CPC <yu15...@yorku.ca> wrote in article <5bd9di$5...@news.inforamp.net>...
> All the messages seem to be going on and on about fat32 this and that.
>
> Who really cares. I won't bother saying what I think about fat32, but
> I'll say this, what *I* want to see in Win97 is a tighter faster more
> optimized kernel with tighter better memory management than in 95.
It's already here in Memphis December Release.
> I certainly hope it won't just be Win95 but now with new, improved
> fat32 support.
>
> So how about it? Will it be tighter, faster, and all that jazz?
It is.
> Oh, I found a bug in Win95 today. I have isdn acc. pack 1.0 installed
> for the dialup networking and I found that if I alt-tab while it
> connects and is shrinking the window to the icon corral tray thing,
> you can completely crash Win95 and have to hard-reboot from the case.
> Cool! Crashes right into text mode no less.
Hmm...I'll try that later...If I can find 1.0....
>
>
>CPC <yu15...@yorku.ca> wrote in article <5bd9di$5...@news.inforamp.net>...
>> All the messages seem to be going on and on about fat32 this and that.
>>
>> Who really cares. I won't bother saying what I think about fat32, but
>> I'll say this, what *I* want to see in Win97 is a tighter faster more
>> optimized kernel with tighter better memory management than in 95.
>
>It's already here in Memphis December Release.
>
>> I certainly hope it won't just be Win95 but now with new, improved
>> fat32 support.
>>
>> So how about it? Will it be tighter, faster, and all that jazz?
I haven't tried Memphis yet, I'm in no hurry to mess with pre-beta
software, but I did install OEM SR2/FAT32 a few weeks ago.
It definitely boots faster than "original" Win95 and seems to crash
less, so it appears they've done some tightening up of the code.
FAT32 is great. I now have my 2.1 gig hard drive all one partition -
rather than 3 partitions (in order to avoid 32k clusters).