All in all, I'm very impressed with the work the wayland community has done since I last did a serious look at the state of things. I'm still waiting for a stacking window manager that scratches the same itch for me that icewm does, but I'm following labwc with great interest. At this point though, I've established that I can live my life on wayland, and for the time being I am. Not everyone can yet though, and there's still work to be done. Part of why I'm feeling the urge to transition to wayland is performance benefits, but the other part is so that I'll be able to help solve the unsolved problems to make it viable for more people.
I don't think X is ever going to die. Even if it fades away on Linux, there's a lot of old video hardware that will probably only ever be well supported with real Xorg, on Linux and other OSes such as NetBSD. That stuff is already seeing support dropped in more recent versions of Xorg, and preservationists will need to do digging to find versions that still take advantage of everything the hardware has to offer. But, I understand now why the wayland folks have been talking so highly of it, and how drastically it simplifies the userland stack, and I'm no longer concerned that I'll wake up to find my netbook has become unusable for modern software.
I';ve been on Wayland on both my laptop and workstation for a long time now, and there';s no way I';m ever going back with just how much better it performs than X.org. Only my main PC (used mostly for gaming) is still on X.org (Linux Mint), but that';s out of a combination of NVIDIA hardware and my satisfaction with Mint. I agree with the author that X.org won';t die, but the arrow of time is pointing in a very clear direction.