Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fooling DOS 7.xx (aka win9x) to run win 3.11

188 views
Skip to first unread message

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 5, 2001, 1:38:46 PM8/5/01
to
Hi,

I have installed on a separate harddisk WFW3.11.
Normally I boot with DOS 6.22 bootdisk, and then load windows.

Booting from my main drive, loads dos 7.xx (win9x). It is impossible
to start win3.11.

I have tried SETVER.EXE, to give "WIN.COM" a 6.22 version number, but
I diden't work.

Any suggestions ?, and thanks in advance !

Greetings,
Steven.
---
A White Sailboat...Raging Waters...A Golden Inca Temple...
And a Great Earthquake...A Giant Condor That Wheels In The Sky...
MCoG ..../// http://www.unity.force9.co.uk/mcog ///

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 5, 2001, 1:42:11 PM8/5/01
to
Steven V.A. schrieb:

>
> I have installed on a separate harddisk WFW3.11.
> Normally I boot with DOS 6.22 bootdisk, and then load windows.
>
> Booting from my main drive, loads dos 7.xx (win9x). It is impossible
> to start win3.11.
>
> I have tried SETVER.EXE, to give "WIN.COM" a 6.22 version number, but
> I diden't work.

Get osr2fix.exe. This file contains a fix for MS-DOS 7.10 (Win95OSR2,
Win98, Win98SE) that enables older Windows versions to run.

Stephan
--
Stephan Großklaß (7bit: Grossklass)
eMail: mailto:jgros...@t-online.de | Webmaster: http://www.i24.com/
Home: http://jgrossklass.bei.t-online.de/
P3-500, 128MB, 8+8+19GB HDD; MS-DOS 6.22, WfW 3.11, Calmira II 3.12

James Isaacs

unread,
Aug 6, 2001, 5:03:30 AM8/6/01
to
Most wisely Stephan Grossklass wrote:
>
> Steven V.A. schrieb:
> >
> > I have installed on a separate harddisk WFW3.11.
> > Normally I boot with DOS 6.22 bootdisk, and then load windows.
> >
> > Booting from my main drive, loads dos 7.xx (win9x). It is impossible
> > to start win3.11.

Rename WIN.COM for Win3.11 to 311.com, or living dangerously incorporate
a routine in you AUTOEXEC.BAT to CALL a batch file that swaps names or
extensions of WIN.COM to WIN.XXX and vice versa.


> >
> > I have tried SETVER.EXE, to give "WIN.COM" a 6.22 version number, but
> > I diden't work.

It is accurately WIN300.BIN not WIN.COM that is the thing you need to
SETVER

>
> Get osr2fix.exe. This file contains a fix for MS-DOS 7.10 (Win95OSR2,
> Win98, Win98SE) that enables older Windows versions to run.
>
> Stephan

My own experience here is that the Fix is imperfect, on a FAT32
partition it nearly always invokes Protected Mode and hard drive errors
on faster/newer systems. My best advice is to follow the method of
Steven V.A.

I would rather that the fix worked on every system, every time, it would
have saved me low level formatting on Friday.

PS to Stephan - every thing you have ever said is golden and true and I
would have been completely lost many times with out your posts here in
the group, grosse Danke!

James Isaacs

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 6, 2001, 4:20:08 PM8/6/01
to
Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>Get osr2fix.exe. This file contains a fix for MS-DOS 7.10 (Win95OSR2,
>Win98, Win98SE) that enables older Windows versions to run.

Ok I'll have a loo, I will post the results

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 6, 2001, 4:20:12 PM8/6/01
to
James Isaacs <jis...@marshall.edu> wrote:

>It is accurately WIN300.BIN not WIN.COM that is the thing you need to
>SETVER

Sorry, I can't find that file on my HD where win31x is installed :(
Did you mean win386.exe ? thayt's the closest I could find.

