duke <
duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
>On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 23:43:01 -0700 (PDT), hypatiab7 <
hypa...@comcast.net>
>>On Sunday, October 7, 2012 3:05:22 PM UTC-4, duke wrote:
>>> On Sun, 07 Oct 2012 11:35:00 +0100, Les <l...@sharnt.tell> wrote:
>>>>On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 07:56:05 +0000 (UTC), Kelsey Bjarnason
>>>><
kbjar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Sat, 06 Oct 2012 14:40:29 +0000, Fred^2 wrote:
>>>>>>
http://theconversation.edu.au/no-youre-not-entitled-to-your-opinion-9978
>>>>>> When it comes to science, rightards don't get to have an opinion.
True. That's not to say that rightarded Christianics can't openb their
yippers and expose their Republican IQs for all to see, they still have
free speech despite their Christanic efforts to silence free speech,
yet when it comes to matters of science, rightarded opinions are dismissed.
>>>>>I always liked "You're entitled to your own opinion; you are not entitled
>>>>>to your own facts."
>>>>An opinion is only as good as the evidence that supports it
>>> And we have evidence galore for the existence of God.
>>> It's so strong, there > is no other reality.
>>Yet in almost 13 years, you've never presented one drop of evidence
>>and never will.
>Of course I have - many, many times. But people like you stuff your head in the
>ground so you can't hear it.
If the insane cultists had evidence for any of their gods and
goddesses, the insane cultists would have provided it long ago.
The fact that they can't speaks volumes about the lunacy of
cult savages.