Bill Gates wants mandatory backdoors. Free Upgrade to Windows 10!

[bleak_fire_]

What an extremely stupid business move.

--

bleak_fire_

since nine-seven

[Slimer]

On 2016-02-23 11:42 AM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
> What an extremely stupid business move.

Provide evidence or shut the Hell up.

--
Slimer
EFF & OpenMedia Member / Conservative Party of Canada, PETA, IFAW and
Mozilla Supporter
Islam is not a race

[bleak_fire_]

On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:57:47 -0500, Slimer wrote:

> On 2016-02-23 11:42 AM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>
> Provide evidence or shut the Hell up.

Would you take a "Free Upgrade to Windows 10" after the chairman of the
developers of Windows 10 just called for mandatory backdoors in all
computers?

Meanwhile its main competitor which advertises being more secure and
(misleadingly) advertises lack of malware, is fighting against it?

Statements like that cause stock prices to plunge.

--

bleak_fire_

since nine-seven
twitter.com/thebleakfire

[Slimer]

On 2016-02-23 12:14 PM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:57:47 -0500, Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2016-02-23 11:42 AM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
>>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>>
>> Provide evidence or shut the Hell up.
>
> Would you take a "Free Upgrade to Windows 10" after the chairman of the
> developers of Windows 10 just called for mandatory backdoors in all
> computers?
>
> Meanwhile its main competitor which advertises being more secure and
> (misleadingly) advertises lack of malware, is fighting against it?
>
> Statements like that cause stock prices to plunge.

In other words, you have none. You can shut up now.

[Peter Köhlmann]

bleak_fire_ wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:57:47 -0500, Slimer wrote:
>
>> On 2016-02-23 11:42 AM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
>>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>>
>> Provide evidence or shut the Hell up.
>
> Would you take a "Free Upgrade to Windows 10" after the chairman of the
> developers of Windows 10 just called for mandatory backdoors in all
> computers?

Except he didn't.

Not that it matters. Windows is wide open without any mandatory backdoor

[chrisv]

bleak_fire_ wrote:

>What an extremely stupid business move.

He doesn't want "mandatory backdooors".

http://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailtracy/2016/02/23/bill-gates-clarifies-claims-that-he-backs-the-fbi-in-backdoor-battle-with-apple/#7ac694da8778

I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.

No one* need jump on me, if I'm missing something. I'm no expert on
encryption security.

*Like Ezekreep, who interpreted my statements regarding storing
encryted files on the cloud to mean files that apps like Google Docs
would need to manipulate, as if I didn't know that Google Docs would
not be able to deal with your encrypted files. The Kreep is a
*stupid* asshole and a liar, and doesn't mind making a fscking idiot
of himself, if it allows him to attack his betters.

--
"It's sad that a Linux software malfunction caused the A330 to crash
and kill everyone aboard the plane." - trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel"

[Slimer]

On 2016-02-23 12:56 PM, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
> bleak_fire_ wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:57:47 -0500, Slimer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-02-23 11:42 AM, bleak_fire_ wrote:
>>>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>>>
>>> Provide evidence or shut the Hell up.
>>
>> Would you take a "Free Upgrade to Windows 10" after the chairman of the
>> developers of Windows 10 just called for mandatory backdoors in all
>> computers?
>
> Except he didn't.

Truth from Peter the Klöwn. Call the presses!

> Not that it matters. Windows is wide open without any mandatory backdoor

Meanwhile, the security holes that end up being reported in the news
nowadays are from open-source projects such as Android.

[Anonymous]

khazars are not a "race" but a bastard "race" lie all of eastern Europe & ex Soviet northern states that did not come in existence circa 700 years ago. It adopted Judaism, that does not make it a Semite. Most Semites are from the Middle East. As "slimer" is part of this genetic scum that has yet to produce anything from that part of the world -therefore a well known expression "bastard by race, bastard by nature". This seen in actual history, the invasion of the West by this EEU vermin, changing the entire identity to suit its own needs, western wars 1 and 2, invasion of the roots of Christianity & worshiping a Roman horse stable called:

WAILING WALL = FORT ANTONIO REMAINS *NOT* OLD TEMPLE

DEVILS AT THE WAILING WALL

[AUDIO] http://www.texemarrs.com/popcast/4313.m3u

The “Jews” are perpetrating a monumental hoax on Christians
and the West by presenting their Wailing Wall, in Jerusalem
on the Temple Mount, as the holy and sacred remains of their
famed Jewish Temple. In fact, the Western Wall, as it is better
known, was not part of the Temple, but is a remnant of the
Roman’s old and historic Fort Antonia. Jesus Himself
prophesied that, of the Temple, not one stone would be left
upon another. It would be totally destroyed, and in 70 A.D.,
it was, by Roman General Titus. But four centuries ago, a
plot was worked to use this wall as a propaganda device to
unite the Jews and to confound the Moslems. Today,
dumbed-down American and European politicians and
Hollywood stars trek to the Wailing Wall and put their
written prayer in a crack in the wall’s missing mortar.
This voodoo mumbo-jumbo is then broadcast across the globe.

Khazar Whites are not Semites, it wants your children for sex slavery, its organs stolen, kiddie fiddling, an active 5th column, protected hate speech, arms smuggling, Nazi inventing & funding, etc. The list is endless
See
https://theuglytruth.files.wordpress.com/2015/09/jewish-pedo.jpg

[Desk Rabbit]

On 23/02/2016 18:09, chrisv wrote:
> bleak_fire_ wrote:
>
>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>
> He doesn't want "mandatory backdooors".
>
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailtracy/2016/02/23/bill-gates-clarifies-claims-that-he-backs-the-fbi-in-backdoor-battle-with-apple/#7ac694da8778
>
> I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
> generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
> privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.

