When will NT 4.0 be released??
catherine mason
Juerg Reimann
that means...
Juerg
Paul Cooper
>
> Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
I doubt if even Micro$oft can give you a definitive answer. Read their
press release and then add 6 months. That should get you close !!!!
Bob Guzek
catherine mason <cma...@icu.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
Supposedly August of this year. The expected date was December (late
1996), but Microsoft is feeling like the Beta is going pretty well &
moved up the date.
Gary A. Cerkas
been posted:
>Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
rumor? Hmmm.
- Gary
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
email: ceri...@indirect.com
site: http://www.indirect.com/www/ceridgac/index.html
NTSite: http://www.indirect.com/www/ceridgac/ntsite.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nik Simpson
>
>The following transmission from catherine mason <cma...@icu.com> has
>been posted:
>
>>Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
>
>Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
>yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
>manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
>someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
>rumor? Hmmm.
RC1 is released (#1345), I think only to major OEMs. I don't think it has gone
to manufacturing as such, the RTM happens later and almost certainly on a lter
build than 1345.
--
Nik Simpson
Darren Jeffrey
August 24 is a date which is talked about.
> catherine mason <cma...@icu.com> wrote in article
<31D373...@icu.com>...
Paul Thurrott
August or September. The first release candidate was sent
to testers last week.
Paul
Paul Thurrott
It's true: InfoWorld confirmed today that RC1 was sent
to testers last week.
Paul
PS: So where's mine, MS?????
> ceri...@indirect.com (Gary A. Cerkas) wrote in article
<4r2726$b...@globe.indirect.com>...
> The following transmission from catherine mason <cma...@icu.com> has
> been posted:
>
> >Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
>
> Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
> yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
> manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
> someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
> rumor? Hmmm.
>
> - Gary
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fergus Hammond
In article <01bb651c.83be0a20$200286c1@p100>, "Juerg Reimann"
<juerg_...@active.ch> wrote:
> When the beta phase is over :-) MS says in this summer, but you know what
> that means...
You might be very surprised...
fergus
--
Fergus Hammond Adobe Systems, Inc.
fham...@adobe.com http://www.aa.net/~fergus
Fergus Hammond
In article <01bb67b7.e9435240$6880...@netwrx.netwrx.net>, "Paul Thurrott"
<thur...@netwrx.net> wrote:
> August or September. The first release candidate was sent
> to testers last week.
I'd bet my Alpha that it'll be earlier than that.
Gary
Paul Thurrott wrote:
>
> August or September. The first release candidate was sent
> to testers last week.
>
> >
> >
Just talked to MS yesterday, they are saying early Sept. I had heard from
them a week ago it would be early Aug. but it has been pushed back.
Paul Thurrott
Fergus Hammond <fham...@adobe.com> wrote in article
<fhammond-040...@enquirer.mv.us.adobe.com>...
> > August or September. The first release candidate was sent
> > to testers last week.
> I'd bet my Alpha that it'll be earlier than that.
I think you're right: I just heard July 31 was given the go.
Paul
Erich Heintz
>> >Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
>>
>> Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
>> yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
>> manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
>> someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
>> rumor? Hmmm.
FACT! Release Candidate 1.3 is out (and has been for about a week)
BUILD #1345 for Workstation and #1353 for Server are the latest I've
seen so far.
Bill Bosacker
Erich....@worldnet.att.net (Erich Heintz) wrote:
Thats a little suspect as both Workstation and Server use the same
build/code with different compile/linking options. There is a rumor
that if engineering can get it RTM by July 31, they will get an extra
week of vacation. I can't see this happening as there are some show
stoppers in the new NTFS code that haven't even been addressed yet.
Later daazzzz......
Fred A. Miller
w...@netcom.com (Bill Bosacker) wrote:
[snip]
>>FACT! Release Candidate 1.3 is out (and has been for about a week)
>>BUILD #1345 for Workstation and #1353 for Server are the latest I've
>>seen so far.
>Thats a little suspect as both Workstation and Server use the same
>build/code with different compile/linking options. There is a rumor
>that if engineering can get it RTM by July 31, they will get an extra
>week of vacation. I can't see this happening as there are some show
>stoppers in the new NTFS code that haven't even been addressed yet.
Yep.....look for late Aug. or 1st of Sept. for release.