>My own experience here is that the Fix is imperfect, on a FAT32
>partition it nearly always invokes Protected Mode and hard drive errors
>on faster/newer systems. My best advice is to follow the method of
>Steven V.A.

Luckily wfw3.11 is installed on a different hard disk ("specimen from
the past" :) so I can try it out safely ....I intend to install all
related software on that drive too.

>I would rather that the fix worked on every system, every time, it would
>have saved me low level formatting on Friday.

That's no fun :(

>PS to Stephan - every thing you have ever said is golden and true and I
>would have been completely lost many times with out your posts here in
>the group, grosse Danke!

Couldn't agree more !

Greetings
Steven

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 8, 2001, 1:16:08 PM8/8/01
to
Steven V.A. <steven.v...@yucom.be> wrote:

>>Get osr2fix.exe. This file contains a fix for MS-DOS 7.10 (Win95OSR2,
>>Win98, Win98SE) that enables older Windows versions to run.
>
>Ok I'll have a loo, I will post the results

^^^
Now, If I learned to type properly :-)

Well, it works. However:

1) I can't enable 32bit disk access
2) sometimes directories look scrambled ( a reboot fixed that - i read
the instructions !)

Note that wfw is placed on a different hd:

C: FAT32 DOS7.xx (aka win98SE)
D: FAT16 WFW3.11

I tought sometimes your hard disk manufactures shipped a special
driver fro that... (?)

Greetings,
Steven

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 8, 2001, 1:54:21 PM8/8/01
to
Steven V.A. schrieb:

>
> >>Get osr2fix.exe. This file contains a fix for MS-DOS 7.10 (Win95OSR2,
> >>Win98, Win98SE) that enables older Windows versions to run.
> >
> >Ok I'll have a loo, I will post the results
> ^^^
> Now, If I learned to type properly :-)

Could it be you're not using a fixed pitch font? The underline is at
"wil", not "loo" (where it was obviously intended to be).

> Well, it works. However:
>
> 1) I can't enable 32bit disk access

*wdctrl only supports drives up to 504 MB - replacement FastDisk drivers
support up to 8 GB. But IMHO 32BDA isn't worth the hassle - the gain
resulting from it is usually in the region of zero, sometimes even
negative, plus enabling 32BDA caused COM port troubles here. BTW: Does
32 bit *file* access work?

> 2) sometimes directories look scrambled ( a reboot fixed that - i read
> the instructions !)

Well, I don't have any experience with the DOS 7.1 / WfW combo, so can't
tell you much about that.

> Note that wfw is placed on a different hd:
>
> C: FAT32 DOS7.xx (aka win98SE)
> D: FAT16 WFW3.11
>
> I tought sometimes your hard disk manufactures shipped a special
> driver fro that... (?)

Perhaps you thought of the FastDisk drivers I mentioned?

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 9, 2001, 1:20:55 PM8/9/01
to
Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>Could it be you're not using a fixed pitch font? The underline is at
>"wil", not "loo" (where it was obviously intended to be).

It would seem, since over here it looks fine...(on the right place)

>*wdctrl only supports drives up to 504 MB - replacement FastDisk drivers
>support up to 8 GB.

Yes, but it is installed on a HD wich is smaller then 504 MB...so I
suspect there is no limitation.

>But IMHO 32BDA isn't worth the hassle - the gain
>resulting from it is usually in the region of zero, sometimes even
>negative, plus enabling 32BDA caused COM port troubles here. BTW: Does
>32 bit *file* access work?

32 bit file access does actually work :-)
What do you suggest, since my drive does an awful lot of writing and
reading to start a program. Would "smartdrive" make this a bit better
? (it is after all, a disk caching program)


>> 2) sometimes directories look scrambled ( a reboot fixed that - i read
>> the instructions !)
>
>Well, I don't have any experience with the DOS 7.1 / WfW combo, so can't
>tell you much about that.

No damage was done to my data, so no problem..

