I'd told you so) that I couldn't afford to
109> pay my bills, you were pushing me to spend more money, because the only
109> thing you were thinking of was my being there, not what would happen to
109> me between now and then.)"
109> "And no, I didn't tell you I was feeling like I wanted to be dead, but
109> that's not the point. It should never have gotten that far, because when
109> I said I was feeling pressured, you should've backed off. I'm not a
109> drama queen, and I'm not going to play the histrionic game--"do it my
109> way or I'll kill myself.""
109> "In my world, if someone cares about me, they hear what I'm telling
109> them, and instead of continuing to push to get me to meet *their* needs,
109> they cut me a little slack to take care of my own."
109> "I didn't ask you to solve my problems for me. I didn't ask you for
109> anything except for less pressure. And no matter how I put it, I
109> couldn't get what I needed."
109> "Even your mother...she didn't have any ideas about the move for me,
109> Rick. Our entire conversation was about how I should drop my life here
109> soonest and get there. That was it. The whole thing. I understood where
109> she was coming from--you're her priority--but all it did was put more
109> pressure on me."
109> Over and over, this same conversation: stop pressuring me, because if
109> you don't, I will not have the means to survive. Five solid months of
109> it. The discussion I had on the 23rd is the same one that I'd had
109> regularly since mid-October, but I'd been trying to make the point that
109> I needed to make an effort here, on my own behalf, since August.
109> I admit to loving him so much that I bent myself into a pretzel trying
109> to accommodate what he wanted me to do. I had to borrow money from the
109> little available to me from the family trust--money I needed to live--to
109> make the trip to Texas, but I wanted it so much, I was willing to risk
109> the consequences. After that, however, no matter how I tried, I couldn't
109> get out from under the relentless pressure.
109> Here is an analogy I wrote for a friend of mine about what happened on
109> the 23rd.
109> A: Sweetheart, if you track mud on my kitchen floor one more time, I'm
109> going to kill you.
109> B: Show us your tits.
109> A: Sweetheart, if you track mud on my kitchen floor one more time, I'm
109> going to kill you.
109> B: After you clean the floor, the bed needs to be made.
109> A: Sweetheart, if you track mud on my kitchen floor one more time, I'm
109> going to kill you.
109> B:If I get that mud on the floor on my socks one more time, I'm going to
109> kill myself.
109> Repeat almost daily for five months.
109> One evening in month five:
109> A: Sweetheart, if you track mud on my kitchen floor one more time, I'm
109> going to kill you.
109> B: Gak! Eek! <dials 911> My wife is threatening to kill me.
109> I suggest you read it very carefully, because it's a rather precise
109> analogy. To make it reality, rather than analogy, you merely need to
109> substitute the idea that "If you don't stop pressuring me, I'm not going
109> to survive this."
109> Not "I have pills and I'm going to take them," or "I have a gun," or
109> "I'm going to carbon monoxide myself in the car" or anything remotely
109> resembling an imminent threat of suicide but simply, "I can't see any
109> way out of this mess. I don't know what else there is to do, because I
109> haven't the means to survive."
109> I've been hanging by my fingernails all this time, and I was almost well
109> enough by March 15 to start pulling myself up, and he struck
109> again--totally out of the blue--in email. He promised not to email
109> again, but he did it anyway on the 23rd. Shall I find that post for you,
109> Lionel? The one where he said he wouldn't email me and then immediately
109> emailed me?
109> Shall I post /everything/ I wrote to him over many months, pleading with
109> him to lay off the pressure?
109> Bear in mind, at the point all this happened, he had ended the
109> relationship on February 1, and I never emailed him again until he
109> wrote to me first on the 15th and then again on the 23rd.
109> I never left the house. The police were here for less than 15 minutes.
109> I looked like I had been crying, and I was a basket case, but that's as
109> much time as it took to explain the situation.
109> I can document the truth of that with times and dates on emails. I wrote
109> to him after the police left and told him they were gone--and also asked
109> him to leave me alone--so he knows for certain they didn't take me away.
109> Also, I have the police report which I picked up at the police station
109> and took with me to the Division of Motor Vehicles to obtain a New
109> Jersey driver's license. It says nothing about my being carted off, for
109> the simple reason I never left the house.
109> I was sitting here trying to reply to Rick's email, when I heard banging
109> on the door. I was terrified, because there was no reason for anyone to
109> be here at that time of night. I didn't believe at first that it was the
109> police, but instead had the passing thought that Dustin's outing had
109> finally borne fruit.
109> The first words out of the cop's mouth were: "We had a very /strange/
109> call..." and simultaneously we both said, "...from Australia."
109> I was embarrassed because the police were given my parents' address and
109> went there first, even though the address where I live is well-known to
109> Rick. The only instance I can find in our emails of my parents' house
109> number is a link to google maps, but there are more than a few instances
109> of /my/ address in our emails. He also knows exactly what kind of
109> relationship I have with my parents and how very humiliating and
109> problematic such a scene would be for me.
109> But publicly humiliating me is nothing new for him.
109> He brought home razor blades and suggested that I cut to relieve
109> tension.
109> I have never cut in my life. And when he tried to have me
109> commmitted--because he didn't want to move out--I was examined by the
109> mental health professional, and rather than locking me up, she sent me
109> home after she made absolutely certain that I would be able to make my
109> ex-husband move out, as he had promised he would do.
109> The look on his face when I walked out of her office and said, "C'mon,
109> let's go, you need to pack," is one I remember with pleasure, even after
109> these many years.
109> If you really believe any of /his/ nonsense had anything to do with me,
109> I would point out that he paid me USD$40k at the termination of what was
109> barely a two-year marriage with no children. The sum paid was the
109> consideration for a general release of the personal injury claim I had
109> against him for the things he did while we were married. I was entitled
109> to much more, but I set the figure based on the minimum I needed to
109> repair the damage he had done, no more.
109> I know. Rick's computer crashed a number of months ago, and I sent him
109> all the emails he'd lost. So there's plenty more where that came from,
109> and all of it verifies everything I've said. I believe I sent him all
109> the chats too, but if they're missing, I'll be happy to provide them
109> again.
109> I'm not the one who made a post calling me an emotional abuser in
109> response to a post that had nothing to do with Rick and me, but with
109> something else entirely. You latched onto my misguided and fruitless
109> effort to stop him from harassing me more than he already has, and
109> you've been relentless in pursuing it. I'm not going to be put in this
109> position, so I'm not going to dance around it anymore. I don't care. I
109> thought you had stopped poking me about Rick, but obviously you just
109> can't let it go, so here it is.
109> You may now feel free to go as far as you like with it, and I will
109> counter everything you insinuate with nothing but facts.
109> I was under relentless pressure for months and months, and whenever I
109> tried to extricate myself, all hell broke loose. I'll detail it blow by
109> blow, if I have to.
109> I was stalked to another newsgroup, I was subjected to flouncing, public
109> humilation and a hostile sock...and a whole lot of other shit in public
109> and in private that no one should ever have to deal with.
109> I can only hope you're happy with your work Mr. Psycho-Stalker-by-Proxy.
109> P.S. Posted below is everything /I/ wrote on the 23rd, except a single
109> paragraph about another poster here and the final email from me the
109> following morning. I have not included what Rick's quotes, but only my
109> own words.
109> 11:58 EDT
109> One thing I've never understood in dealing with people like you--and
109> while it's not nice to put it that way, it wouldn't be truthful to put
109> it any other way--is that even though none of you ever feel compelled to
109> obtain permission before hurting me, you need me to beg before you'll
109> fix the damage you've done. It's just remarkable to me.
109> <snip>
109> Of course.
109> You'll admit, however, that in the long term, it is actually easier for
109> you to be confused and confounded than to take any action.
109> <snip>
109> Honestly, no.
109> There are only two choices when one breaks something: fix it or throw it
109> away. There are responsibilities and consequences for each action, but
109> standing over what is broken, wringing ones hands and saying, "Oh what
109> shall I do?" is the mark of someone who wants to pawn off his
109> responsibilities onto someone, anyone else.
109> It is normal for children to do this, but in adults, this kind of
109> childishness is unattractive at best.
109> <snip>
109> I didn't email you, but I wasn't going to allow you to dictate my
109> participation on usenet. So the answer is, I tried, but you wouldn't
109> leave me alone. You just kept batting me around like a cat toy.
109> What you don't understand is that I was trying very hard to survive
109> this, in spite of you.
109> It is not that I am suicidal or that I want to die, but just that when
109> one is out of resources...<shrug>...well, what do you do? I've had at
109> least three friends kill themselves because they couldn't see a way out
109> of their financial difficulties. I couldn't understand it. Really. But
109> if you recognize that "financial difficulties" is really a euphemism for
109> unable to take care of ones basic needs, it becomes a different matter
109> entirely.
109> You made me choose between attending to you and meeting my basic
109> survival needs. Not only did it fuck me up in very practical ways, it
109> also triggered my PTSD, so that even after I forcibly pulled myself from
109> your grip, I couldn't function anymore.
