For home casual use, it mostly is. Because people are on social medial
(primarily) or other hosted (web) "applications".
IAC few home users (and office users) spend a lot of time with the OS
UI. They are in an app (whether on that computer or web hosted).
>
> 2. They ARE very concerned when the UI changes drastically.
People who use computers don't do their work in the OS desktop much. It
is either in a purpose app (Excel, Word, accounting, custom, etc.).
They may need to access files using Finder (or other OS equivalnets),
but a UI change isn't going to make that all that difficult.
I have to train employees and customers - sometimes people who don't use
computers very much. Never have much issue with such - other than
folder navigation - but that's the same problem no matter what OS is
being used (thus: low experience users tend to keep everything in one
folder and are lousy at coming up with file names).
>
> Think of the outcry when Apple change the UI for Mac OS X.
Dinosaurs screaming get noticed. Others cool with it don't get noticed.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Microsoft decided that "one UI for everything" was a good idea, and
>>> it alienated a lot of users. They were suddenly struggling to use the
>>> OS.
>>>
>>> Case in point, my aunt, aged about 70 at the time, struck out on her
>>> own to buy her second computer when her original second hand XP
>>> system needed replacement.
>>>
>>> She went to the big box stores, and she was confronted by computers
>>> running Windows 8, and basically immediately called me to say she'd
>>> like to try a Mac because of it; if it was all going to be such a
>>> change.
>>
>> What the hell was it that stats 101 instructor kept mumbling about
>> sample size ...
>
> I didn't present it as proof, but merely as a RAAC example of what
> I'm talking about.
FTFY.