Fred
Jensen Harris
On Sat, 06 Jul 1996 07:01:46 GMT, Erich....@worldnet.att.net (Erich
Heintz) wrote:
>On Mon, 1 Jul 1996 18:44:10 -0700, "Paul Thurrott"
><thur...@netwrx.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> >Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
>>>
>>> Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
>>> yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
>>> manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
>>> someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
>>> rumor? Hmmm.
>
>FACT! Release Candidate 1.3 is out (and has been for about a week)
>BUILD #1345 for Workstation and #1353 for Server are the latest I've
>seen so far.
>
>
Build 1345 of both Workstation and Server are RC1. They are build
simultaneously and daily.
Jensen
--
The opinions expressed in this message are my own personal views
and do not reflect the official views of Microsoft Corporation.
Erich Heintz
>On Sat, 06 Jul 1996 07:01:46 GMT, Erich....@worldnet.att.net (Erich
>Heintz) wrote:
>>FACT! Release Candidate 1.3 is out (and has been for about a week)
>>BUILD #1345 for Workstation and #1353 for Server are the latest I've
>>seen so far.
>Build 1345 of both Workstation and Server are RC1. They are build
>simultaneously and daily.
I just atated what I have seen. I HAVE seen Build 1345 for Workstation
and Build 1353 for Server.
And actually Build 1345 is NOT RC1, it's RC1.3.
--Erich
George A. Brown II
From what M$ told me on Monday, only 200+- beta testers would receive RC1.
They were based on how many bug reports they sent in and I would be safe
to say that the same will hold true for RC2.
> "Paul Thurrott" <thur...@netwrx.net> wrote in article
<01bb67b8.07e7dd60$6880...@netwrx.netwrx.net>...
> It's true: InfoWorld confirmed today that RC1 was sent
> to testers last week.
>
> Paul
>
> PS: So where's mine, MS?????
>
> > ceri...@indirect.com (Gary A. Cerkas) wrote in article
> <4r2726$b...@globe.indirect.com>...
> > The following transmission from catherine mason <cma...@icu.com> has
> > been posted:
> >
> > >Does anyone know when NT 4.0 will be released??
> >
> > Looks like early August at this point, since someone mentioned
> > yesterday that Release Candidate 1 has just been released to
> > manufacturing. This may be true or not -- all I'm saying is what
> > someone else has stated. Does this constitute the beginning of a
> > rumor? Hmmm.
> >
Robert Schlabbach
In article <01bb7017.14451110$170cf3a1@jsogis> "George A. Brown II" <547...@mail.itd.ci.jax.fl.us> writes:
>From what M$ told me on Monday, only 200+- beta testers would receive RC1.
> They were based on how many bug reports they sent in and I would be safe
>to say that the same will hold true for RC2.
Thanks, now I feel really special! :^)
(I figured that not many would have gotten a release that came on CD-Rs...)
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-Mail: schl...@sp.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE
Technical University of Berlin, Germany
Jason Zions
Can you talk a little about the NTFS showstoppers that still exist in
1345.3 (just received it from MS)? I'd kinda like to know what's already
known so I don't bother reporting it if/when I trip over it. (Also, so I
don't waste time trying to run it down.)
I know that 1345.3 *fixes* a couple critical NTFS bugs...
Jason
Anders Gardlund
On Fri, 12 Jul 1996 05:50:06 GMT, Erich....@worldnet.att.net (Erich
Heintz) wrote:
>On Tue, 09 Jul 1996 04:53:41 GMT, t-je...@microsoft.com (Jensen
>Harris) wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 06 Jul 1996 07:01:46 GMT, Erich....@worldnet.att.net (Erich
>>Heintz) wrote:
>
>>>FACT! Release Candidate 1.3 is out (and has been for about a week)
>>>BUILD #1345 for Workstation and #1353 for Server are the latest I've
>>>seen so far.
>
>>Build 1345 of both Workstation and Server are RC1. They are build
>>simultaneously and daily.
>
>I just atated what I have seen. I HAVE seen Build 1345 for Workstation
>and Build 1353 for Server.
>
>And actually Build 1345 is NOT RC1, it's RC1.3.
>
>--Erich
I扉e just received Workstation Build 1360, I believe it's called RC2.
__________________________________________________________
Anders Gardlund Anders....@skanska.se
Skanska Data AB
182 25 DANDERYD
SWEDEN
__________________________________________________________