109> Do you really think I would have lived in that kind of pain for two
109> entire months if I had another choice? And how was I to manage a job
109> interview when I barely had the ability to speak?
109> Are you so clueless...I guess you are.
109> I never asked you for anything except to let me take care of myself, and
109> now I don't have the ability to do so.
109> You are such an asshole.
109> <snip>
109> You've already fucked me good with your argument by snippage and your
109> vile attacks.
109> Thanks for that.
109> <snip>
109> You can?
109> Jesus, you're a jerk.
109> <snip>
109> "Now that I've beaten the shit out of you, I won't hit you anymore. Oh
109> and there's ice in the fridge if you need it."
109> The problem is, I've heard that from you before. Recently, in fact.
109> <snip>
109> Do you get that this is way too little, way too late, and that this is
109> part of my tying up my loose ends?
109> 16:39 EDT
109> <snipped>
109> I know.
109> I never expected you would fix anything.
109> Hoped? Well, sure. I am scared and in a lot of pain, so even the
109> thinnest hope is something, but I also know that when people want to do
109> things, they do them, instead of talk about them until the need for
109> their doing passes.
109> I really hope you'll see your way clear to leave me alone now. I didn't
109> try to tie you up in knots after you said it was over, and I don't think
109> it's too much for you to do the same for me.
109> I'm glad, however, that you've found a lie you can tell yourself to make
109> yourself feel better. Unfortunately, no matter how you twist it, Rick,
109> it's like Dr. Tudor used to say, "Forget 'separate realities'. What are
109> the facts?"
109> There really is a pattern to your behavior, even if you can't see it.
109> The plain and simple fact of my behavior is that I loved you with every
109> bit of love inside me--and I stretched myself really thin to show you
109> just how much--and you took it all in and gave none of it back to me,
109> not even when I really needed it from you. And when I tried to fix my
109> life so I would survive it, you got in the way of that too.
109> 18:42 EDT
109> I never lied to you.
109> I never sicced a sock on you.
109> I didn't routinely try to score points off you whether it humiliated you
109> or not
109> And when I said to you, if you don't give me some room to do this stuff,
109> I won't survive, you didn't let more than a couple of days go by before
109> you sent me the letter that I've quoted down below.
109> When I tell you that I have no money, that I have no job, that I'm in a
109> really dire situation, you tell me "fuck off, you're manipulative,
109> you're a hypocrite."
109> But I'm not. I haven't manipulated you in any way, and none of my
109> behavior has been hypocritical. That's just the big lie you tell
109> yourself so you can feel better about what you've done to me.
109> I have no money.
109> I have no job.
109> I wake up early every morning because of nightmares and panic attacks.
109> My tooth isn't healed, and I'm afraid it's going to abscess again. I was
109> in pain from it for two months.
109> I'm very low on thyroid medicine, and I can't afford to see a doctor.
109> My car registration and my drivers license both expire at the end of
109> this month, and I haven't the wherewithal to do anything to take care of
109> either.
109> I don't eat right, because I can't afford it, and I'm too depressed to
109> cook real meals anyway.
109> Speaking of depression, I don't go out of the house more than once a
109> week, some days I don't even get dressed.
109> I am paralyzed by the terror I have felt for the last several months.
109> My credit is ruined, because I can't pay my bills.
109> I have borrowed to the limit from the trust, so I have no resources at
109> all.
109> That's what I've been facing all along--the only thing I did have was
109> money from the trust, but I couldn't get more than a very small amount
109> at a time, so I've been living on less than $600 a month since almost
109> the time I came back from Texas, and now I don't have that.
109> There is more. None of it is positive.
109> The purpose of this letter is to illustrate your pattern (see the
109> attached and what's below) and to let you know it is quite clear to me
109> that you don't love me, and could give a flying fuck what happens to me.
109> I just want it to be very clear what you turned your face away from and
109> didn't want to hear in all those months. I didn't ask you to take care
109> of me, because I knew you wouldn't. But it's really fucked up that you
109> fought me every time I tried to take care of myself.
109> No one says you have to love another person, but there is no excuse for
109> the way you've treated me.
109> This email dates from the end of November. How can it be that even now,
109> nothing has changed in your mind?
109> <snipped>
109> 18:56 EDT
109> Is that what you thought tying up loose ends meant?
109> <laughing>
109> We weren't in it together, because you couldn't see how thin I was
109> stretched trying to survive. You weren't helping me to survive--I was
109> completely on my own. It didn't matter if I ate, as long as I got the
109> cat taken care of so that I could keep to your schedule.
109> What kind of message is that? If it doesn't matter if I'm hungry, what
109> are you telling me?
109> My problems are very practical problems, Rick.
109> It's very hard to explain to someone what's going to happen so that it
109> doesn't appear to be a histrionic threat.
109> I have no resources. I have no way to survive.
109> I spent two months planning my suicide in November and December and then
109> in January, I rallied and tried to figure out some way to make it, and
109> then it was more of the same with you and me until the beginning of
109> February and I went through it again.
109> Between February 1 and March 13, I almost had a grip on it, but there
109> was so little time left, and now there isn't any.
109> How stupid are you that you think I actually have the emotional
109> wherewithal to go back over the shit in the past as if I even have the
109> fucking time to do that.
109> I can't get /my/ depression treated, because I haven't the money to see
109> a doctor.
109> In November and December, possibly because of the infection in my tooth,
109> something weird was going on with my heart, and my blood pressure was
109> extremely high, especially for someone who always has low blood
109> pressure. I thought the machine at the drug store was broken, but it
109> wasn't.
109> So I've had sickness and terror and poverty, and you were never, ever
109> there for me, and even at the very end, it was still, "there's nothing I
109> can do."
109> I'm trying to find some way to live, but I'm out of time.
109> I can't believe you're really so dense.
109> 19:15 EDT
109> <snipped>
109> When I read that line, it makes me so crazy--because as I told you, I
109> was right on the edge anyway--that I just want to beat my head against
109> the wall--literally.
109> Right now, all I want to do is go to sleep and never get up again. Ever.
109> I guess you think you made an effort...but I have to tell you, all it
109> ever seemed that you had to say to me was "I don't have anything for
109> you" and before that, "I need more than what I'm getting from you."
109> So we see it differently. And now, all I see is that I have made a
109> threat and you're responding to that--because you surely never responded
109> to all the begging I did--and I have never backed anyone into that kind
109> of corner and I'm not going to start now.
109> The only things I've ever taken from anyone were the things they gave
109> freely, not the things they felt coerced to give, and I'm not about to
109> change that now.
109> 19:31 EDT
109> <snipped>
109> I've been trying to fight back for months now. What did you think I was
109> trying to make you understand all that time?
109> I don't have any fight left in me.
109> <snipped>
109> Someday go back and read that last email you wrote me, and imagine how
109> you would feel had I written it to you if you were sitting contemplating
109> all the things you wished you'd done in your life:
109> "If you don't get what I'm trying to tell you in this email then you
109> will never benefit from anything that's happened between us."
109> 19:51 EDT-Based on the time of the police report, this email may have
109> been received before the call was made, but it is more likely that it
109> came afterward.
109> <snipped>
109> No.
109> I have tried to get you to see me all this time without resorting to
109> histrionics. I really have made every effort for you to see the
109> condition I was in, without making threats, although at least once, I
109> told you I had considered it.
109> If I could've gotten some balance, I could've fixed things. That's all I
109> wanted--a little equilibrium. I begged you for it. You were never in it
109> with me--although I tried not to put it in a "blaming" way--and I could
109> deal with that, but I couldn't deal with the fact that every time I
109> tried to help myself, you got in my way.
109> It's my nature to accommodate, but how far can any one person bend
109> before she breaks?
109> I'm tired of tears and all this pain; I really can't take it anymore,
109> and things are too fucked up to fix. I'm proud of the fact that I kept
109> trying--even if it got pretty feeble recently--but I just ran out of the
109> wherewithal to do anything.
109> Right now, there's not much that's being accomplished, and it's not
109> going to do your mental health any good to listen to any of this,
109> because it can't be anything but a beating for you. But you thought it
109> was a beating all along, when all I wanted was for you to stop hurting
109> me.
109> My father has always used his chronic depression like a club. I don't
109> want to be like that; I've made every effort in my life not to make my
109> issues a club to keep everyone else in line. If someone doesn't want to
109> do something for me, that's okay. I can live with it, as long as they
109> don't keep telling me how much they care.
109> I don't really want a whole lot, but what I can't live without is pretty
109> specific. And I tell people at the outset. But for some reason, no one
109> ever believes me.
109> 20:10 EDT--This one was written and in the outbox at approximately 20:00
109> EDT, but I had not clicked send when the police knocked at the door, so
109> it went out automatically approximately 10 minutes later. Take note that
109> the police definitely arrived at my house *before* Rick received this
109> email.
109> <snipped>
109> We disagree.
109> <snipped>
109> Your lack of awareness isn't the reason.
109> I told you more than once: it's a very practical matter. I haven't the
109> wherewithal to fix things.