>Perhaps you thought of the FastDisk drivers I mentioned?

Yes I think I was confused with that.
Thanks for pointing it out.

Greetings,
Steven.

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 9, 2001, 2:12:26 PM8/9/01
to
Steven V.A. schrieb:

>
> Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >Could it be you're not using a fixed pitch font? The underline is at
> >"wil", not "loo" (where it was obviously intended to be).
>
> It would seem, since over here it looks fine...(on the right place)

What font are you using? (Pop up the context menu on the message window;
there's a menu item "Fixed Pitch Font", this should be enabled. A
similar option is available for the compose window, as "Fixed pitch
font" in the Message menu; actually this is also available in Agent's
browser mode.)

> >*wdctrl only supports drives up to 504 MB - replacement FastDisk drivers
> >support up to 8 GB.
>
> Yes, but it is installed on a HD wich is smaller then 504 MB...so I
> suspect there is no limitation.

But your first hard drive is larger than that, isn't it?

> >But IMHO 32BDA isn't worth the hassle - the gain
> >resulting from it is usually in the region of zero, sometimes even
> >negative, plus enabling 32BDA caused COM port troubles here. BTW: Does
> >32 bit *file* access work?
>
> 32 bit file access does actually work :-)
> What do you suggest, since my drive does an awful lot of writing and
> reading to start a program. Would "smartdrive" make this a bit better
> ? (it is after all, a disk caching program)

If 32 bit file access works, a disk cache called VCache, which is much
more efficient than SmartDrive, is already used - if you have plenty of
RAM, I'd suggest 16384 KB as a cache size. Smartdrv is only needed for
floppies and CD-ROM drives. To see which drives are cached by VCache,
open the 386 Enhanced Control Panel applet and click on "Virtual
memory"; then you'll see if the BIOS or a FastDisk driver is used and if
32 bit file access on the various local hard drives is on (32 bit) or
off (16 bit).

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 10, 2001, 1:19:36 PM8/10/01
to
Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>What font are you using? (Pop up the context menu on the message window;
>there's a menu item "Fixed Pitch Font", this should be enabled.

I have enabled fixed Pitch font, and I now can see my mistake....
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
The line under the word enabled should be on the right place.

>But your first hard drive is larger than that, isn't it?

Indeed.

>floppies and CD-ROM drives. To see which drives are cached by VCache,
>open the 386 Enhanced Control Panel applet and click on "Virtual
>memory"; then you'll see if the BIOS or a FastDisk driver is used and if
>32 bit file access on the various local hard drives is on (32 bit) or
>off (16 bit).

Both drives (large and small) say 16bit, using BIOS.
32 bit file acces is checked, 32 bit disk acces is gray.

Anyway I loaded smartdrive. It gave a huge performance jump, so my
problem is (probably) solved.

BTW the system memory (128mb) isn't displayed properly in the "about"
box.

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 10, 2001, 1:31:36 PM8/10/01
to
Steven V.A. schrieb:

>
> Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> >What font are you using? (Pop up the context menu on the message window;
> >there's a menu item "Fixed Pitch Font", this should be enabled.
>
> I have enabled fixed Pitch font, and I now can see my mistake....
> ¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
> The line under the word enabled should be on the right place.

Actually, it's under "led fixed Pit". Perhaps you still have to change
the settings for the compose window?
^^^^^^^
("compose" should be underlined)

> Both drives (large and small) say 16bit, using BIOS.
> 32 bit file acces is checked, 32 bit disk acces is gray.

Since none of the drive seems to be using 32BFA, you can disable it.

> Anyway I loaded smartdrive. It gave a huge performance jump, so my
> problem is (probably) solved.

I'd give Smartdrv 8192 KB both for DOS and Windows - it consumes too
much space in the UMBs otherwise. Smartdrv should be loaded *after*
MSCDEX, BTW.

> BTW the system memory (128mb) isn't displayed properly in the "about"
> box.