More mis-informed nonsense. Windows has had full disk encryption since
at least 8.1

>
> No one* need jump on me, if I'm missing something. I'm no expert on
> encryption security.

You don't appear to be an expert on anything judging by most of your posts.

>
> *Like Ezekreep, who interpreted my statements regarding storing
> encryted files on the cloud to mean files that apps like Google Docs
> would need to manipulate, as if I didn't know that Google Docs would
> not be able to deal with your encrypted files. The Kreep is a
> *stupid* asshole and a liar, and doesn't mind making a fscking idiot
> of himself, if it allows him to attack his betters.
>

Ah the typical language of a Linux religious zealot. Unable to provide
facts or data they just rant and swear.

[Peter Köhlmann]

Desk Rabbit wrote:

> On 23/02/2016 18:09, chrisv wrote:
>> bleak_fire_ wrote:
>>
>>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>>
>> He doesn't want "mandatory backdooors".
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailtracy/2016/02/23/bill-gates-clarifies-claims-that-he-backs-the-fbi-in-backdoor-battle-with-apple/#7ac694da8778
>>
>> I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
>> generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
>> privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.
>
> More mis-informed nonsense. Windows has had full disk encryption since
> at least 8.1
>

It has since Win2K. But in W2K it is extremely easy to defeat.
starting with XP it is halfway secure, but has lots of problems (and still
has) when several users in a network have access to encrypted files

[chrisv]

> Desk Rabbit wrote:

>>
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
>>> generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
>>> privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.
>>
>> More mis-informed nonsense. Windows has had full disk encryption since
>> at least 8.1

Well, about once every five years or so, I get corrected by an idiot.

(Cue "What does that make you?" idiocy.)

--
"Samsung makes Android devices. There are several dozens of employees
that Samsung has killed in order to boost it's immoral profits." -
trolling fsckwit "Ezekiel", apparently unaware that Samsung also makes
Windows devices.

[Desk Rabbit]

On 24/02/2016 12:50, chrisv wrote:
>> Desk Rabbit wrote:
>>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
>>>> generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
>>>> privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.
>>>
>>> More mis-informed nonsense. Windows has had full disk encryption since
>>> at least 8.1
>

> Well, about once every five minutes or so, I get corrected by a superior.

Fixed your post for you.

If you stowed your pre-conceived ideas and did a little bit of research
you wouldn't look like an idiot now.

[Ezekiel]

"bleak_fire_" <pena...@yomomma.hot.invalid> wrote in message
news:nnd$35b071b4$1fd11f70@080f9c963ea6bdf6...

> What an extremely stupid business move.
>

You forgot to post the actual quote from Gates where he "wants mandatory
backdoors."

Then again, we all know that there is no such quote.

--
"Microsoft implements the Unicode standard using UTF-16. This means that
ascii text files are now TWICE as large. Very stupid."

The "very stupid" Fabian Russell
<pan.2015.11...@localhost.localdomain>
Nov 9, 2015

[Ezekiel]

"Desk Rabbit" <m...@example.com> wrote in message
news:nak55u$fvn$1...@deskrabbit.motzarella.org...

> On 23/02/2016 18:09, chrisv wrote:
>> bleak_fire_ wrote:
>>
>>> What an extremely stupid business move.
>>
>> He doesn't want "mandatory backdooors".
>>
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/abigailtracy/2016/02/23/bill-gates-clarifies-claims-that-he-backs-the-fbi-in-backdoor-battle-with-apple/#7ac694da8778
>>
>> I'm not sure if Windows desktops even need a backdoor. They don't
>> generally use full-disk encryption, like the new phones do, and other
>> privacy solutions, like GPG, probably can't be backdoored.
>
> More mis-informed nonsense. Windows has had full disk encryption since at
> least 8.1
>
>>
>> No one* need jump on me, if I'm missing something. I'm no expert on
>> encryption security.
>
> You don't appear to be an expert on anything judging by most of your
> posts.

He certainly knows nothing about encryption, software testing or the basics
of electrical engineering.

>> *Like Ezekreep, who interpreted my statements regarding storing
>> encryted files on the cloud to mean files that apps like Google Docs
>> would need to manipulate, as if I didn't know that Google Docs would
>> not be able to deal with your encrypted files. The Kreep is a
>> *stupid* asshole and a liar, and doesn't mind making a fscking idiot
>> of himself, if it allows him to attack his betters.

Fact is that files in the cloud were *never* mentioned once in that thread
which was about Google Docs. So your excuse simply doesn't hold water. Yes
turd, you made a jackass of yourself. Put on your big boy pants and deal
with it.

<quote>
>Problem with Chromebooks in the enterprise - when IBM, HP, eBay,
>Citi Bank, etc writes an email, internal document or spreadsheet they don't
>want Google to see each and every word they write?

Didn't think you had the brains that God gave a cockroach, fsckwit.

How about encrypting things that they don't want others to see?
</quote>

> Ah the typical language of a Linux religious zealot. Unable to provide
> facts or data they just rant and swear.

Turdv should quit screaming and simply accept the fact that he's not very
bright.

--
> Pretty much everyone is suffering
> from this export-grade encryption.

"Export-grade." Right. Not much of Winblows is "export grade".
March 6, 2015
turdv - a Windows user frothing over something he's too ignorant to
understand. Not bright enough to realize that "export-grade" encryption is
"weak encryption."
<jtgjfah7kip3afjmq...@4ax.com>`