109> I'm not in this situation /because/ I am depressed. I am depressed
109> because I'm in this situation. I have never been in a situation like the
109> one I'm in right now, and there's no way out.
109> One of the problems is that I stopped having anything to do with my
109> other friends over the course of our relationship. It just made things
109> easier with you so I didn't fight it. So I don't even have the idea that
109> I might have options, i.e., someone to go to for help. Do you
109> understand?
109> And the whole bit about announcing my plans to move to Australia just
109> sent my mother and I down a road that has led to a huge
109> rupture...<shakes head>...I don't want to talk about my family. I took a
109> lot of flak from Uncle Bill this last time I asked for money, and I just
109> can't do it again, even if there were money to be had.
109> I have nothing to hang onto. That's the problem. I gave everything to
109> you, and I held out nothing for myself, and here I am. Emotionally,
109> financially and in all other ways, I'm drained. At the end of this
109> month, I can't drive my car--no license, no registration. I can't drive
109> it at night because of the deer (the light is broken, and I don't want a
109> ticket) and I can't afford the insurance deductible. And a whole long
109> list of things that have just gone from bad to worse, because I couldn't
109> function to fix them, first because I couldn't get you to recognize I
109> needed time to get my life in order and after that because I just
109> couldn't function.
109> I need to go lay down now. I don't feel very good at all. I've been
109> crying most of the day today, and my head hurts.
109> 20:17 EDT - After this email, I received no further replies. The
109> remaining emails are simply the replies to those of his emails I had not
109> yet answered when the police came.
109> <snipped>
109> The police have been and gone.
109> Please leave me alone.
109> 20:59 EDT
109> <snipped>
109> P.P.S. I've stopped shaking now. If you had thought it through, you
109> would realize that I wouldn't do anything in a way that would damage
109> Becky. I am now going to have to deal with the fallout from this with my
109> mother, which is just one more thing. I don't think there was anything
109> in any of my emails to indicate to you that I was sitting here, handgun
109> in mouth, ready to blow my brains out. You have no idea what it's like
109> to have the cops bang on the door, and try to wipe the tears out of your
109> eyes so you look half decent to deal with one more fucking thing, but I
109> did it.
109> Do you have any compassion for me?
109> Do not do anything more, Rick, because there are things I really need to
109> take care of if I can, and all you're going to do is get in the way of
109> my doing them. I do have things I care about deeply and I will not thank
109> you if you prevent me from attending to them.
109> Furthermore, try to keep your eye on the ball and understand that we're
109> talking about some very pragmatic stuff here that antidepressant
109> medication isn't going to fix. In point of fact, if you do manage to get
109> me taken out of play for the three days they can keep me, it's not going
109> to change the situation I am in one iota. That's the problem. Not the
109> depression, not the misery and fear and panic that I feel, but the fact
109> that I am not in a position to fix the situation I'm in.
109> I really wish you hadn't done that. It was pretty horrible for me.
109> 23:16 EDT
109> <snipped>
109> I missed the point?
109> Look at what you quoted.
109> You said it was over, I said okay.
109> And I didn't write to you anymore. I left you alone. And you came back
109> to let me know that you were fine and there was nothing you could do for
109> me.
109> Imagine how happy I must have been to hear that.
109> <snipped>
109> I stopped asking you to do anything when you ended the relationship. And
109> the thing I asked you to do all along was /only/ to let me take care of
109> myself.
109> It only came up again because you told me, unsolicited, "I'm so sorry,
109> there's nothing I can do."
109> Do you have that yet?
109> <snipped>
109> Do you see yet how self-serving this is?
109> When I said "We are not in this together" it was because you were
109> clearly not in it with me. It was me in it with you and me in it by
109> myself, but never you in it with me.
109> Try to be me for 30 seconds, Rick. Just 30 seconds of empathy for what
109> my life has been like with someone who can't stop saying "I love you"
109> but who couldn't put any action into the words even when I said my life
109> was going to depend on it.
109> Your need not to look back is fine, but what you don't see is that it's
109> all you do. All through this discussion we've been having since you
109> wrote me, unsolicited, on the 13th is /your/ inability to go forward and
109> do something that might be to my benefit rather than to my detriment.
109> You're the one who is stuck in the past--go look at your emails to
109> me--because it's a whole lot easier to be there than to figure out how
109> to glue together what you broke. You want to act like my need to fix my
109> life requires that I rehash something when all along I've just needed
109> something different to happen than what continues to happen.
109> I can't sleep, I am a basket case. It is just unfathomable to me that
109> you could project so much on me that has nothing to do with anything
109> I've said or done.
109> 7:43 EDT-March 24
109> I'm not going to post this one, because although it illustrates a
109> pattern, it's also filled with personal information that is not my
109> personal information.
109> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
109> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
110> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
110> Seconded.
110> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
110> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
111> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
111> <snipped>
111> I would add here, however, that a) you'll need to get a second that
111> isn't me, and b) I said I wasn't going to post his emails. I haven't.
111> I've posted my own. I've got five months of emails like those. If I'm
111> going to get a KotM nom out of it, I may as well post all of them.
111> You're the one who turned "his emails" into "personal information."
111> Just a technicality, but one that is important to me.
111> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
111> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
112> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
112> If that was your intent, you've failed miserably.
112> I feel better right at this moment, at 3:02 AM, my time, that I've felt
112> in weeks.
112> When I was 15 years old, my father beat my face into a hardwood floor,
112> because I stood up to him. And then I stood up to him again, and I
112> reported it.
112> I have never stood down against abusive people, Lionel, and I never will
112> for as long as I live.
112> I was told long ago that you're a kook, and your continuing pursuit of
112> me demonstrates it quite clearly.
112> Make sure you hold to that after Rick makes his report to the Australian
112> Federal Police, and they come knocking at your door to talk to you about
112> your part in this.
112> *their own*
112> That would be you.
112> news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
112> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
112> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
113> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
113> Don't call me Shirley.
113> He began the round with this post:
113> news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
113> How personal is that?
113> And your group-think is boggling. But don't worry, there are enough of
113> you that you'll get that second any time now.
113> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
113> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
114> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
114> OMG. In all this nonsense, I just keep forgetting.
114> How does one pronounce "Hypnerotomachia"? It slowed me down because I
114> kept trying new ways to say it.
114> I enjoyed this book so much more than /The DaVinci Code/, and I'm so
114> very grateful to you for mentioning it to me. All of it was wonderful,
114> but what I most needed right now was the anecdote of the dog. It has
114> stayed in the back of my mind these last few weeks (because I got the
114> book right away and finished it quickly), and my one thought throughout
114> has been: "there's no good reason for me to play the dog anymore."
114> I haven't listened to Cheryl Wheeler yet, but I've got her here, and
114> when I get a moment, I'll listen, and let you know.
114> Thanks for everything, John.
114> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
114> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
115> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
115> Nope.
115> I chose to do it because Lionel pushed it.
115> No one made me do it. It was my choice. But I wouldn't have had any
115> reason to do it if I hadn't been pushed.
115> We're all responsible for our own stuff, so don't put words in my mouth
115> or twist the words I write, Kali.
115> Keep bringing him into it, and I will continue to feel the need to stand
115> up to it.
115> There is no Cabal.
115> You've got all the insight of a rock. And I don't mean just as it
115> applies to my situation.
115> You can discover what your enemy fears most by
115> observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
What does that have to do with OS/2, Kirk?
================================================================================
Lionel writes:
64> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
64> Yeah? Would you like me to repost all the stuff that /you/ haven't
64> answered, Bunny-Boiler?
64> <sarcasm>Oh, well that would certainly explain why you're chatting
64> away with him as he attacks your 'enemies'.</sarcasm> Is that part of
64> your cunning plan to "find and disarm" him?
64> The reason I had a "clash" with him is because he was (& still is)
64> forging people in the photography newsgroups, Rhodenta, & harrassing
64> the families of several of those people in real life.
64> Oh yeah, I keep on forgetting that that shit doesn't count if you
64> sucker other people into doing it for you.
64> Frankly, it doesn't really matter. Steve's crazy enough, & has been
64> doing this long enough, that people have figured him out for
64> themselves - long before you flounced into AUK to tell us all how evil
64> we are.
64> According to him, presumably, because you obviously haven't done any
64> research, & have no idea how bad he used to be.
64> Like Crasston, he's attacking people on your behalf, Rhodenta - so of
64> course he looks better in your eyes.
64> Bunny Boiler
64> ....
64> From the 1987 film Fatal Attraction, in which a character exacts
64> revenge on an ex-lover by killing his daughter's pet rabbit and
64> leaving it boiling on the stove to be found by his family.
64> ....
64> bunny boiler (plural bunny boilers)
64> 1. An excessively obsessive girlfriend (or less commonly,
64> boyfriend), especially one who reacts in an extreme way to the ending
64> of a relationship.
64> ---
64> Fatal Attraction
64> From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
64> Directed by Adrian Lyne
64> Produced by Stanley R. Jaffe
64> Sherry Lansing
64> Starring Michael Douglas
64> Glenn Close
64> Anne Archer
64> ....