To use all the memory, you'll need to use himem.sys from MS-DOS 7.0 or
higher (i.e. Windows 95/98). Then the box should display
<available_memory> + <pagefile> - <space_used_by_Windows_and_apps>

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 11, 2001, 4:02:55 AM8/11/01
to
Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>Actually, it's under "led fixed Pit". Perhaps you still have to change
>the settings for the compose window?
^^^^^^^

Yes, I forgot to change the compose window <g>
^^^^^^
Change has a line under it.

>Since none of the drive seems to be using 32BFA, you can disable it.

Yes, it diden't make any difference in performance.

>I'd give Smartdrv 8192 KB both for DOS and Windows - it consumes too
>much space in the UMBs otherwise. Smartdrv should be loaded *after*
>MSCDEX, BTW.

OK I'll configure it that way.

>To use all the memory, you'll need to use himem.sys from MS-DOS 7.0 or
>higher (i.e. Windows 95/98). Then the box should display
><available_memory> + <pagefile> - <space_used_by_Windows_and_apps>

I now use Himem of DOS7.1.
So it is logical to see a value that is greater than my total mermory
?
(I believe it said 250 Mb - so this is fine I can suppose)

Outsider

unread,
Aug 11, 2001, 6:12:21 AM8/11/01
to
Stephan Grossklass wrote:
>
>
> If 32 bit file access works, a disk cache called VCache, which is much
> more efficient than SmartDrive, is already used - if you have plenty of
> RAM, I'd suggest 16384 KB as a cache size. Smartdrv is only needed for
> floppies and CD-ROM drives. To see which drives are cached by VCache,
> open the 386 Enhanced Control Panel applet and click on "Virtual
> memory"; then you'll see if the BIOS or a FastDisk driver is used and if
> 32 bit file access on the various local hard drives is on (32 bit) or
> off (16 bit).
>

I have seen this claim made before, but I don't really believe it.
I tried disabling smartdriv and my system ran like a turtle.

--
<!-Outsider//->
MS-DOS 6.22, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Netscape Communicator 4.08
"The right to be let alone is indeed the beginning of all freedom."

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 11, 2001, 2:01:43 PM8/11/01
to
Outsider <nonvali...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>I have seen this claim made before, but I don't really believe it.
>I tried disabling smartdriv and my system ran like a turtle.

That's just what I experienced too !
Without smartdrv it would load 2X as long.
(However on a win311 system, where 32disk access and
32BFA were enabled, i did not need smartdrive)

Greetings,
Steven

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 11, 2001, 2:06:17 PM8/11/01
to
Steven V.A. schrieb:

>
> Outsider <nonvali...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >I have seen this claim made before, but I don't really believe it.
> >I tried disabling smartdriv and my system ran like a turtle.
>
> That's just what I experienced too !
> Without smartdrv it would load 2X as long.
> (However on a win311 system, where 32disk access and
> 32BFA were enabled, i did not need smartdrive)

To see which drives are *not* cached by VCache, run smartdrv/s in a DOS
box. Here, that's A, B (floppies), R and S (CD-ROM/CD-R). If 32 bit file
access does not work although it should, rmm.d32 may have to be
replaced; otherwise one should check whether ifshlp.sys (WfWg's
ifshlp.sys!) is loaded in cnfig.sys.

Outsider

unread,
Aug 11, 2001, 3:51:49 PM8/11/01
to
Steven V.A. wrote:
>
> Outsider <nonvali...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >I have seen this claim made before, but I don't really believe it.
> >I tried disabling smartdriv and my system ran like a turtle.
>
> That's just what I experienced too !
> Without smartdrv it would load 2X as long.
> (However on a win311 system, where 32disk access and
> 32BFA were enabled, i did not need smartdrive)

If you tell me the steps I will try and duplicate your experience,
but previously, it is as I said, with WfW 3.11 and 32BFA and 32BDA.


