=============================================
I'm happy for you Chris, but personally I find long filenames a royal
pain in the rear and wish that nobody ever though of it. But then,
I'm a real DOS buff and a strict constructionist. If you can't do it
with 8 letters and a 3 letter extension, then you can't do it.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE... INCLUDE MY MESSAGE WITH YOUR REPLY
(WHA?)
o
o
''~``
( o o )
+------------.oooO--(_)--Oooo.--------------+
Bernie
Ber...@home.com
Baltimore .oooO
( ) Oooo.
+----------------------\ (----( )------------------------+
\_) ) /
(_/
I am partially agree with you Bernie, but Win9x is so widely invaded
the world that we can not avoid using its specific features. If you
have to transfer large amount of Word's files with VLFN (Very Long
Filenames :-) to other machine, possibility to do it with PKZIP is
not bad idea, isn't it? Anyway, people are glad, as we can see.
Regards,
Artur Yelchishchev
(also DOS-thinking man).
Try to download this PKZIP. ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/msdos/arcers/pk250dos.exe 207394 bytes
Joseph Chia
Tel 7906072 (office)
Joseph is my baptised christian name.
Truth gives knowledge. Lies give nothing.
It is better to get hurt now by knowing the truth
than getting hurt badly and deeply later by lies
Problem can only be solved by evidence and experience one had and not by any reason. Reason without the correct evidence cannot be taken as right and true
----------
From: ber...@home.com (Bernie)[SMTP:ber...@home.com]
Posted At: Monday, April 05, 1999 4:21 AM
Posted To: misc
Conversation: Finally! PKZIP long filenames in DOS
Subject: Re: Finally! PKZIP long filenames in DOS
On Sun, 4 Apr 1999 20:03:27 +0100, "Chris Jones"
>I don't know if you've noticed, but PKWARE have finally released PKZIP 2.50
>for DOS, supporting long filenames in a DOS box in Win95. This means you can
>unzip files from a DOS prompt, whilst maintaining their long names. I think
>it's great news, as we've been waiting for this for ages.
=============================================
I'm happy for you Chris, but personally I find long filenames a royal
pain in the rear and wish that nobody ever though of it. But then,
I'm a real DOS buff and a strict constructionist. If you can't do it
with 8 letters and a 3 letter extension, then you can't do it.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE... INCLUDE MY MESSAGE WITH YOUR REPLY
I have already emailed PKWARE to express my disappontment after all these
months of waiting.
Actually ... PKZIP250 only works in a Windows shell-out to DOS. It
does not work in the REAL world of DOS. Keep waiting. However, there
has appeared lately a diskedit program called DEDIT32.EXE which does
indeed do its things in real DOS. Not the same or any relation to our
subject, but just a mention that somebody has been truly thinking.
One use would be to doctor deleted files back into visibility again.
--
Flame away thou foul-tongued varlets! Though, I weareth sheetiron
skivvees betwixt asbestos layering, mine own arse indeed remaineth
yet frostee!.. The Righteous Knight, Act 2 Sc 2, Gilburt & Sulliven
>Bernie wrote:
>>
>> "Chris Jones" <ch...@mynos.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> >I don't know if you've noticed, but PKWARE have finally released PKZIP 2.50
>> >for DOS, supporting long filenames in a DOS box in Win95. This means you can
>> >unzip files from a DOS prompt, whilst maintaining their long names. I think
>> >it's great news, as we've been waiting for this for ages.
>>
>> I'm happy for you Chris, but personally I find long filenames a royal
>> pain in the rear and wish that nobody ever though of it. But then,
>> I'm a real DOS buff and a strict constructionist. If you can't do it
>> with 8 letters and a 3 letter extension, then you can't do it.
S.NAP
>> PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE... INCLUDE MY MESSAGE WITH YOUR REPLY
>Actually ... PKZIP250 only works in a Windows shell-out to DOS. It
>does not work in the REAL world of DOS. Keep waiting. However, there
DAMN.
>has appeared lately a diskedit program called DEDIT32.EXE which does
>indeed do its things in real DOS. Not the same or any relation to our
Ah, but can it DEDIT32.EXE NTFS partitions when booted with DOS ?
>subject, but just a mention that somebody has been truly thinking.
>One use would be to doctor deleted files back into visibility again.
Thought not,
S.NAPper
-- -
Stuff the B's - Show Me the Honey !
Infozip supports LFNs under Win95 and works fine in DOS mode. See:
ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/pub/infozip/index.html
Yes, but it does not read or write LFN's when running in REAL MODE
DOS - only in a DOS window or session under Windows - because it relies
upon Windows 9x to supply the extra file naming functions. The problem is,
if you use a DOS LFN extension like Chris' LFNDOS or Digital Research's
longname.exe, it _still_ will not read or write LFN's in real mode. THAT
is the Holy Grail.
| > >Actually ... PKZIP250 only works in a Windows shell-out to DOS. It
| > >does not work in the REAL world of DOS. Keep waiting. However, there
|
| Infozip supports LFNs under Win95 and works fine in DOS mode. See:
| ftp://ftp.cdrom.com/pub/infozip/index.html
While it looks like a great product, if you read the following quote form
Infozip's question and answer page, you'll find Infozip can't support LFN from
pure DOS any more than any of the other archive programs.
-------------------------------------
How do I extract Windows 95/98 long filenames (VFAT) under plain DOS? It works
fine in a Win9x DOS window, but I want to be able to restore a backed-up Win9x
system from scratch.