64> Fatal Attraction is a 1987 thriller about a married man who has a
64> weekend affair with a woman who refuses to allow it to end and who
64> becomes obsessed with him. It stars Michael Douglas, Glenn Close and
64> Anne Archer.
64> Synopsis
64> Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.
64> Dan Gallagher is a happily-married New York attorney living in
64> Manhattan until he meets Alex Forrest, an editor from a publishing
64> company, through business. While his wife, Beth, and their daughter
64> are out of town for the weekend, Dan has a brief affair with Alex.
64> What Dan thought would be a simple fling turns into a dangerous affair
64> when Alex begins to cling to him obsessively, showing many signs of
64> Borderline Personality Disorder -- fear of abandonment, instability,
64> impulsive actions, switching from adoring to devaluing others,
64> manipulation, suicidal gestures, cutting, binge eating and intense
64> anger and bitterness.
64> Alex Forrest's mental instability initially surfaces when she attempts
64> suicide after Dan explains to her that he must go home and get on with
64> his life. Dan thinks the affair is forgotten, but Alex begins to show
64> up at various places to see him. She is waiting for him at his office
64> one day to apologize and invite him to an opera with her, but he turns
64> her down. She then begins to call Dan's office until he tells his
64> secretary he will no longer take her calls. When he confronts her
64> about her actions, she replies, "Well, what am I supposed to do? You
64> won't answer my calls, you change your number, I'm not going to be
64> ignored, Dan!"
64> [Hm. Kind of like the way you're posting to AUK, Rhodenta.]
64> Alex starts calling Dan's home and then informs Dan that she is
64> pregnant and planning to keep the baby. Although Dan wants nothing to
64> do with her, she insists that he must take responsibility.
64> As Alex continues to stalk Dan and his family, she has a voice
64> recording delivered to Dan and follows him home one night to spy on
64> him and his wife and daughter from the bushes in his yard; the sight
64> of their family life literally makes her sick to her stomach. Alex's
64> obsession, which grows stronger as time goes on, eventually turns to
64> madness.
64> At one point, while the Gallaghers are away from home, Alex even kills
64> Dan's daughter Ellen's pet rabbit and puts it on their stove to boil.
64> By this time, Beth has been told of the affair and Alex's pregnancy
64> claim and has warned Alex over the phone that if she persists, she
64> will kill her. Alex goes on to kidnap Ellen from school one day. And
64> although she takes Ellen home, Beth, in a panic while searching for
64> her child, is injured in a car accident.
64> Finally, Alex becomes determined to eliminate what she sees as her
64> main obstacle--Dan's wife. While Beth is in the bathroom, Alex's
64> reflection appears in the mirror. As she attacks Beth with a butcher
64> knife, Dan hears the screaming and runs in, wrestling Alex into the
64> bathtub and drowning her... or so he thinks. She suddenly emerges from
64> the water, swinging her knife at him. Beth, who has gone in search of
64> the gun Dan has bought, appears in the doorway and shoots her.
65> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
65> It's symptomatic of her narcissism that Queen Bunny Boiler thinks
65> she's the sole arbiter of TRVTH & JVSTICE in Usenet. Her dogged belief
65> that my 'credibility' in the eyes of an obsessive, stalking net-kook
65> is of any importance to me or anyone else in AUK reveals far more
65> about her than she imagines.
66> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
66> A snapshot view of AUK though Rhodenta's eyes:
67> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
67> You first, Hon.
68> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
68> Tell us all again about the police visting you on the 23rd, Drama
68> Queen.
68> S'funny, because you play both more often than I do, & I seem to have
68> a better track record. Nor am I the one stalking their ex on Usenet &
68> making up lurid stories about them.
69> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
69> [...]
69> Who, exactly? Name one of these people that you claim have "gone off
69> the edge" from being "lied about" in AUK, bunny boiler?
70> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
70> [...]
70> Yeah, by you. Let's take a look at this little soap opera of yours, in
70> your own words, shall we?:
70> The didn't stay very long, but I had already had a very trying day,
70> and it was a difficult and embarrassing situation. Fortunately, I had
70> sufficient documentation and self-control to solve the problem.
70> Nonetheless, if it becomes necessary, those lines of communication are
70> now readily open to me.
70> I did not open them. One more time, Lionel, it was not me who called
70> the police.
70> <sigh>
70> It's still Sooper Sekrit Infoomation, Lionel. We were planning to get
70> married. I was planning to move to Australia. The fact that it went
70> wrong doesn't change the earlier intention. And the stuff that is
70> actually private has stayed private so far, except from the police,
70> because I had no choice in the matter. It will continue to stay
70> private from you.
70> [...]
70> Even my threat to post the emails only violates a rule of netiquette,
70> not a rule of law.
70> The same principle applies to talking about those events that occurred
70> in real life that had not already been posted to usenet. Those that
70> had already been posted are, of course, fodder for discussion by any
70> set of rules.
70> ------
70> In the above posts, you're clearly trying to create the impression
70> that your ex is an abusive psycho who made some kind of false police
70> report about you in an attempt to harass you. However, the quoted
70> context (& that of dozens of your other posts) creates for me a strong
70> suspicion that you were playing one of your nasty, manipulative little
70> stalker games with someone by self-harming or threatening to do so, &
70> that the person fell for your bullshit, panicked, & called the
70> authorities in the naive belief that your life was in danger. The cops
70> turned up on your doorstep, & (presumably, given that it's SOP)
70> dragged you off for a psych assessment that diagnosed you as nothing
70> more than a harmless attention-whore. Quite understandably, you found
70> the experience incredibly embarrassing, & spent some time coming up
70> with a way of spinning it in public that would make it possible for
70> you to paint yourself as a stalking victim instead of a nutcase.
70> Now, in /that/ context, your sad little story in this post about your
70> previous ex giving you razor blades & suggesting you cut yourself,
70> sounds rather different to the way you've spun it here, & rather more
70> like a description of some poor bastard who you've tried to manipulate
70> one too many times with melodramatic threats to self-harm, & who has
70> simply called your bluff - a response that seems to me to be perfectly
70> understandable from anyone who's been saddled with a bunny boiling
70> Drama Queen for any length of time.
70> So have I, bunny boiler. All in your own words. There's *lots* more
70> where that came from.
70> 'Start'? - Notice that all the quoted material above is your very own
70> words, & that all of it can be easily verified by anyone interested in
70> doing so.
70> You do that, Honey, but I'll be right here to de-spin your
70> stalkers-eye view of the universe.
71> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
71> Knew you couldn't, Drama Queen.
71> One's like you, bunny boiler?
72> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
72> [Two decades worth of "All My Children" & "OC" plotlines snipped
72> to protect the CHIIIILLLLDREN!!111!11!!!!!11!]
72> I would, but other than this post, I'm recusing myself from nom'ing,
72> seconding, or voting for Rhonda for anything, because my reasons for
72> turning her skull into a post-apocolyptic nuclear wasteland -
72> populated only by scattered tribes of feral survivors, & the desperate
72> vermin who prey upon them - were 100% personal, rather than for honest
72> Kookology, so I couldn't possibly claim that such nom's or seconds
72> weren't revenge-based.
72> I will note, however, that IMHO, she's definitely deserving of the
72> awards appropriate to those who post personal email, who twist logic
72> into pretzels, & who throw nuclear meltdowns.
73> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
73> Please give it serious consideration before posting any more on this
73> topic. Okay?
74> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
74> He doesn't post a whole lot in here, but he's been around for quite a
74> while.
What does any of that have to do with OS/2 or singles, Lionel?
================================================================================
Sean Monaghan writes:
29> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
29> Tyrone is real, and the nomination (if seconded) will be considered on its
29> own merits.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Monaghan?
================================================================================
oldco...@sbcglobal.net writes:
3> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
3> Yeah, remember this was discussed at length many times in years past.
3> There is no argument with the quantization of light at low amplitudes,
3> as seen in the photoelectric effect, diffraction grate experiments
3> etc. But at real world amplitudes, the perceived "particle" nature
3> falls away and these are WAVES, plain and simple.. waves propagating
3> in their carrier medium at the fixed velocity, c. That fixed value
3> *demonstrates* a carrier medium. Otherwise the 'flying photons' would
3> have to somehow magically 'know' to fly only at that speed thru the
3> void.
3> Yet the mainstream's unyielding adherance to the no-
3> medium doctrine *absolutely* needs its acoutrements of 'magical
3> messengers'.. flying photons, gravitons etc. (not to be confused with
3> the very real but short-lived *condensates* released in accelerator
3> collisions)
3> In another post you mentioned the solar (Crookes) radiometer,
3> apparently implying it demonstrates radiation pressure, which DD/db
3> will jump all over you for. 'Member, this was discussed once before
3> too. It's actually a simple heat engine, running on thermal
3> disequilibrium between the dark and light sides of the vanes. It'll
3> run only in a certain range of partial vacuum, and won't run at all in
3> a hard vacuum, proving it does not run on radiation pressure.
