I don't know how to call these (,[,{,},],): brackets or braces? Who of you can help me? I need it for my documentation.
bye Michael
I'd suggest:
(...) = parentheses
[...] = brackets
{...} = braces
or, if you prefer, "round brackets", "square brackets", "curly brackets"
:-)
Chris
----------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Marriott, Microsoft Certified Solution Developer.
SkyMap Software, U.K. e-mail: ch...@skymap.com
Visit our web site at http://www.skymap.com
This is highly subjective, but I would go with:
( - left paren
) - right paren
[ - left square bracket
] - right square bracket
{ - left curly brace
} - right curly brace
HTH
Michael Mutschler (muts...@track.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de) wrote:
: Hi
:
: I don't know how to call these (,[,{,},],): brackets or braces? Who of you can help me? I need it for my documentation.
:
: bye Michael
--
--
/* Andrew */
WWW: http://www.halcyon.com/ast
Email: a...@halcyon.com
--
John A. Grant * I speak only for myself * jag...@znrcan.gc.ca (remove
'z')
Airborne Geophysics, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa
If you followup, please do NOT e-mail me a copy: I will read it here.
->>Hi
->>I don't know how to call these (,[,{,},],): brackets or braces? Who of you
->can help me? I need it for my documentation.
-> You've already got good suggestions for the names. I would define the
-> terms with examples of each in your 'preface' (like most books do) so
-> there's no misunderstanding.
Isn't the general practice:
() = parentheses
[] = brackets
{} = braces?
and then, what are these jobey-doo's: < > ?
--------------
James D.A. Christopher
Department of Psychology
University of Arizona
http://www.u.arizona.edu/~jchristo
Some ideas can only be justified in a word processor.
James D.A. Christopher wrote in message ...
( ) parentheses (often abbreviated "parens").
[ ] brackets.
{ } braces or "curly braces".
< > (in languages that use these as paired delimiters) brokets (i.e.
"broken brackets").
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead Systems Programmer +1 317 274 0749 [@disclaimer@]
MW...@INDYVAX.IUPUI.EDU Finger for more information.
A recent _Datamation_ cover asks, "are mainframes *cool* again?" Am I the only
one who noticed the scathing irony of that question?
James D.A. Christopher wrote in message ...
>() = parentheses
>[] = brackets
>{} = braces?
>and then, what are these jobey-doo's: < > ?
>--------------
<> = carets
-Matt
http://riot.lith.com/
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Pines/5444/
end
Right. Unicode:
[] ... square brackets (left, right)
{} ... curly brackets (left, right)
<> ... angle brackets (left pointing, right pointing)
--
Helmut
> is a Greater Than.
< is a Less Than.
--
Scott Hill
Sc...@DDLinks.co.uk
Software Engineer (and all round nice guy)
"The best trick the devil ever pulled was convincing people he didn't
exist..."
- Verbal Kent.
"the Internet is here so we can waste time talking about nothing in
particular when we should be working" - Marcus Hill.
>James D.A. Christopher wrote in message ...
>>() = parentheses
>>[] = brackets
>>{} = braces?
>>and then, what are these jobey-doo's: < > ?
>>--------------
> <> = carets
< and > are not carets, ^ is a caret.
Every character you could ever think of, and thousands others, are
identified at www.unicode.org .
--------------------------------------
mgSimplify - An intelligent Macro program for Windows 95 available
at www.greenes.com. Now shipping version 1.0.10
......
> >and then, what are these jobey-doo's: < > ?
> >--------------
> <> = carets
>
isn't ^ a caret?
OK, I think I finally know how to make the right documentation. Thanks to all fo you.
bye Michael