Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: [OT] too strict on min disk free req? (5%/300GB drive)

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Eric Gisin

unread,
Nov 15, 2007, 3:43:47 PM11/15/07
to
"Jeremy Boden" <jer...@moiety.plus.com> wrote in message news:13jp5sh...@corp.supernews.com...
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:46:32 +0000, Name withheld by request wrote:
>
>> This is a filesystem question, but I could not find an appropriate
>> newsgroup - pls suggest one, thx.
>>
>> We have a 'power user' that claims our corporate standard of telephoning
>> the application owner at all hours day or night, when the disk is more
>> that 95% full is out-dated for any drive that is over 100GB or so.
>>
>> He argues that the filesystem (NTFS) on his server's 300GB drive can
>> still operate efficiently when it is 97 or 98% full. Is this correct?
>
> Power user is wrong.
> NTFS can't do it - many Linux file systems would be happy at 90%+ though.
> NTFS would require regular defragmenting beyond about 30%
>
What a load of bullshit, Lunix troll-boy. NTFS is fine up to 80%.

Jeremy Boden

unread,
Nov 16, 2007, 6:47:44 AM11/16/07
to

Good luck with your NTFS...

--
Jeremy Boden
"64 bits good, 32 bits bad"

Eric Gisin

unread,
Nov 16, 2007, 1:29:06 PM11/16/07
to
"Jeremy Boden" <jer...@moiety.plus.com> wrote in message news:13jr0r0...@corp.supernews.com...

Eric Gisin

unread,
Nov 16, 2007, 1:30:13 PM11/16/07
to
"Jeremy Boden" <jer...@moiety.plus.com> wrote in message news:13jr0r0...@corp.supernews.com...
0 new messages