What does that have to do with OS/2, oldcoot?
================================================================================
Painius writes:
60> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
60> Nice trap, you'll have to admit, eh?
60> You fell into the exact same trap that science
60> fell into over eighty years ago, Goose!
60> Carl Sagan *never* said "billions and billions".
60> This was a Johnny Carson joke.
60> Cary Grant *never* once in any of his movies
60> ever said, "Judy, Judy, Judy", and yet this is
60> always used by comedians to be one of Grant's
60> keynote sayings.
60> James Cagney *never* in any of his films said,
60> "You dirty rat! I'm gonna get you, and I'm
60> gonna get you good!" But many Jimmy fans
60> believe that he did. Another comedian joke.
60> Albert Einstein *never* said nor wrote that the
60> ether didn't exist and space was a void. All he
60> did say was that the ether did not have to exist
60> in order for his general theory of relativity to
60> work. He said his field equations would work
60> just as well if space were void.
60> And i *never* said that "photons don't exist".
60> All i said was that, since space is not a void,
60> then there are no need for photons.
60> (This is not to say that photons don't exist.
60> All i said is that there's no need for them.)
60> Your goose is *COOKED*! <g>
60> And don't talk to me about "implied meanings".
60> Einstein "implied" that space could be void for
60> specific reasons that are part of history.
60> I, on the other hand, "implied" photons don't
60> exist to trap you, and you were trapped really
60> good!
60> Ain't it grand that the void-space paradigm is
60> based solely upon what scientists wanted to
60> hear, but didn't?
60> Space is a void nothing.
60> Say it over and over if you like, but always
60> know that Einstein never said it, never wrote
60> it, and most probably never actually believed
60> it.
60> happy days and...
60> starry starry nights!
60> Space must flow
60> As the wind must blow,
60> The wind doth blow
60> If we see it or no.
60> Space must blow
60> If we need it or no,
60> If space didn't flow,
60> Where the heck'd we go?
61> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
61> Saying what i said without the grin symbol (<g>)
61> *might* have been uncivil, although even without
61> the grin, i doubt most Gentle Readers would have
61> thought i was serious.
61> So are you actually so clueless? or you just don't
61> have a sense of humor. What a hoot. A man with
61> no sense of humor trying to get laughs with silly,
61> childish awards. No wonder your approval rating
61> is lower than Bush's. <g>
61> (Now THAT was uncivil! even *with* the grin.)
61> happy days and...
61> starry starry nights!
61> Space must flow
61> As the wind must blow,
61> The wind doth blow
61> If we see it or no.
61> Space must blow
61> If we need it or no,
61> If space didn't flow,
61> Where the heck'd we go?
62> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
62> Lack of thorough refutation noted.
62> happy days and...
62> starry starry nights!
62> Space must flow
62> As the wind must blow,
62> The wind doth blow
62> If we see it or no.
62> Space must blow
62> If we need it or no,
62> If space didn't flow,
62> Where the heck'd we go?
63> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
63> I don't think i've ever thanked you for the one time
63> in all our intercourse that you actually showed some
63> semblance of humanity. It was back when i went
63> through my "security officer runned over by a truck"
63> crisis. You said something to the effect that if the
63> story were true, you felt sympathetic.
63> The story *was* true, so thank you for that.
63> And now i can thank you for your naming the
63> postulate after me, though sarcastically. I do
63> believe that Einstein's generalised postulate of
63> gravitation will someday be revered as the one
63> physical reality that tames all the rest. And that
63> Albert Einstein will receive the Nobel for his
63> encouragement of the postulate's investigation
63> by science.
63> <g>
63> I don't expect to get the Nobel myself, no matter
63> *how* hard you attempt to get it for me. But
63> thank you anyway for trying!
63> You can soar the eagle's path when you wanna.
63> I wonder why you prefer to dig thru the dregs?
63> happy days and...
63> starry starry nights!
63> On a highway to the sky,
63> That's the trip for you and I,
63> Find the gods who make you cry
63> On the highway to the sky.
63> Many wonders catch your eye,
63> Puzzles tease and mystify,
63> Some you solve and some you sigh
63> On that highway to the sky.
64> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
64> If he can't even get this straight, Honest, how's
64> he ever gonna pass his astrophysics exams? <g>
64> He confuses Alan Guth with Brad Guth, then he
64> gets Bill and me mixed up. Next, we'll see him
64> attribute the causal theory of relativity to the
64> Kadaitcha Man! and K-Man can't get past the
64> binary number system! (He uses his two hands
64> to count with instead of his ten fingers like we
64> do.)
64> WAIT! hmm... Einstein's field equations using
64> the binary number system!
64> NAAAHHHHH !
64> (already been done)
64> happy days and...
64> starry starry nights!
64> On a highway to the sky,
64> That's the trip for you and I,
64> Find the gods who make you cry
64> On the highway to the sky.
64> Many wonders catch your eye,
64> Puzzles tease and mystify,
64> Some you solve and some you sigh
64> On that highway to the sky.
65> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
65> *ding*
65> Don't send checks, just send cash.
65> happy days and...
65> starry starry nights!
65> On a highway to the sky,
65> That's the trip for you and I,
65> Find the gods who make you cry
65> On the highway to the sky.
65> Many wonders catch your eye,
65> Puzzles tease and mystify,
65> Some you solve and some you sigh
65> On that highway to the sky.
66> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
66> If it's so simple, then why don't *you* esplain
66> it to me, Lucy?...
66> How does an atom generate a gravitational field?
66> How does this hypothetical atom-generated field
66> add itself to fields generated by other atoms?
66> How can this happen as regards the so-called
66> "weakest force" of Nature, when the so-called
66> "strongest force" of Nature, the SNF, cannot
66> even hardly reach much beyond the outer edge
66> of the atomic nucleus?
66> You're fulla crap, as always, Mother. You could
66> not esplain your way out of a paper bag.
66> happy days and...
66> starry starry nights!
66> Astrology! so long ago,
66> So far away in time and place,
66> Astronomers would use to crow,
66> To fund their work, to feed their face.
66> At present, 'tis a huge disgrace,
66> Tho' scientist must try to see
66> That many a DONOR keeps apace
66> With modern-day astrology!
67> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
67> Nor will using archaic, fifty-year-old lames
67> help yours, Goose.
67> honky days and...
67> starry starry nights!
67> Oh Selene! such a Major and Beautiful planet!
67> Such wonders, maria, those craters that span it,
67> And how 'bout those phases--Full, New, and in Quarter?
67> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to transport her!
67> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to import her!
67> But Oh! she is HUGE, a full planet no doubt,
67> Until this is seen i continue to SHOUT!
67> Until people see her a sis to our queen,
67> I safeguard the secrets of Goddess Selene!
67> I safeguard the secrets of Planet Selene!
68> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
68> You're right about the Crookes radiometer, but i
68> was thinking more in terms of this one...
68> Radiation pressure is very real, Bill. It was first
68> postulated by Maxwell, i think. And then proven
68> by Lebedev at the turn of the century (the last
68> century).
68> happy days and...
68> starry starry nights!
68> Oh Selene! such a Major and Beautiful planet!
68> Such wonders, maria, those craters that span it,
68> And how 'bout those phases--Full, New, and in Quarter?
68> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to transport her!
68> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to import her!
68> But Oh! she is HUGE, a full planet no doubt,
68> Until this is seen i continue to SHOUT!
68> Until people see her a sis to our queen,
68> I safeguard the secrets of Goddess Selene!
68> I safeguard the secrets of Planet Selene!
69> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.autos.mini,comp.os.os2.advocacy
69> Why? because they defy gravity? <g>
69> happy days and...
69> starry starry nights!
69> Oh Selene! such a Major and Beautiful planet!
69> Such wonders, maria, those craters that span it,
69> And how 'bout those phases--Full, New, and in Quarter?
69> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to transport her!
69> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to import her!
69> But Oh! she is HUGE, a full planet no doubt,
69> Until this is seen i continue to SHOUT!
69> Until people see her a sis to our queen,
69> I safeguard the secrets of Goddess Selene!
69> I safeguard the secrets of Planet Selene!
70> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
70> And you call this "science"? like the HUP is
70> an intrinsic property of Nature? Pretty smelly,
70> Mom.
70> I'll give you a "no-bullshit" credit, Goose.
70> "I don't know," is presently and truly the
70> best answer *anybody* can muster.
70> What if the vectors are 180 degrees out? <g>
70> So i see! You're saying that the magnitude is
70> inversely proportional to the range (distance).
70> I wonder if John Zinni would go along with
70> your obvious attempt to thwart the inverse-
70> square law?
70> That's comforting.
70> I don't accept them because they're friggin' crap!
70> You're unwitting support of my k.lames is noted.
70> OH!...
70> Thank you again, Goose!
70> happy days and...
70> starry starry nights!
70> Oh Selene! such a Major and Beautiful planet!
70> Such wonders, maria, those craters that span it,
70> And how 'bout those phases--Full, New, and in Quarter?
70> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to transport her!
70> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to import her!
70> But Oh! she is HUGE, a full planet no doubt,
70> Until this is seen i continue to SHOUT!
70> Until people see her a sis to our queen,
70> I safeguard the secrets of Goddess Selene!
70> I safeguard the secrets of Planet Selene!
71> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
71> Say *WHAT*?
71> Since when does Mother Goose give far better
71> explanations than you?
71> I ask you again...
71> Who the fuck are you, and what the fuck have
71> you done with Phineas?
71> happy days and...
71> starry starry nights!
71> Oh Selene! such a Major and Beautiful planet!
71> Such wonders, maria, those craters that span it,
71> And how 'bout those phases--Full, New, and in Quarter?
71> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to transport her!
71> Why YES if i could, i would LOVE to import her!
71> But Oh! she is HUGE, a full planet no doubt,
71> Until this is seen i continue to SHOUT!
71> Until people see her a sis to our queen,
71> I safeguard the secrets of Goddess Selene!
71> I safeguard the secrets of Planet Selene!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Painius?
================================================================================
Tyrone M. Pierce writes:
2> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
2> No ... you wouldn't want to post any personal information. None of the
2> above was personal.
2> Seconds for KotM?
3> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
3> No shit, Shirley. ;->
3> You posted your responses containing information about what
3> he wrote to you.
3> Me? Damn ... your projector is powerful enough to show "One Flew Over The
3> Cuckoo's Nest" to all of Kansas without a bad seat in the house!
What does that have to do with OS/2, Pierce?
================================================================================
Meat Plow writes:
15> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
15> [*]
15> Denied, sockpuppet noms are not permitted.
16> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
16> Don't recall seeing the nym.
17> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
17> Certainly! Good call.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Plow?
================================================================================
Phineas T Puddleduck writes:
219> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
219> Just after Painius vents his spleen?
220> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
220> This particular dropping is one of Bills finest, up there with Painius
220> insisting EM radiation is a pressure wave.
221> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
221> He's certainly in fine form campaigning this month.... The fact he comes up
221> with this drivel is hilarious, he is utterly obsessed.
222> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
222> What the hell are you blathering on about now?
222> Einstein never said space was a fluid.
223> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
223> Great backpedal. Any faster there would be smoke.
224> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
224> More backpedalling?
225> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
225> I see you've given up trying even to produce an equation!
226> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
226> Is this really the best you have left? Back to evasion.
227> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
227> Like any mass generates one.
228> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
228> Range != strength.
229> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
229> So is em a pressure wave?
230> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
230> And here's Painsnuh, back to form with the lames when he cannot answer any
230> questions.
230> Prepare for a major froth out, and then a declaration he has to go away again.
231> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
231> "Don't ask - just believe. Dissenting evidence is wrong"
231> And *they* call modern science neo-geocentrism ;-)
232> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
232> More backpedalling!
233> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
233> Funny how he now calls up radiation pressure to his side, when not too long ago
233> when I was detailing the processes during a SN explosion he refused to admit
233> that radiation pressure was part of the hydrostatic equilibrium that was
233> disturbed when Fe fusion starts.....
233> Picks and chooses the physics he uses.
234> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
234> He reminds me of a goldfish in some respects. He's been told several times
234> there is no concrete evidence for a Sirius C - yet continues to blather on
234> about it.
234> He'd make a great Propaganda Minister for Frooty.
235> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
235> He ISNT thwarting the inverse square you maroon.
236> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
236> Back to lames.... A sure sign painsnuh's science is pretty thin.
237> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
237> Double-A really is the worst of the bunch. And they're a BAD bunch too.
237> No wonder Bill is proud of being uneducated.
238> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
238> More painsnuh nonsense.
238> But yet Painsnuh doesn't believe in QM or GR, so why should he care.
239> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
239> We've gone several times over how mass distributions generate equations of
239> motions from the Lagrangian Painsnuh. The Lagrangian method is a pretty well
239> know method say it comes from
239> L = T - V
239> Oh Painsnuh, you are nearly funny.
240> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
240> He's building a house of cards without even bothering with the ground level,
240> and wonders why every card he places flutters to the floor.
241> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
241> His meanderings on gravity versus the strong force are a joy to behold, its
241> like pure 100% proof idiocy.
242> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
242> I think so. I mean, compare him to Baghdad Bob, they have (had) the same denial
242> of reality field generator....
243> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
243> And then try to do anonymous revenge nom's.
244> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
244> He's just use Painius's Law:
244> "Any declaration can be declared true if one refuses to acknowledge any
244> information which renders it false".
245> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
245> Tries to talk about non-thermal mechanisms by using thermal mechanisms too.
245> Notice Bill now claims this medium/fluid is a collection of waves, and now
245> associates a *temperature* to it.
245> How does one define the temperature of a wave, Bill?
246> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
246> More silence on the hollow sphere - plus another thought.
246> Gauss's law says that the gravity from a massive sphere is as if all mass is
246> concentrated at the centre, right? I can't see how this model will gel with
246> Gauss's law in this respect.
247> Newsgroups: alt.alien.research,alt.alien.visitors,alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
247> Poor Hagar is stuck in a rut now. Attack the Boner and piss off the
247> Saucerheads, or give up his integrity and fall into line.
247> Will his pyjama's be worth it?
248> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
248> Thanks. Having someone else second nom's for a.a. means the little saucerheads
248> can't start their usual crap about me.
248> We they will, but they'll have to come up with me forgetting a full stop, or an
248> apostrophe in the wrong place.
249> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
249> Bill can't see them when he's that up high on his pedestal.
250> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
250> Especially for an irregular mass.
251> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
251> Nice catch.
252> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,comp.os.os2.advocacy
252> The irresistible slurp is meeting the immovable kook.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Puddleduck?
================================================================================
Henry Schmidt writes:
40> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
40> Still whining about yer busted out mangina. Rhonda was rough on that
40> thing with the plunger handle, eh?
41> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
41> yer jizz craziness is hard to not laugh at.
41> Yer still projecting to save yer fragile psyche, eh?
42> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
42> Loonel eats Kangaroo everyday.
43> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,aus.photo
43> If She keeps on mouthing off to you send her over to
43> RagingHomo/NYCKiddieF*cker.
What does any of that have to do with OS/2, Schmidt?
================================================================================
snuhwo...@hotmail.com writes:
5> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,alt.usenet.kooks,sci.electronics.basics,alt.flame,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.snuh
5> He may have fallen asleap...
What does that have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf5150?
================================================================================
rick_...@hotmail.com writes:
1> Newsgroups: sci.physics,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> Are you joking? lol
1> Tyrone Powers never had as many girlfriends as I do and he was quite
1> the ladies man.
What does that have to do with OS/2, sobie?
================================================================================
mrs.turtoni writes:
2> Newsgroups: soc.singles,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy
2> Mike would need a ladder reach Steve's neck.
What does that have to do with OS/2, turtoni?
================================================================================
Uncle Zed writes:
1> Newsgroups: alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.autos.mini,comp.os.os2.advocacy
1> The strongest force in nature, are my farts.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Zed?
Art Deco
Classic "oar pin" Tholenator(tm), <tho...@antispam.ham> tholed:
>Art Deco writes:
An operator needs to reboot the Tholenator, it is stuck in a loop:
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
>
>I see that you forgot to replace your placeholder with some imaginary
>patent, Deco.
>
>What was allegedly multi-posted, Deco? Still suffering from reading
>comprehension problems, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
>
>Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
>
>I'm well aware that your screed is in, Deco. No need to tell me about
>it.
>
>Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>Who is "Davie", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, Deco?
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
>I'm well aware that you posted more spam, Deco. No need to tell me
>about it.
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Deco?
>
Well done, OCD-boi, all nicely formated and in alphabetical order too.
>Phil Kyle writes:
>
>
>What does that have to do with classical music, Kyle?
>
>ah writes:
>
>Hypocritically, you didn't take it to email, ah. No surprise
>there, really.
>
>TheBookman writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, TheBookman?
>
>chatnoir writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, chatnoir?
>
>Terrence Cooter writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2 or singles, Cooter?
>
>The Demon Prince of Absurdity writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Demon? Interesting that Deco
>hasn't said anything about your 160+ line signature.
>
>dizzy writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
>
>John Fereira writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Fereira?
>
>Hagar writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Hagar?
>
>honestjohn writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, honestjohn?
>
>Kali writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Kali?
>
>Crash Street Kidd writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Kidd?
>
>Rhonda Lea Kirk writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Kirk?
>
>Lionel writes:
>
>What does any of that have to do with OS/2 or singles, Lionel?
>
>Sean Monaghan writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Monaghan?
>
>oldco...@sbcglobal.net writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, oldcoot?
>
>Painius writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Painius?
>
>Tyrone M. Pierce writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Pierce?
>
>Meat Plow writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Plow?
>
>Phineas T Puddleduck writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Puddleduck?