You're hosed. Info-ZIP's utilities use the normal C library functions to read
and write files; those functions, in turn, depend on the operating system to
provide file-system support. Plain DOS, even the DOS 7.0 at the heart of
Windows 9x, does not support the VFAT or FAT32 file systems. And writing very
low-level, OS-dependent code to support one system violates Info-ZIP's goal of
maximal portability (even if most of the necessary code is already freely
available in Linux and elsewhere).
So while Info-ZIP's Win32 versions do support long filenames in Win9x DOS
boxes, they don't even run under plain DOS. And the DOS versions don't support
long filenames at all. (Well, that's not entirely true: if UnZip is compiled
with the free djgpp 2.x compiler, it will support long filenames under Windows
95/98 [not NT] or short filenames under plain DOS. The currently available
32-bit executable in unz540x3.exe was compiled with djgpp 2.x.)
Your best bet is to hope that someone writes (or maybe has already written) a
VFAT/FAT32 device driver for DOS, similar to the OS/2 HPFS device drivers
already available for DOS (e.g., HPFS-Access, Amos, etc.). If you hear about
such a thing, let us know and we'll provide pointers and, if possible, test
our code with it. In the meantime, Duncan Murdoch's DOSLFNBK and LFNSORT
utilities may prove useful.
(Shameless plug below:)
There's a new version of my LFNDOS, v1.05, now available which now supports
PKZIP/PKUNZIP 2.50 (although there are a couple of bugs with PKUNZIP -d
currently). http://members.xoom.com/dosuser
Chris Jones
I know. I just didn't realise that PKWARE had released a DOS version
of PKZIP 2.50. The WIN32 command line version I tested a few months
ago had an awful command line syntax and didn't run at all in DOS
mode (that's why I switched to InfoZip).
207394 Mar 1 1999 ftp://garbo.uwasa.fi/pc/arcers/pk250dos.exe
pk250dos.exe PKWARE zip un/archiver, with long filename support
All the best, Timo
....................................................................
Prof. Timo Salmi Co-moderator of news:comp.archives.msdos.announce
Moderating at ftp:// & http://garbo.uwasa.fi/ archives 193.166.120.5
Department of Accounting and Business Finance ; University of Vaasa
mailto:t...@uwasa.fi <http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/> ; FIN-65101, Finland
Spam foiling in effect. My email filter autoresponder will return a
required email password to users not yet in the privileges database.
Advice on spam foiling at http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts/info/spamfoil.html
My original post did say "PKZIP 2.50 for DOS" :-)
btw: LHA has always supportes Long File names
-------------------------------
http://oak.oakland.edu/simtel.net/
arcers/
pk250dos.exe 207394 990402 PKZIP 2.50 for dos from pkware
-------------------------------
--
=-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
al aab, seders moderator sed u soon
it is not zat we do not see the s o l u t i o n
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
It was only a matter of time...
--
Merci.........................Yvan If you have no sense of humour,
e-mail: BQ...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA you should learn to laugh about it!
This has already been posted on this thread twice, once by Joseph
(05/Apr/99), and again by Timo Salmi (11/Apr/99). I think we all know by now
where to get it from.
...and I add my brilliant observation:
So .. what was your point, Chris? Spending too much time online maybe?
--
Men are from right here and now. Women are from way the hell over there.
I created a zip file using these commands
pkzip -r file.zip c:\folder\*.*
And I want to restore now the data with the full path with the command
pkunzip -d file.zip
and I got no success!!!
ONE YEAR OF WORK MAYBE LOST!!!!
PLEASE HELP ME.....
Is there a way I can do that?
I work at a Petroleum Company here in Rio de Janeiro - Brazil and we used the
ZIP 2.04G DOS evaluation
PLEASE....PLEASE...PLEASE.....HELP ME !!!!!!
>
-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
I think you know what my point was: Al should have read the thread through
before posting something which was already there. Although I must give him
credit for actually replying in the thread instead of posting a new message
like he normally does.
>Spending too much time online maybe?
Personally, I don't think that the 10 minutes per day internet access I have
is too much. But maybe I spend too much time offline reading through the
newsgroups...
From online help (type pkzip with no arguments, or /? or /h) you will find
-p|P store Pathnames|p=recursed into|P=specified & recursed into
-r Recurse subdirectories
or for more details you can read the text manual in the distribution you'll
see
-r Recurse subdirectories
-rp Recurse subdirectories, preserve the path structure below
-rP Recurse subdirectories, preserve path structure specified and below
You have all the files stored, you just don't have the diretory structure
stored.
On Fri, 16 Apr 1999 16:20:05 GMT, fab...@ipiranga.com.br wrote:
| Hi, this is URGENT!!! please help me!!!!
| I created a zip file using these commands
| pkzip -r file.zip c:\folder\*.*
| And I want to restore now the data with the full path with the command
| pkunzip -d file.zip
| and I got no success!!!
|
| ONE YEAR OF WORK MAYBE LOST!!!!
| PLEASE HELP ME.....
<snip
| I work at a Petroleum Company here in Rio de Janeiro - Brazil and we used the
| ZIP 2.04G DOS evaluation
<snip>
As far as I am aware ( and I have just done a small test ) using the
recursion switch -r alone will add files from the specified directory
and sub-directories to the zip file but does not maintain the directory
structure. In addition if any of the file names in sub-directories are
duplicated then only the "top-most" file is added to the archive.
--
Richard Gledson, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
(ri...@rgledson.demon.co.uk)
You posted exactly the same posting to news:comp.archives.msdos.d
Please see the response in that newsgroup.