--
<!-Outsider//->
MS-DOS 6.22, Windows for Workgroups 3.11, Netscape Communicator 4.08

The right to be left alone - the most comprehensive of rights, and the
right most valued by civilized men." --Supreme Justice Louis Brandeis

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 12, 2001, 12:33:28 PM8/12/01
to
Outsider <nonvali...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> That's just what I experienced too !
>> Without smartdrv it would load 2X as long.
>> (However on a win311 system, where 32disk access and
>> 32BFA were enabled, i did not need smartdrive)
>
>If you tell me the steps I will try and duplicate your experience,
>but previously, it is as I said, with WfW 3.11 and 32BFA and 32BDA.

Ok I have WFW3.11 installed on my second HDD (D:)
Using the ORS2Fix program, it let's me start WFW3.11.

Under control panel, 386 enhanced, it says for both drives: 16 bit -
BIOS. OK 'll check the box 32bit file access. Reboot windows. Altough
the box is now checked, it does not make a difference. I cannot mark
the box for 32bit disk acces...

Then, I start smartdrive before wfw 3.11.
Now, there is a big performance jump in disk access.

Greetings,
Steven.

Outsider

unread,
Aug 12, 2001, 2:08:20 PM8/12/01
to
Steven V.A. wrote:
>
> Outsider <nonvali...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> That's just what I experienced too !
> >> Without smartdrv it would load 2X as long.
> >> (However on a win311 system, where 32disk access and
> >> 32BFA were enabled, i did not need smartdrive)
> >
> >If you tell me the steps I will try and duplicate your experience,
> >but previously, it is as I said, with WfW 3.11 and 32BFA and 32BDA.
>
> Ok I have WFW3.11 installed on my second HDD (D:)
> Using the ORS2Fix program, it let's me start WFW3.11.
>
> Under control panel, 386 enhanced, it says for both drives: 16 bit -
> BIOS. OK 'll check the box 32bit file access. Reboot windows. Altough
> the box is now checked, it does not make a difference. I cannot mark
> the box for 32bit disk acces...
>
> Then, I start smartdrive before wfw 3.11.
> Now, there is a big performance jump in disk access.
>

You need a 3rd party driver for 32BDA.

http://home7.inet.tele.dk/batfiles/download/ezdrv203.zip
ezdrv203.zip 287,813 March 12, 1996 freeware
Micro House driver (mh32bit.386) is a direct replacement for Microsoft's 32-Bit
Disk Access
Driver (wdctrl.386), and allows use of IDE drives greater than 528Mbytes in
capacity.

Stephan Grossklass

unread,
Aug 12, 2001, 2:31:56 PM8/12/01
to
Outsider schrieb:

>
> You need a 3rd party driver for 32BDA.
>
> http://home7.inet.tele.dk/batfiles/download/ezdrv203.zip
> ezdrv203.zip 287,813 March 12, 1996 freeware
> Micro House driver (mh32bit.386) is a direct replacement for Microsoft's 32-Bit
> Disk Access
> Driver (wdctrl.386), and allows use of IDE drives greater than 528Mbytes in
> capacity.

The only problem is that AFAIK he has a 15 GB hard disk, and those
*wdctrl replacements only work with drives up to 8 GB.
Perhaps system.ini, [386Enh], ForceMapper=C helps.

Steven V.A.

unread,
Aug 14, 2001, 1:25:21 PM8/14/01
to
Stephan Grossklass <sgrossklas...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>The only problem is that AFAIK he has a 15 GB hard disk, and those
>*wdctrl replacements only work with drives up to 8 GB.

But WFW3.11 is installed on a disk wich is smaller then 500MB...

C: 15 GB (DOS7.10+W98)
D: 170 MB (WFW 3.11)

>Perhaps system.ini, [386Enh], ForceMapper=C helps.

I will try it.

0 new messages