>
>Henry Schmidt writes:
>
>What does any of that have to do with OS/2, Schmidt?
>
>snuhwo...@hotmail.com writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, snuhwolf5150?
>
>rick_...@hotmail.com writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, sobie?
>
>mrs.turtoni writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, turtoni?
>
>Uncle Zed writes:
>
>What does that have to do with OS/2, Zed?
Tholen ... must ... digest ...
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
ah
No ... suprise ... there ... really ...
Phil Kyle
I feel so...bloated.
--
Phil Kyle
1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
Art Deco
Joe Malloy
his pure unadulterated grade F crummy crappy claptrap. Sheesh, what
must Tholen have done to earn so much derision from so many people!
Stay tuned to see if he can break 4,000 lines!
tho...@antispam.ham
wall" Joseph Malloy writes:
237> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
237> tho...@antispam.ham tholed,
What was allegedly endured while writing, Malloy?
237> like a wounded weasel,
Illogical, given that weasels do not write, Malloy.
237> some 3,723 lines of his pure unadulterated grade F crummy crappy
237> claptrap.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Malloy? That was
mostly Art Deco's "grade F crummy crappy claptrap", Malloy.
237> Sheesh, what must Tholen have done to earn so much derision from
237> so many people!
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Malloy? Most of
the non-Art Deco traffic is from people responding to Art Deco, and
then responding to each other.
237> Stay tuned to see if he can break 4,000 lines!
Are you planning to post something that long, Malloy, so that it can
be included in the next digest?
At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
know what he's talking about:
"me: 'Do you have Os/2?'
them: 'What's ohh-esstu, dude?'
me: 'Beats me.'"
--Joe Malloy
Still waiting for a response to:
Q: Who was ignored for the better part of two years but continued to
harass the person ignoring him, going to the extent of seeking out
postings made by that person in other newsgroups for purposes of
exporting that harassment to those other newsgroups?
A: Malloy.
Q: Who is a non-OS/2 user harassing an OS/2 user in an OS/2 newsgroup?
A: Malloy.
Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
inconsistency.
Also rather hypocritical of you to waste electrons by posting, Malloy.
I see that you didn't bother to answer several questions, Malloy. No
surprise there, really.
"Man sagt: Sie sind ein Misanthrop!"
--Joe Malloy, plagiarist
Art Deco
>mostly Art Deco's "grade F crummy crappy claptrap", Malloy.
>the non-Art Deco traffic is from people responding to Art Deco, and
>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
Can you write a post without including my name?
Phil Kyle
wrote:
Full stop...key....wearing....out
Art Deco
Joe Malloy
> 237> tho...@antispam.ham tholed, like a wounded weasel,
>
> Illogical, given that weasels do not write, Malloy.
Sure they do, witness the response you provided me with. QED.
Art Deco
>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>know what he's talking about:
What does this have to do with local demons?
>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>
>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
...obsession.
dizzy
Do you suppose that most astrologers are "weasels"?
tho...@antispam.ham
> Joe Malloy wrote:
>> tho...@antispam.ham tholed:
What does your question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
At least this time you didn't make a complete fool of yourself by
asking about audio editing software:
"For digitizing LP's?"
--dizzy
"What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
--dizzy
"Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
tholen."
--dizzy
Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
removal is only for LPs.
Art Deco
Whine much?
ah
> You-know-who wrote:
>
>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>know what he's talking about:
>
> What does this have to do with local demons?
OT. thx
>
>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>
>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>
> ...obsession.
Yup.
Art Deco
jmalloy
Certainly astrologers employed by an alleged "academic" institution in
Hawaii are.
tho...@antispam.ham
wall" Joseph Malloy writes:
239> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
239> Certainly astrologers employed by an alleged "academic" institution in
239> Hawaii are.
What does that have to do with OS/2, Malloy?
Art Deco
[nothing worth opening]
dizzy
I suspect that the field of Astrology attracts a lot of kooks and
weasels.
Phil Kyle
Phil Kyle
wrote:
>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> You-know-who wrote:
>>>
>>>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>>>know what he's talking about:
>>>
>>> What does this have to do with local demons?
>>
>>OT. thx
>>
>>>
>>>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>>>
>>>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>>>
>>> ...obsession.
>>
>>Yup.
>
>Yup.
Yup.
--
Phil Kyle
1st Lt. Old Skool Death Squad
May Your Sigs Be Long and Preposterous.
tho...@antispam.ham
> jmalloy wrote:
>> dizzy wrote:
>>> Joe Malloy wrote:
>>>> tho...@antispam.ham tholed:
What does your suspicion have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
Art Deco
>dizzy writes:
>At least this time you didn't make a complete fool of yourself by
>asking about audio editing software:
>
> "For digitizing LP's?"
> --dizzy
>
> "What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
> --dizzy
>
> "Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
> tholen."
> --dizzy
>
>Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
>removal is only for LPs.
How many more times are you going post this exact same copy-and-paste?
Art Deco
>On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:02:38 -0600, Art Deco <er...@caballista.org>
>wrote:
>
>>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>> You-know-who wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>>>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>>>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>>>>know what he's talking about:
>>>>
>>>> What does this have to do with local demons?
>>>
>>>OT. thx
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>>>>
>>>>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>>>>
>>>> ...obsession.
>>>
>>>Yup.
>>
>>Yup.
>
>Yup.
Yup.
Art Deco
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>>
>> I suspect that the field of Astrology attracts a lot of kooks and
>> weasels.
>
>What does your suspicion have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
Would you say that a lot of your colleagues are kooks, tholen?
Well, you wouldn't, would you.
tho...@antispam.ham
> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
>>> I suspect that the field of Astrology attracts a lot of kooks and
>>> weasels.
>> What does your suspicion have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
> Would you say that a lot of your colleagues are kooks, tholen?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
> Well, you wouldn't, would you.
I see that you didn't answer the question, dizzy. No surprise there,
really.
At least this time you didn't make a complete fool of yourself by
asking about audio editing software:
"For digitizing LP's?"
--dizzy
"What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
--dizzy
"Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
tholen."
--dizzy
Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
removal is only for LPs.
Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
Art Deco
>I see that you didn't answer the question, dizzy. No surprise there,
>really.
>
>At least this time you didn't make a complete fool of yourself by
>asking about audio editing software:
>
> "For digitizing LP's?"
> --dizzy
>
> "What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
> --dizzy
>
> "Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
> tholen."
> --dizzy
>
>Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
>removal is only for LPs.
>
>Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
Why do you post the same words over and over?
jmalloy
>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>
> Why do you post the same words over and over?
Tholen can't think of anything better to say, Deco. Pity Tholen!
Art Deco
tho...@antispam.ham
wall" Joseph Malloy writes:
240> Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.advocacy
240> Tholen can't think of anything better to say, Deco.
How ironic, coming from someone who can't think of anything better to
do with his time than to harass an OS/2 user in an OS/2 newsgroup.
240> Pity Tholen!
How ironic, coming from someone who should to be pitied for his
obsession.
At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
know what he's talking about:
"me: 'Do you have Os/2?'
them: 'What's ohh-esstu, dude?'
me: 'Beats me.'"
--Joe Malloy
Still waiting for a response to:
Q: Who was ignored for the better part of two years but continued to
harass the person ignoring him, going to the extent of seeking out
postings made by that person in other newsgroups for purposes of
exporting that harassment to those other newsgroups?
A: Malloy.
Q: Who is a non-OS/2 user harassing an OS/2 user in an OS/2 newsgroup?
A: Malloy.
Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
dizzy
>
>>tholen tholed:
>>>
>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>>
>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
Because it's kooky, of course.
tho...@antispam.ham
>> Art Deco asked:
>>> tholen tholed:
Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
over and over, dizzy.
Art Deco
>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>inconsistency.
There is an old story about people who keep banging their heads against
brick walls.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
ah
Yup.
Art Deco
>Art Deco wrote:
>> Phil Kyle <philky...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:02:38 -0600, Art Deco <er...@caballista.org>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> You-know-who wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>>>>>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>>>>>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>>>>>>know what he's talking about:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does this have to do with local demons?
>>>>>
>>>>>OT. thx
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...obsession.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yup.
>>>>
>>>>Yup.
>>>
>>>Yup.
>>
>> Yup.
>
>Yup.
Yup.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
Phil Kyle
wrote:
Morits...surely...to...follow...
Phil Kyle
wrote:
>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>> Phil Kyle <philky...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:02:38 -0600, Art Deco <er...@caballista.org>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>>> You-know-who wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>>>>>>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>>>>>>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>>>>>>>know what he's talking about:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What does this have to do with local demons?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>OT. thx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...obsession.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yup.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yup.
>>>>
>>>>Yup.
>>>
>>> Yup.
>>
>>Yup.
>
>Yup.
Yup.
Phil Kyle
>Art Deco wrote:
>> Phil Kyle <philky...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 19:02:38 -0600, Art Deco <er...@caballista.org>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Art Deco wrote:
>>>>>> You-know-who wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At least this time you didn't stupidly deny having written "Tholeln"
>>>>>>>in a subject line prior to a particular date, Malloy. Of course,
>>>>>>>you're the one who likes to portray himself as someone who doesn't
>>>>>>>know what he's talking about:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does this have to do with local demons?
