Paul,
>> And no, I've got no idea myself.
>
>You have some funny blind spots, Rudy!
Yeah, including the place between my shoulder blades. I can never twist my
head that far back. :-)
As for those "blind spots" ? That might be because I do not really program
in C{anything}. I do know a few odds and ends about it, but thats all.
> (Just to clarify, it determines whether the memory they point at can be
> altered)
Thats odd, as I have no problem with altering the memory "src" is pointing
at. Before, or after (have not tried during) that memcpy will do/has done
its thing.
IOW, there is a reason I have no idea, as it doesn't make any sense to me
that a function tells / can tell me what I can or can't do with two memory
blocks I own. Can you explain ?
> Both are void pointers because at this stage we are not worrying
> about exactly what is stored in the memory.
Now that I knew. :-)
Regards,
Rudy Wieser