>>>>>
>>>>>OT. thx
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Obsession: thy name is Malloy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>131 postings from Deco, and not a peep from Malloy about them. Classic
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...obsession.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yup.
>>>>
>>>>Yup.
>>>
>>>Yup.
>>
>> Yup.
>
>Yup.
Yup.
ah
Yup.
ah
What . . . a . . . gas . . . .
Art Deco
Feeling ... so ... cold ...
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
Art Deco
Yup.
ah
Got . . . so . . . old . . . .
ah
Yup.
Art Deco
Yup.
Art Deco
The ... darkness ... is ... everywhere ...
Phil Kyle
No...time...for...jokes...
Phil Kyle
Whiter...whites....with...bold
Phil Kyle
Yup.
Art Deco
Yup.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
Art Deco
Must ... find ... the ... door ...
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>>> Art Deco asked:
>
>>>> tholen tholed:
>
>>>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>
>>>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
>
>> Because it's kooky, of course.
>
>Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
>over and over, dizzy.
Wrong again, tholen. The "tholen tholed" is an attribution, expected
at the top of all usenet posts. This is not comparable to your kooky
repetitious tholes.
tho...@antispam.ham
> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
>>>> Art Deco asked:
>>>>> tholen tholed:
>>>>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>>>>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
>>> Because it's kooky, of course.
>> Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
>> over and over, dizzy.
> Wrong again, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> The "tholen tholed" is an attribution,
It's the same words posted over and over, dizzy, an action that you
described as "kooky". You painted yourself into a corner with your
own words, dizzy, and now you're desperately trying to wriggle your
way out of that corner.
> expected at the top of all usenet posts.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Some USENET posts start
new threads, dizzy, and therefore have no quoted text that can be
attributed to a previous poster. Of course, you would know that by
now if you had better reading comprehension skills, dizzy.
> This is not comparable to your kooky repetitious tholes.
Non sequitur. There has been no discussion of oar pins, dizzy.
Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dizzy?
Unfortunately for you, dizzy, this time you did make as complete a
fool of yourself as you did when you asked about audio editing
software:
"For digitizing LP's?"
--dizzy
"What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
--dizzy
"Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
tholen."
--dizzy
Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
removal is only for LPs.
Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
Art Deco
>dizzy writes:
>
>> tholen tholed:
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
This one has to be your most over-used lame.
>
>>>>> Art Deco asked:
>
>>>>>> tholen tholed:
>
>>>>>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>
>>>>>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
>
>>>> Because it's kooky, of course.
>
>>> Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
>>> over and over, dizzy.
>
>> Wrong again, tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
What's up with this? You left the previous content intact.
Lora
<tho...@antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:4637c286$0$5758$4c36...@roadrunner.com...
> dizzy writes:
>
> > tholen tholed:
>
> What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
>
dizzy?
Obsession is not pretty.
dizzy
><tho...@antispam.ham> wrote:
>>
>> dizzy writes:
>>>
>>> tholen tholed:
>>
>> What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
>
>dizzy?
Lora?
>Obsession is not pretty.
What does that to do with OS/2, Lora?
dizzy
>dizzy writes:
>
>> tholen tholed:
>
>What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
A bad horoscope?
>>>>> Art Deco asked:
>
>>>>>> tholen tholed:
>
>>>>>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>
>>>>>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
>
>>>> Because it's kooky, of course.
>
>>> Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
>>> over and over, dizzy.
>
>> Wrong again, tholen.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholen.
>> The "tholen tholed" is an attribution,
>
>It's the same words posted over and over, dizzy, an action that you
>described as "kooky". You painted yourself into a corner with your
>own words, dizzy, and now you're desperately trying to wriggle your
>way out of that corner.
See, tholen, the above proves that you don't have to be repetitious to
be kooky.
>> expected at the top of all usenet posts.
>
>Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Some USENET posts start
>new threads, dizzy, and therefore have no quoted text that can be
>attributed to a previous poster.
I'm impressed, tholen. You actually got me on a point. A trivial,
inconsequential, kooky point, but a point, nonetheless.
Unfortunately for you, tholen, my point remains I use "tholen tholed"
as an attribution. This is not comparable to your kooky repetitious
tholes, tholen.
>Of course, you would know that by
>now if you had better reading comprehension skills, dizzy.
Illogical, tholen.
>> This is not comparable to your kooky repetitious tholes.
>
>Non sequitur. There has been no discussion of oar pins, dizzy.
Classic evasion of the point.
>Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dizzy?
Never have, tholen. I find it rather ironic that you should ask,
though.
Phil Kyle
wrote:
But...the...light...is....so....inviting
Phil Kyle
Phil Kyle
tho...@antispam.ham
> tholen tholed:
What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
>>> tholen tholed:
>> What was allegedly endured while writing, dizzy?
> A bad horoscope?
What does your question have to do with OS/2, dizzy?
>>>>>> Art Deco asked:
>>>>>>> tholen tholed:
>>>>>>>> Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
>>>>>>> Why do you post the same words over and over?
>>>>> Because it's kooky, of course.
>>>> Which explains why you keep posting the same "tholen tholed" words
>>>> over and over, dizzy.
>>> Wrong again, tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On your part, tholen.
Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> The "tholen tholed" is an attribution,
>> It's the same words posted over and over, dizzy, an action that you
>> described as "kooky". You painted yourself into a corner with your
>> own words, dizzy, and now you're desperately trying to wriggle your
>> way out of that corner.
> See, tholen, the above proves that you don't have to be repetitious to
> be kooky.
Your behavior above does indeed prove that you don't have to be
repetitious to be kooky, dizzy.
>>> expected at the top of all usenet posts.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Some USENET posts start
>> new threads, dizzy, and therefore have no quoted text that can be
>> attributed to a previous poster.
> I'm impressed, tholen. You actually got me on a point.
Glad you agree, dizzy.
> A trivial, inconsequential, kooky point, but a point, nonetheless.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Unfortunately for you, tholen, my point remains I use "tholen tholed"
> as an attribution.
Unfortunately for you, dizzy, it's the same words posted over and over,
regardless of how you use them, an action that you described as "kooky".
You painted yourself into a corner with your own words, dizzy, and now
you're desperately trying to wriggle your way out of that corner.
> This is not comparable to your kooky repetitious tholes, tholen.
Classic erroneous presupposition. No oar pins are involved, dizzy.
>> Of course, you would know that by
>> now if you had better reading comprehension skills, dizzy.
> Illogical, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> This is not comparable to your kooky repetitious tholes.
>> Non sequitur. There has been no discussion of oar pins, dizzy.
> Classic evasion of the point.
I'm well aware that you've been trying to evade the point about your
kooky repetitious use of the same words, dizzy. No need to tell me
about it.
>> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, dizzy?
> Never have, tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I find it rather ironic that you should ask, though.
Where is the alleged irony, dizzy?
At least this time you didn't make a complete fool of yourself by
asking about audio editing software:
"For digitizing LP's?"
--dizzy
"What is the 'pop removal' for, if not for LP's, tholen?"
--dizzy
"Appearently you don't know that I'm an electrical engineer,
tholen."
--dizzy
Some electrical engineer you are, dizzy, given that you think pop
removal is only for LPs.
Of course, it's hard to think straight when you're dizzy.
Art Deco
>> Unfortunately for you, tholen, my point remains I use "tholen tholed"
>> as an attribution.
>
>Unfortunately for you, dizzy, it's the same words posted over and over,
Oh the irony.
Art Deco
Yup.
Art Deco
Phil Kyle
Art Deco
Phil Kyle
wrote:
Nothing...to...see...here...
Art Deco
Phil Kyle
Art Deco
ah
Yup.
Art Deco
Yup.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
--Kali, quoted endlessly by David Tholen as evidence of "something"
ah
Yup.
ah
Until ... you ... don't ... need ... it ....
ah
Pardon . . . ?
Phil Kyle
news:46483bc6$0$4843$8f2e...@news.shared-secrets.com:
Yup.
--
P
h
i
l
K
y
l
e
W
o
z
E
r
e
Art Deco
Yup.
Art Deco
I ... can ... almost ... see ... the ... tower ...
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
"Of doing Venus in person would obviously incorporate a composite
rigid airship, along with it's internal cache of frozen pizza and
ice cold beer."
-- Brad Guth, bigoted racist
"You really are one of the litsiest people I know, Mr. Deco."
Phil Kyle
Phil Kyle
None...for...ages...then...three...appear...at...once...
Art Deco
The ... horses ... are ... gone ...
Art Deco
Yup.
ah
Said ... the ... jumper ... to ... the ... leaf ....
Art Deco
Almost ... out ... of ... periods ...
Phil Kyle
Must ... be ... the ... menopause ...
Phil Kyle
ah
Yup.
ah
Menarch ... is ... a .... dirty ... business ....
Art Deco
Where ... is ... my ... dictionary ...